Nikonian72 wrote:
First, please understand that a lens marked "Macro" does not necessarily mean that lens will capture 1:1 (life-size). It is often a designation used as a selling point, rather than a statement of true ability. 1:4, 1:3, and even 1:2 are close-up magnifications, not true macro.
Second, a zoom lens is already a compromise when compared to prime lenses of 70-mm, 150-mm, 200-mm, all the way to 300-mm. Prime lenses are usually sharper than zoom lenses of same lengths. Therefore, a prime macro lens will be sharper than a zoom macro lens.
Let us attempt to capture as close focus as possible with your lens:
1.) Set switch to MACRO;
2.) Zoom lens to 200-mm;
3.) Set focus to closest setting possible;
4.) Now move ENTIRE camera with lens, "in-&-out" toward subject, until focus is observed;
5.) Take photo and note your Working Distance (between lens front element & subject).
Set lens to 300-mm, and repeat. See which is best for you.
First, please understand that a lens marked "... (
show quote)
First, I want to qualify these photos. This was hand held today and it was quite windy so they may not be quite as sharp as they could be. With that said, I was able to move in to about 2 feet from my subject when I switch the lens to macro mode. When I moved the switch, I was able to extend the lens out much further than I could with the switch in normal mode. This allowed me to shoot things that I otherwise couldn't get within 20 feet of, even at 70mm. Thanks for helping me figure this out Nikonian. :)