Would you rather have a camera capable of 14fps, or a camera with 51mp? ... Why?
Oct 5, 2017 20:51:19 #
And no fair - writing - BOTH ... you HAVE to choose ....
Oct 5, 2017 20:58:06 #
I have one of each for a reason!!!
I don't have 3 or 4 or 5 but I do have one of each. They are also backups for each other and I shoot both on any given venue!
SS
I don't have 3 or 4 or 5 but I do have one of each. They are also backups for each other and I shoot both on any given venue!
SS
Oct 5, 2017 20:59:41 #
ChrisT wrote:
And no fair - writing - BOTH
Sorry, I would take the 14!
So, do we only get ONE lens too?!?! LoL
SS
Oct 5, 2017 21:00:47 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I have one of each for a reason!!!
I don't have 3 or 4 or 5 but I do have one of each. They are also backups for each other and I shoot both on any given venue!
SS
I don't have 3 or 4 or 5 but I do have one of each. They are also backups for each other and I shoot both on any given venue!
SS
Good for you, Sharp ...
It's GREAT to be well-equipped, huh?
Oct 5, 2017 21:01:52 #
ChrisT wrote:
And no fair - writing - BOTH ... you HAVE to choose ....
Neither.
I have my Pentax cameras set for 3 fps because I don't need their faster 6 fps most of the time.
A 36MP camera has more than enough pixels for me.
If I spent my money on a 51MP camera or a camera offering 14fps it would be only because that camera offered something else I did want, like better high ISO performance
Oct 5, 2017 21:02:28 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Sorry, I would take the 14!
So, do we only get ONE lens too?!?! LoL
SS
So, do we only get ONE lens too?!?! LoL
SS
It's NOT about lenses, Sharp ... you can have as many of those as you want ....
Oct 5, 2017 21:03:45 #
The 51mp as I do not shoot sports or fast moving wildlife, mostly landscape and shots where I do not need 14fps.
But yeah both in the same camera would be nice.
But yeah both in the same camera would be nice.
ChrisT wrote:
And no fair - writing - BOTH ... you HAVE to choose ....
Oct 5, 2017 21:03:49 #
ChrisT wrote:
Good for you, Sharp ...
It's GREAT to be well-equipped, huh?
It's GREAT to be well-equipped, huh?
Yes, it's great to be well hu........., oh, wait, you mean cameras, uh, oh, yeah!!!
SS
Oct 5, 2017 21:11:03 #
rehess wrote:
Neither.
I have my Pentax cameras set for 3 fps because I don't need their faster 6 fps most of the time.
A 36MP camera has more than enough pixels for me.
If I spent my money on a 51MP camera or a camera offering 14fps it would be only because that camera offered something else I did want, like better high ISO performance
I have my Pentax cameras set for 3 fps because I don't need their faster 6 fps most of the time.
A 36MP camera has more than enough pixels for me.
If I spent my money on a 51MP camera or a camera offering 14fps it would be only because that camera offered something else I did want, like better high ISO performance
Each new camera design offers higher ISO performance than the last, RE ... for instance, the D5 comes with a stat level of 102,400 ... and expands to an incredible 3,280,000 !!!! ... but how much of that is REALLY usable?
I suspect part of the reason for the ever-higher numbers, is marketing ...
Oct 5, 2017 21:15:50 #
terry44 wrote:
The 51mp as I do not shoot sports or fast moving wildlife, mostly landscape and shots where I do not need 14fps.
But yeah both in the same camera would be nice.
But yeah both in the same camera would be nice.
Hey ... how are ya doing, Terry ... are you out of the hospital, yet?
That's the trick, see ... YOU CAN"T HAVE THEM BOTH!!!!
Choose the faster frame rate - and you will lose out on the MP count ...
Choose the higher res ... and you're stuck with mediocre speed ... that's why I wrote - EITHER, OR ....
Oct 5, 2017 21:17:58 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Yes, it's great to be well hu........., oh, wait, you mean cameras, uh, oh, yeah!!!
SS
SS
Oct 5, 2017 21:20:03 #
ChrisT wrote:
Each new camera design offers higher ISO performance than the last, RE ... for instance, the D5 comes with a stat level of 102,400 ... and expands to an incredible 3,280,000 !!!! ... but how much of that is REALLY usable?
I suspect part of the reason for the ever-higher numbers, is marketing ...
I suspect part of the reason for the ever-higher numbers, is marketing ...
I'm not talking about ISO settings; I 'm talking about delivering low-noise images at ISO settings that we would have labeled as "insanely high ISO settings" just a year or two ago. I have seen images from the Pentax KP that make me, for the first time in a long time, want a camera solely because of its capabilities; between the sensor and the built-in Noise Reduction, it seems to be doing the job. I am willing to believe that the Nikon D850 will do even better - at a somewhat higher price tag. {and, no, people haven't said much about K-1 in this respect}
Oct 5, 2017 21:34:14 #
rehess wrote:
I'm not talking about ISO settings; I 'm talking a... (show quote)
Yup, RE ... the difference is about two-and-a-half grand ...
But, at least - the Nikon entry gives you a top-deck LCD !!!!
Oct 5, 2017 21:35:57 #
No had a pretty rough day they started already with physical therapy, did not do well the stitches ripped and blood everywhere and the meds they are giving me for pain had to be changed from Fentanyl to just morphine shots they were giving me both and I was so out of it I barely was functioning my wife caught it and bitched at them so now morphine and ibuprofen for pain which is better I am more aware though loopy as hell.
They are still sticking with Monday afternoon for me to be released, sure hope I am better by the 16th as we are going back up to Sonora, Ca. to finish up the paperwork on the new house and this house is set to start being shown on the 13th. I really want to recuperate back home on Maui on the beach but looks as if we will get back there this spring instead, this fall threw a monkeywrench on a lot of plans. These nurses are not really that happy I have my laptop with me as I guess they think I am not getting rested.
They are still sticking with Monday afternoon for me to be released, sure hope I am better by the 16th as we are going back up to Sonora, Ca. to finish up the paperwork on the new house and this house is set to start being shown on the 13th. I really want to recuperate back home on Maui on the beach but looks as if we will get back there this spring instead, this fall threw a monkeywrench on a lot of plans. These nurses are not really that happy I have my laptop with me as I guess they think I am not getting rested.
ChrisT wrote:
Hey ... how are ya doing, Terry ... are you out of the hospital, yet?
That's the trick, see ... YOU CAN"T HAVE THEM BOTH!!!!
Choose the faster frame rate - and you will lose out on the MP count ...
Choose the higher res ... and you're stuck with mediocre speed ... that's why I wrote - EITHER, OR ....
That's the trick, see ... YOU CAN"T HAVE THEM BOTH!!!!
Choose the faster frame rate - and you will lose out on the MP count ...
Choose the higher res ... and you're stuck with mediocre speed ... that's why I wrote - EITHER, OR ....
Oct 5, 2017 21:37:51 #
Speed for landscapes and stills aren't needed very much so I would be more satisfied with the extra mp's
ChrisT wrote:
Hey ... how are ya doing, Terry ... are you out of the hospital, yet?
That's the trick, see ... YOU CAN"T HAVE THEM BOTH!!!!
Choose the faster frame rate - and you will lose out on the MP count ...
Choose the higher res ... and you're stuck with mediocre speed ... that's why I wrote - EITHER, OR ....
That's the trick, see ... YOU CAN"T HAVE THEM BOTH!!!!
Choose the faster frame rate - and you will lose out on the MP count ...
Choose the higher res ... and you're stuck with mediocre speed ... that's why I wrote - EITHER, OR ....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.