I use Photo Shop by cropping the photo using size of equal sides (I use 2x2) and then add a new blank layer and crop it to 4x6 and I put the cropped onto the picture on top of the blank layer. There are measurements on the side so you can make sure that the passport picture is square 2x2. you can fill in the whole picture with up to 6 pictures and have it printed. Hope this helps
The newest version of the Canon 70-200L is II lens is more grey than the previous edition. There is no significance of the color change but Canon decided to change for the upgrade.
Gilkar wrote:
I was feeling pretty good about myself until I encountered the beautiful work on this forum. Now I feel totally inadequate. The photos I see are absolutely stunning. I hope to post a few of my own but am worried about them not making the cut.
I really feel the same way. People here really know their stuff. Great forum.
You can use a lead lined bag, but I think that now they say that the xrays used now don't harm film.
Thanks to all of your responses. Great input. The Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Lens will definitely be looked at. Thank you
I have a question that many of you might be able to answer. I have a Canon 18-200 lens as a walk around lens for my 77D. I was looking at a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM and was wondering if it along with my Canon 24-70L f/2.8 II lens will be a lot better (sharper) than the 18-200 zoom. Will they give me noticeably sharper pictures or on my crop sensor camera not be that much better. I know the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM would be noticeably better in low light situations just because of the f/2.8 light opening. I know it is rated as an awesome lens but will it be that much better for a person just taking pictures for himself and family and not usually blowing up those pictures for framing.
Thanks for the help and insight.
Take a closer look at the pictures using other lenses and there may be spot on their pictures also. It looks like dust spot on your sensor.
Hi, have the sigma 150-600 C lens with the sigma 1.4 converter. They say that only fits 3-4 of their Sigma lens and I tried to see if it would fit on any of my Canon lenses but the way it fits into the lens makes it not fit, but it works good with the Sigma lens without any real quality loss (maybe a little softer focus). It is heavy but for the size of lens it really isn't too bad. I'm happy
I just got off of an Antarctica photography cruise and there was a professional guest speaker that said she spend more for a faster card since they last a long time. She uses them for a day or two shoots and downloads them to her computer and reformat them in the camera that they will be used in on future shoots. The reformatting makes them like new and makes them last longer. I learned a lot from her. Hope this helps.
I had a pocket camera that something had pushed the lens cover blades and bent them a little so they would only close half way. I was able to use my pocket knife to gently lift the bent ones so that they worked properly again. Hope your problem was as easy as mine. Good luck.
yes, sorry for not being as smart as you I guess.
I thought that besides helping you not miss something that is fast action the burst was also used so that if the first picture is blurry because of camera shake form pressing the button the next pictures might not be shaking
Welcome to the group. By the sound of some of the comments it sound kind of snobby to press how much things cost and it is relative on how much would be a mortgage. I read from a pro once that it isn't the camera that takes a good photo, but the eye and ability of the shooter. I too have been into photography for 50 years and have a grasp of basics and subject setup, but it seems like everyone here are so much more knowledgeable than me so I get intimidated also. That said, I am learning more and have nothing but respect for those that have this ability. So again I say welcome to the group.