Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jmvaugh
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 22 next>>
Oct 6, 2017 20:10:35   #
philo wrote:
the difference is that if it is US it may be fixed under warranty. If it is gray market they will fix it for a fee.


I could be wrong so check me on this, but if you don’t buy the camera as new first owner, there’s no warranty. The warranty doesn’t transfer between owners with the sale.
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 19:17:36   #
When I checked Ebay on those D850s, the cameras were being sold as new. After snickering over the prices I didn’t bother to investigate whether they were from a Nikon authorized dealer or not. It would sure be silly for someone to seriously overpay for a camera that didn’t even come with a warranty....but the world is full of fools.
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 18:59:33   #
So if it’s used and Canon will still fix it whether or not it’s grey market, does it make a difference?
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 16:05:57   #
Tom Daniels wrote:
I agree with your completely The actions of the animals was the fascination.
One was using a tool to get food etc. I am now much more video in my latent career.
Still like beautiful stills. Thanks for the post.


Thanks for posting. I saw the video showing a chimp using a small branch to pull termites out of their nest and was fascinated. I was pretty disheartened, I think it was a Nat Geo video, of a female chimp and her daughter murdering another female’s newborn! Even if I was a skilled cinematographer, I don’t think I could have captured that horrible scene.
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 15:16:45   #
Interesting thread. I’ve wondered why the Nikon flagship D5 and the Canon 1DX Mark II are 20.4 and 20.2 MP and 12fps and 14fps. Now I understand.
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 12:13:54   #
I dont photograph sports and rarely try to capture BIF, so I don’t need 14 fps....but after reading the articles about pixel size and low light performance, I’m not sure I’d really want 51 mp either. So if the 14 fps had great low light capabilities, I’d go for it.
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 09:50:31   #
Laura72568 wrote:
Tonight, in a quest to shoot the Harvest Moon, I tripped and my 6 month old Nikkor 200-500mm 5.6 landed on concrete on its lens hood. The lens hood broke in half and when that happened the hood must have slammed in to the body of the lens hard enough to put a few cracks around the housing of the lens behind the glass which I had a UV filter on. I am not sure of what can and cannot be fixed when this happens as I’ve NEVER had an incident like this before. I did end up trying the lens after the accident and it seemed to work fine but will need to look close at the resulting images to make sure. Any advice how to proceed? Or just buy a new one? Anyone in the market for a lens for parts? Sigh...
Tonight, in a quest to shoot the Harvest Moon, I t... (show quote)

Glad you’re not injured! That’s always more painful and usually more expensive than a damaged lens.
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 15:51:43   #
karno wrote:
I just picked up the infamous D850 from samys I have lbeen ooking forward to using this beast on fall colors.
It took me a day or so to realize how tight the lens mount actually was, well it is at least 2x tighter then d810 ever was and makes a slight grinding noise on all my lenses.
Then after reading on the internet that didgloyd had found that some hard stop lenses will not focus to infinity. So I decided to test out my zeiss lenses on night sky stars wide open and found the that at wide open I could not get two of my lenses to focus at infinity? And the others where super close but just barely focused.
Some may ask why would anyone need to focus to infinity wide open? Only reason I do is for widescape Astro, and then this becomes an issue. Even so the tight lens mount is enough for me to return it.
I feel quality control with most things these days is lackluster at best! Be it cameras, lenses, or anything.
out of the four zeiss lenses I bought, 2 were broken. I still need to send one in. Never have I had an issue with Nikon lenses. And this is the first camera I have ever had a problem with,
The old saying you get what you pay for is a bit out dated for me.
I just picked up the infamous D850 from samys I ha... (show quote)

Very sorry for the hassle, disappointment, and frustration on what should be an exciting, exhilarating, “new camera gleam and smell” experience. I’m glad Samys will refund your money or maybe give you an exchange if they have another in stock.
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 12:26:35   #
OddJobber wrote:
Oh, but it will, it will, Ron. Bigger sensor means more time in frame.


