Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ssymeono
Page: <<prev 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 40 next>>
Nov 6, 2015 09:43:35   #
You have captured the serenity of a magical moment in a tripartite composition with the emphasis on those very dramatic clouds. Well done!
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 11:24:57   #
lev29 wrote:
I recommend you visit the website of the 2nd co. I mentioned. "Total Spectrum" as they call it, captures UV, visible, and near-IR light. They say it's used in Forensic Science and Astronomy. The "beauty," in my opinion, is that one "should" be able to apply external optical filters to screen out certain parts of the spectrum. However, they report that when external IR filters are applied, the toll exacted on the live viewing display is such that it becomes difficult to see the scene of what one is composing.

With reference to your color IR film "plight," with respect I don't believe that's at all a problem for an IR camera, so long as similar wavelengths of light are detected by the sensor.

I noted that if I was to get my Sony a6000 camera converted, that co. cannot convert it to Total Spectrum, probably because the sensor isn't of that type in the first place.
I recommend you visit the website of the 2nd co. I... (show quote)


I have read your reference today and learned a great deal on this subject. I am beginning to understand the benefits and limitations of Digital Camera-IR photography. Some 30 years ago, I photographed the remains of color on ancient Greek statues and was able to capture some of the original: what looks to us dark red today turned out to be mostly golden yellow but also either blue or green. I have been hoping to duplicate this process using modern equivalents. Total Spectrum -with or without filters- looks very promising.
Go to
Nov 4, 2015 08:43:43   #
I have been asking -but not getting answers- whether it is possible to duplicate the film color IR that had the capacity of penetrating the surface to detect substratum color, or to pick up minute traces of color to reconstruct original compositions. The beauty of film IR was its ability to penetrate the surface. Even B@W could detect invisible elements below the surface of the earth. I wonder if Total Spectrum does this sort of thing.
Go to
Oct 31, 2015 09:07:27   #
Animal1937 wrote:
I acquired an old Argus C3 (my fist camera) again and it contained
a roll of Kodachrome II 20 exp. (processing K-12). The film was at the end so all taken. I would really like to see what it on the film with any luck at all could be something historic. Anyone have any idea where I might be able to get this processed. I think the last in the US was Dwayne in Kansas. Thanks in advance for the help.


Allied Photocolor of St. Louis (tel.314-652-4000) still processes color film once or twice a week. Check their web-site or call to ask if they still do Kodachrome II.
Go to
Oct 27, 2015 10:34:49   #
Great composition of a very unusual and ominous sky with disorderly clouds.
Sarantis
Go to
Oct 22, 2015 09:12:56   #
Exceptional images! Good for you and the Nikon equipment.
Go to
Oct 18, 2015 09:13:32   #
The interior shots are great, for the exterior you will need at least a 28mm lens, or better still a 24mm (still with minimal distortion). There are a few hours when tourists are not around, like early on a Sunday.
Go to
Oct 12, 2015 09:46:41   #
I photographed the planet Venus three weeks ago zooming in and out with the SX-50. Most of the pictures came out as a bright circle in the dark sky but a couple of images surprisingly showed strange and out-of-focus patterns. I tried but couldn't get them in focus. I cannot decide whether this is an astronomical or photographic puzzle. Since we are not supposed to see the surface, I am inclined to think the patterns are light diffraction or perhaps digital cameras have the capacity of infrared penetration (?).


Go to
Oct 11, 2015 09:58:17   #
Check out today's classified section and you will see an excellent 7100 for half the price.
Go to
Sep 30, 2015 10:04:59   #
Sona9 wrote:
Aperture priority


The key to self-portraiture is the lens. If you have, use a macro lens. If not try a 35mm (focuses to one foot), or a 50mm (focuses to two feet). The lens you are using cannot focus at the distance you are trying. With a macro or 35mm you will be able to release the shutter with a cord or infrared control. Your camera will auto-focus, no worries there.
Good luck,
Sarantis
Go to
Sep 26, 2015 08:11:00   #
I have been following the discussion and the many excellent suggestions how to photograph the moon. Not sure if anyone posted the equipment used, I might have missed it. I have tried the 500mm Nikkor, and my old 800mm Tokina on the D800E but found the image to be too small and in need of serious cropping, even with the addition of a TC-1.4 (much better but image still small inside the frame). I finally tried the old Nikkor 1000mm mirror lens and added the TC-1.4B on the D700. I find this combination to be nearly perfect, an image larger than this would be impossible to keep in the viewer long enough to capture it. The attached image from last night shows the result without any cropping or other adjustments. It is very sharp (I think) and for the first time I zoomed onto that puzzling white spot at the upper left and it turned out to be a deep crater from a recent impact.
I -along with others- would be curious to know what equipment and process is used by the experts.

Moon, September 25

Go to
Sep 22, 2015 07:35:14   #
The pictures are great but I also admire the quality of the flowers, the result of a green thumb!
Go to
Sep 9, 2015 12:07:37   #
jeep_daddy wrote:
I don't see what you see. How is he faking it? He probably just doesn't know enough of what he's seeing to describe his problem. I'd be inclined to think he's using an EXIF viewer that isn't accurate.

I think he should upload an image and check the (store original) and be sure not to strip out the EXIF when saving the image so we can have a look see.


Unlike the D800 and other Nikons, the D700 has an aperture setting for 9.5. I am quite certain the the 95 aperture in question is simply a typo in the data.
Go to
Sep 9, 2015 09:39:51   #
htsmith wrote:
Who has had the f95 come up on the photo information on a nikon d300 camera? What did you do about it?


It might be a typo, like 9.5 instead of 95
Go to
Sep 7, 2015 10:58:29   #
cbtsam wrote:
Anybody know anything about this ebook? Its offered at

http://www.backcountrygallery.com/secrets-to-stunning-wildlife-photography/


If I were you, I would also follow the advice given by Haydon: His bird photograph is the best I have ever seen and obviously he has the right equipment: camera, lenses, patience, and a working system.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 40 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.