Posts for: ygelman
Dec 25, 2021 17:48:12 #
yssirk123 wrote:
I've used On1 Resize to make Triptychs which sounds like what you're trying to do.
Yes. With this On1 you can select an option to "Tile" which then allows you many ways to split the image -- including the amount to overlap the tiles if desired. The separate tile are saved as individual files; you can print each one separately.
I just now experimented with dividing an image into nine tiles for a 3x3 tiling. Easy.
Dec 20, 2021 22:56:50 #
Bultaco wrote:
I shoot and wildlife with a D500 and BBF. The AEL set to single PF, the
joystick to Multi PF. If the suject isn't moving use AEL if it takes off
just switch to the joystick and shoot. It also makes recomposing must faster
fosus on subject release BBf recompose and fire away. try it you might
like it.
joystick to Multi PF. If the suject isn't moving use AEL if it takes off
just switch to the joystick and shoot. It also makes recomposing must faster
fosus on subject release BBf recompose and fire away. try it you might
like it.
Thank goodness for the invention of punctuation. I just wish it were used more often. It certainly would help when the reader is not familiar with the subject.
Dec 12, 2021 09:04:27 #
sb wrote:
It's an old building in Maine - it probably IS leaning! 
Yes. . .But did it lean MORE in the time it took to switch from the camera to the cell phone?
Dec 11, 2021 13:00:44 #
RonHo wrote:
Picture #1 taken with Nikon D850 in the A mode, picture #2 in with I phone 12 pro max.
For me the second picture is better. So the cell phones have come a long way in challenging the big boy’s. What’s your opinion.
For me the second picture is better. So the cell phones have come a long way in challenging the big boy’s. What’s your opinion.
I agree with previous criticisms of the second one. In addition, however, the second one is angularly distorted. It look like the structure is leaning, not just tilted, toward our right. The trees also lean but it's not as apparent.
Dec 4, 2021 16:08:20 #
AlanW wrote:
I think this is what you should expect. The rocket went up to the right so it spread the reflection to the right. There is nothing in the left side of the sky to reflect in the left side water. Great shot btw...especially from 42 miles away!
Alan
Alan
I agree that Alan's explanation is correct. For instance: Instead of that bright trail, if there were a very tall tree (and in the daytime of course), you would not expect any of the tree's reflection on the left side, but you would see the reflection of the tree on the right side (affected, of course, by ripples/waves in the water).
Jun 17, 2021 09:11:14 #
Kpfresno wrote:
Person is a friend who had been there before. Had to cancel due to personal reasons. I don’t see a need to warn anyone.
In that case, ask your friend for a list of places to visit or just get a guide book. There are many interesting places, all well known and with good photo opportunities, and driving around is not a problem -- there are not tons of roads there.
Jun 8, 2021 10:26:42 #
FotoHog wrote:
. . . I simply converted it to B/W today with the result that I have confirmed my preference for RGB.
BTW, I removed the terribly cluttered background of the original image and replaced it with this self-made textured one. Then created a PNG layer of the orchid itself and gave it a 3D effect by adding a Drop Shadow. Then I merged all layers. As mentioned, I did the conversion today .
BTW, I removed the terribly cluttered background of the original image and replaced it with this self-made textured one. Then created a PNG layer of the orchid itself and gave it a 3D effect by adding a Drop Shadow. Then I merged all layers. As mentioned, I did the conversion today .
I would say that your B/W version shows your lack of experience in doing this. I would even guess that your preference for color acts as resistance to making good conversions. I'm not being harsh; just do good work with color.
.
May 2, 2021 23:03:21 #
I looked at a few of his photographs from "On Assignment." Very appealing. What is your connection to the Museum?
Apr 5, 2021 00:01:04 #
previously:
I just learned (by bold experimentation) that the whole page can be edited. So I merely added text to it in the usual UHH way.
ygelman wrote:
. . .The only "wrong" thing was that I thought I could add text after pasting the image. Apparently not. . . it has to be added before pasting the image, right?
wide2tele wrote:
You can add text so it appears on top of the image or below it.
If you want the text on top of your image, you create the text first and place the pasted image link below the text.
Vice versa if you want text on the bottom of the image. Paste image link, then create text below it.
You can also leave different amounts of spaces between text and images to get things to appear how you wish.
If you want the text on top of your image, you create the text first and place the pasted image link below the text.
Vice versa if you want text on the bottom of the image. Paste image link, then create text below it.
You can also leave different amounts of spaces between text and images to get things to appear how you wish.
I just learned (by bold experimentation) that the whole page can be edited. So I merely added text to it in the usual UHH way.
Apr 4, 2021 23:21:54 #
wide2tele wrote:
Go to your user page then copy the address of the user page.
Currently you have the image link in your sig.
This is it:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/user-page?upnum=3030
Currently you have the image link in your sig.
This is it:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/user-page?upnum=3030
Thanks again!
Apr 4, 2021 23:10:32 #
wide2tele wrote:
Yep, displays perfect, excellent image, perfect portfolio piece! 
Don't forget you can add your page to your signature!
Don't forget you can add your page to your signature!
I changed my signature, but it apparently goes to the image. Your signature goes to your User Page. How's that done?
Apr 4, 2021 23:00:57 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Actually if you use 'attach original' and link that image you will have a better image.
Thanks, but I'd rather not have it manipulated.
Apr 4, 2021 22:53:40 #
wide2tele wrote:
Yep, displays perfect, excellent image, perfect portfolio piece!
Don't forget you can add your page to your signature!
Don't forget you can add your page to your signature!
Thanks. The only "wrong" thing was that I thought I could add text after pasting the image. Apparently not. . . it has to be added before pasting the image, right?
Apr 4, 2021 22:35:43 #
wide2tele wrote:
Another thing that would be good, if you are going... (show quote)
Thanks for all this. I'm testing with an image of mine. I'm assuming it does not have to be attached with "store original" selected. And I hope I understand all the instructions
-- meaning that AFTER it appears here I'll send it to my Pages. Here it is. . . .
Feb 14, 2021 23:44:23 #
josquin1 wrote:
Just a simple question here. What the hell would that printer cost?
The print was that large but each section was “only” maybe ten feet. So that makes the printer MUCH cheaper. But still probably not cheap.
