I like #2 for the same reasons---the profile shot shows the beak much better. Both are outstanding!
No one mentioned the Nikon 40mm AF. It's relatively new and inexpensive (about $300). I have it and like it a lot. I would have bought the 105mm but it's not in my hobby budget.
My local camera repair guy just retired from his artisan trade. He was a fantastic craftsman and could fix anything for a modest price. He claims that Nikon would no longer sell him parts to support his business, forcing his retirement and forcing his customers to use Nikon service. Can anyone collaborate this as fact?
More importantly, what does it really mean. E.g., is 4000 a dangerously high number of shutter activations if you are buying a used camera? Or is 10,000? What significance does the statistic have?
Thanks. I'm trying to use a mini HDMI cable to get high def. so a simple SD card reader doesn't work.
I realize that SD Card files created on one camera cannot be read on another---is there a way around this? I have some photos that I shot on my D5000 that I would like to have my D5100 read so I can I view them on my 1080 HDTV.
I have a Nikon 40mm AF Micro and am very pleased with it. About $300 new.
I have the AF 40mm Nikon Micro and am pleased with its performance. About $300 new.
I have the AF 40mm Nikon Micro and am pleased with its performance. About $300 new.
I like the pipe wrench (or any large opening wrench) suggestion best, but would add ---use the rubber jar holder to cover the edge of the filter so the wrench doesn't scar the filter's edge.
Fabulous. Can you share the specifics of the shot, please.
This is a moth---a pretty colorful butterfly would enhance your photo.
The util. lines spoil the first one, otherwise I would choose it for its composition.
Essentially, if you double the mm, you halve the field of view. Simple short cut.