Posts for: Ira
Jan 25, 2018 09:54:02 #
I have the D7200. I wouldn't go over ISO-1600, It will start to look noisy if you go much higher. Try to keep it as low as you can.
I also have the D750 and It is much better in handling low light.
I also have the D750 and It is much better in handling low light.
Jan 24, 2018 07:17:08 #
Shoot with very fast shutter speeds, when your zoomed in any camera shake is amplified. It might be movement blur and not soft focus.
Jan 24, 2018 06:40:36 #
I recently got one, but haven't shot with it much yet. I'm still working on setting up the fine tune and I changed the VC to favor the viewfinder using the Tap-in Console.
joer wrote:
Thanks for asking...Tamron.
Jan 24, 2018 06:28:11 #
Jan 24, 2018 06:20:32 #
Jan 24, 2018 06:03:20 #
Jan 24, 2018 06:02:57 #
Jan 24, 2018 05:39:10 #
You can indicate to only import new photos. Under "File Handling" in the import modual (on the upper right), Check the box "Don't Import Suspected Duplicates".
Jan 23, 2018 20:10:26 #
I had one too, It was a great camera.
tropics68 wrote:
The first and only one I ever had. Minolta SRT101. Brought it back across the pond in 1968. Had it for 5 or 6 years then sold it because my wife at the time refused to learn how to use it. I still have hundreds of slides in carousels stored in the basement. Believe it or not they are mostly still in good shape. This was shot 50 years ago.
Jan 23, 2018 11:55:29 #
You can go to Google Images and upload your photo and it will search the internet to see where the image shows up.
It's a great way to make sure that no one is using your images wthout your permission.
Also, If you sell your photos to stock photo houses (Shutterstock, iStock, Getty), they don't tell you who is purchasing them, they just tell you that image sold. This is a way to see where they are being used.
https://images.google.com
It's a great way to make sure that no one is using your images wthout your permission.
Also, If you sell your photos to stock photo houses (Shutterstock, iStock, Getty), they don't tell you who is purchasing them, they just tell you that image sold. This is a way to see where they are being used.
https://images.google.com
Jan 23, 2018 11:48:14 #
I've used them, the results are great and beautiful quality.
Jan 23, 2018 11:36:15 #
Nikkormat
Jan 17, 2018 12:02:36 #
Yup,
I bought a Vello for my Nikon 70-200mm f4 (it is the same size as the one for the new Nikon 300mm F4P lens). The Quality is great and it was less then half the price, I highly recommend it for those lenses. I couldn't find one for this lens from Vello.
I bought a Vello for my Nikon 70-200mm f4 (it is the same size as the one for the new Nikon 300mm F4P lens). The Quality is great and it was less then half the price, I highly recommend it for those lenses. I couldn't find one for this lens from Vello.
47greyfox wrote:
Nice shots! FYI, you mentioned that the tripod collar goes for $100. I didn’t specifically look for one for your lens but I’ve had success in finding quality collars for others on eBay for much less (<1/2) than the oem versions. Needless to say, there is a lot junk out there so being cautious is an understatement.
Jan 17, 2018 08:25:18 #
jccash wrote:
I took the photos at the Wakodahatchee Wetlands in Boynton Beach, Florida.Where did you capture these images?
There are also another two places to photograph wildlife within 3 miles from Wakodahatchee. Green Cay Nature Center and Wetlands, and the Loxahatchee National Refugee, where I am a volunteer. I also use a Tamron 150-600 G2, but wanted a smaller good quality lens for hiking. The 100-400 is much lighter, but doesn't have the same reach.
Jan 16, 2018 10:37:33 #
I just got the new Tamron 100-400mm lens and took it for a test run yesterday after doing AF fine tune adjustments using the TAP-in console and it's software.
The lens is very light, and easy to walk around with (39.3ozs. without the collar). It is very sharp throughout the entire range. The AF works well. The Vibration control works very well even though you don't notice it in the view finder when its working. I also set the VC up to be more noticeable in the view finder using the Tap-in console . It helped some what, but it is only slightly more noticeable in the view finder. It is much different then the Tamron 150-600mm's VC that locks solid when you hit the sutter button(too much). This feels more like the Nikon VR. I did notice some color fringing in the hottest over exposed areas. You can notice it on the Egret photo bellow in the area with the highlights on the green leaves. I'm not worried about it, it would be able to be removed in lightroon with defringe or remove chromatic aberration. I'm not sure if it is the camera or a characteristic of this lens. Also, the tripod collar is sold separately ($100). The lens sells for $800. It seems to be a great len at this point.
Here are some examples from my first day using it with my Nikon D7200.
The lens is very light, and easy to walk around with (39.3ozs. without the collar). It is very sharp throughout the entire range. The AF works well. The Vibration control works very well even though you don't notice it in the view finder when its working. I also set the VC up to be more noticeable in the view finder using the Tap-in console . It helped some what, but it is only slightly more noticeable in the view finder. It is much different then the Tamron 150-600mm's VC that locks solid when you hit the sutter button(too much). This feels more like the Nikon VR. I did notice some color fringing in the hottest over exposed areas. You can notice it on the Egret photo bellow in the area with the highlights on the green leaves. I'm not worried about it, it would be able to be removed in lightroon with defringe or remove chromatic aberration. I'm not sure if it is the camera or a characteristic of this lens. Also, the tripod collar is sold separately ($100). The lens sells for $800. It seems to be a great len at this point.
Here are some examples from my first day using it with my Nikon D7200.