You don’t need to justify to Hoggers that you want a new camera - just get it and enjoy! If you need Hoggers votes to convince your Significant Other, whose also your Chief Financial Officer, then: OMG, you really need that brand new D850 with the bigger, high resolution sensor to save your photography!
Your welcome.
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 12:17:48   #
dleebrick wrote:
Was out in the field photographing waterfalls, switched lenses to my EFS-10-22 wide field lens, turned the camera on and ...ERR 20 "shooting is not possible due to an error". Turned off camera, tried again, same error. Switched back to my EFS 18-135 lens. No problem. Cleaned contacts on my EFS 10-22, tried again, same error. Switched back to 18-135, no problem.
When I got out to a spot where I had cell reception, I looked up ERR 20 and most solutions said to turn off camera, remove battery, remove lens, try again. Error apparently is some mechanical issue with the shutter that usually requires a service call. Did multiple times, didn't work. Put on 10-22 lens again. Still got ERR 20. Removed lens, happened to notice a small 1" o-ring sitting off-kilter over the camera mirror. Looked at the lens and something looked a little different. Turns out that the o-ring is part of the inner mating surface of the 10-22 lens and had come loose. Replaced the o-ring on the lens, put the lens on the camera, and no more ERR 20!
Haven't seen this listed as a possible solution to ERR 20 problems, so thought I would share it. Looked at my other EFS lenses and they don't seem to have a removable o-ring, so maybe that's unique to the wide angle item.
Was out in the field photographing waterfalls, swi... (show quote)

Great field work! I have the 80D and was considering a wide angle lens if Santa’s feeling generous this year. I book marked this for future reference. Thank you!
Go to
Oct 4, 2017 11:44:02   #
I found this article from 2015 - not definitive but worth thinking about for those buying higher resolution full frame cameras https://fstoppers.com/originals/are-your-lenses-suddenly-obsolete-85888
And I’ll check out JPLs links.
Go to
Oct 4, 2017 11:26:56   #
terry44 wrote:
No I think it was one of the folks you mentioned, I am not that knowledgeable on the subject I just goggled a bunch of the articles and came to the conclusion that much of the articles are older by a couple years it is an interesting subject though it never occurred to me until you brought it up, and I am bored to death here in the hospital I was heading out to go shoot a couple local petroglyph sites and took a bad fall in my driveway, threw my hip implant out of wack they may have to do a corrective surgery or a replacement the metal went bad 6 months after they put it in back in 2007 have been doging the surgery but may have to have it done now will know more around thursday they are telling me, it;s hell to get old and have a body that's falling apart.
No I think it was one of the folks you mentioned, ... (show quote)

Poor You! I hope you recover fully and can keep from becoming too bored reading and researching all your favorite topics and hobbies! Yes-getting old is hell but it beats the alternative.
Take care!
Go to
Oct 4, 2017 09:50:55   #
ChrisT wrote:
Tom ... are you saying bridge cameras are NOT convenient?

They are so very light and compact ... and have extensive zoom ranges ...

Many of them are almost as light as I-Phones ....

Many can even be shoved into a waist-pak, or put in a purse ...

That's not convenient?

Ok, true confessions time here. I have an iPhone 7 Plus in a holster on my hip from when I get up and dressed until I put it to recharge over night. I’m certainly not thrilled with its tiny sensor or tiny lenses, but it’s on my hip while I’m running, doing chores, riding, or driving (I absolutely don’t use my phone while driving). It’s there! When I’m walking or running in our neighborhood and I see a bird, a nest, a lizard sunning himself, a cactus bloom or whatever catches my eye, I’ll use my phone, while wishing I had my DSLR. Smartphone cameras have improved dramatically in the last few years so I just don’t feel the need for a bridge camera and I’m pretty sure I won’t ever. I’ll save my money for a crop or FF mirrorless as a travel camera in the future. But I think the market segment has disappeared for bridge cameras.
Go to
Oct 4, 2017 09:25:12   #
I would get IS or VR for every lens. When I learned to shoot handguns many years ago, I had to learn conscience steadying techniques to hit the target. Now, when I’m using my camera with an IS lens, I can handhold to 1/15 sec and sometimes even slower. I stand with my feet apart and brace my left elbow against my rib cage, left hand holding the lens, a silly attempt to do a human tripod....but it works. I wouldn’t try it without IS or VR.
Go to
Oct 3, 2017 21:38:46   #
Congrats! Only 48 clicks is new with a nice price savings! 👍
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 22 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.