Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: JohnSwanda
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 623 next>>
Apr 1, 2024 15:04:18   #
TonyP wrote:
Pretty much the same criteria I use Bridges. Plus a couple more for us: the glass bottles should be a dark colour to keep out the light, with a sealed cap to make sure it hasn't been opened. It must pass the sniff test when I get home and open it, no 'rancid' smell. And it must taste good if it has any taste.
Ive only ever returned one bottle, because it was rancid, and the supermarket changed it for another which was fine. I buy cold pressed, Extra Virgin.
We use it instead of butter on potatoes, slow cooked leg of lamb, baking, salad dressings, marinades.
On toasted sandwiches in the s/wich maker. Stir fry veg. We go thru a 500ml bottle about every 2-3 weeks for just the 2 of us.
I read somewhere it shouldn't be burned, like when searing steak or roasting meat in the oven, dont know if that's correct. Hasn't killed us yet and I've used it for many years.
Pretty much the same criteria I use Bridges. Plus ... (show quote)


I've heard extra virgin shouldn't be used for high temperature cooking like frying or sautéing because it destroys the subtle flavor you pay extra for with extra virgin, so you might as well use ordinary olive oil. It has nothing to do with safety.
Go to
Apr 1, 2024 09:31:25   #
US Army 1971-1974. I was graduating college and had a low draft number, so I signed up for Officer Candidate School and became a 2nd lieutenant, and left as a 1st lieutenant after my two year commitment was up. Vietnam was winding down and there were enough career officers volunteering, so I didn't have to go.
Go to
Mar 31, 2024 21:44:54   #
PhotogHobbyist wrote:
Agreed. Kate had no obligation to release that photo, adjusted or not and the media has no right to criticize her for allowing it to be published. An unaltered photo by paparazzi's of her and the children would have been bought for a large sum of money and would not have been criticized for out of focus or even blurry subjects due to camera movement. Yet, she voluntarily provides a nice photo of her and her children, the media goes crazy over some minor adjustments.

The media needs to get an update on reality.
Agreed. Kate had no obligation to release that pho... (show quote)


So the news media should lower their standards on how much photo manipulation is allowed? They aren't criticizing Kate, they are just following existing standards which she probably wasn't aware of. We know some adjustments were detected, but there could have been more done that wasn't detected.
Go to
Mar 31, 2024 20:34:02   #
The cartoon character is Olive Oyl.
Go to
Mar 31, 2024 20:15:12   #
User ID wrote:
Nearly all definitions become archaic if theyre not updated. Whether your prefered definition of photography is already archaic is just an argument about WHEN the update occurs. If for you that hasnt happened yet, theres no harm in using archaic terms in the interim.


You didn't answer my question. If the definition of photography as the result of the action of light on a light sensitive material is archaic, what definition do you propose which doesn't include that but differentiates photography from other image making media? Do you think all forms of image making can be defined as photography? What other forms of image making which don't fit that definition should be included in the definition of photography?
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 17:31:36   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
If he's not Tim Hatfield, it shouldn't be in Photo Gallery either.

"This section is for posting pictures you took. " From these site rules.

.


The one the OP posted seems to show some oversharpening in the branches and the treeline which the one on Instagram doesn't show. The EXIF on the OP's photo has been wiped. I don't know if the EXIF on Instagram can be seen.
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 10:46:00   #
frankraney wrote:
Wrong section? This is the photo gallery is it not, and they are photos.


The OP posted it in General Photography by mistake and requested it be moved to the Photo Gallery.
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 04:41:31   #
User ID wrote:
Thaz all real, but the photo taliban always hangs their hat in the sensor as being the requisite "light sensitive medium" without which an image doesnt match the archaic Greek roots of the word "photography".

If we were to take that to the fringe, if a person disrobes and displays their tanning lines, then that is a photogram, an image method that was always acknowledged as being a form of photography.


I hardly think that definition of photography is archaic, but has proved very useful in defining photography. I have seen definitions before digital came along which refer to a light sensitive film, but that just had to be changed to a light sensitive medium or material to include digital. I have never thought about tanning as a photogram, but I have seen people intentionally use a template of some sort to tan words or images on their skin. I don't think it's a stretch to include that as a photogram, which I agree has always been included under the umbrella of photography. But I wonder what kind of definition of photography you would propose which doesn't include the action of light on a light sensitive medium and still accurately differentiates it from other forms of image making.
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 16:32:41   #
Nosaj wrote:
I requested this be moved to another section. It was posted here in error due to haste. OK?


Use the Report Issue button to request Admin to move it.
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 14:56:57   #
User ID wrote:
We got Hawgsters complaining that AI is not really photography. Since when did sculpture become photography ? There isnt ANY forum section to move this one over to.


It's not sculpture, it's photographs of sculpture, just like photographs of any other subject. Why doesn't it belong in the Photo Gallery?
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 01:35:23   #
No McCoy Tyner? I guess playing with John Coltrane doesn't get you enough points.
Go to
Mar 27, 2024 00:08:44   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to commenting Terry. An image is not necessarily a photograph

Nigel had it right, A photograph by definition is produced by the action of light on a light-sensitive material. I don't want to play word games (I refuse to use the word semantics in polite conversation) and the accepted term for AI images is "image".


All photographs are images, but not all images are photographs.
Go to
Mar 26, 2024 21:10:21   #
terryMc wrote:
I know it's nitpicky, but a photograph is also an image.

I think what you meant was using AI to change a photograph turns a photo into an illustration. That is what I consider AI art to be, illustrations. Computer-Generated Illustrations/Imagery, or CGI.

Illustrations can also be hand drawn or painted, or made on a computer using digital tools, but while some can be called "photorealistic," all are images, all are illustrations, but none are photography.


There was already a longstanding word that applies to images made of actual photographs combined with AI generated elements - Mixed Media.
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 10:18:50   #
Peteso wrote:
So, if you found it, could you please provide it?


If you use Quote Reply, we would know who you are responding to. If you are asking what the phone number is, you must not have read the thread.
Go to
Mar 25, 2024 00:29:16   #
bsprague wrote:
Yes, you did give him the answer.

A.T. pointed out that he couldn't find it. You found it, cut and pasted the answer. But you didn't tell where he could find it or find other things he might want to know.


I found it by Googling "The Darkroom lab phone number".
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 623 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.