nikon d300
Sep 8, 2015 17:29:01 #
Who has had the f95 come up on the photo information on a nikon d300 camera? What did you do about it?
Sep 8, 2015 17:40:19 #
htsmith wrote:
Who has had the f95 come up on the photo information on a nikon d300 camera? What did you do about it?
At 267 thousand miles how do you even recognize the subject?
Sep 8, 2015 17:45:04 #
Sep 8, 2015 17:55:16 #
Sep 8, 2015 18:02:48 #
Sep 8, 2015 18:04:28 #
htsmith wrote:
If you do not have some GOOD input do not reply.
my reference to the subject distance was because it relates to effective f stop and in this case they are both strange.
I would normally only see an fstop in the 60-100 range if the subject distance were less than 6 inches, not hundreds of thousands of miles.
what was your camera, lens and working distance?
D300 or D700?
Sep 8, 2015 18:08:05 #
Of all the numbers given only one, exposure bias, lists a decimal point. The subject distance 4,294,967,295 meters (the commas are mine) converts to 2,668,768.94871 miles. This is too small for the sun and too large for the moon. So what was the image of? The f-stop of 95 seems non-standard but it implies a very small aperture and implies a very bright subject. Then why is the ISO not smaller and why is the shutter much faster. In view of this might we suspect the camera processing software is flawed, either in wrong calculations or in ability to display decimals or both. Any other 'others' I have missed.
Sep 8, 2015 18:12:02 #
The camera is a Nikon d300. The question is ( Has anyone every had this on your d300. It does not have anything to do taking the photo. All photos taken have the same information. The f/stop is not the f/stop I had the f/stop set to. It happens with all lens I use.
Sep 8, 2015 18:14:12 #
John_F wrote:
Of all the numbers given only one, exposure bias, ... (show quote)
If one puts a 2.668,.... million mile radius circle about the earth in the equatorial plane of the planets, the orbits of which planets are intersected and was a planet at that point on the date and time the image was taken. The other data, bright source, makes this exercise baloney.
Sep 8, 2015 18:19:15 #
f/95 is not the real f/stop, it is some kind of a error message. If you can help I would appreciate it. If not do not reply. Thank you all.
Sep 8, 2015 18:24:58 #
I googled it for you, says it's a lack of communication. You might want to check the contacts on the camera to lens body.
There are several write ups on it.
There are several write ups on it.
Sep 8, 2015 18:26:10 #
htsmith wrote:
f/95 is not the real f/stop, it is some kind of a error message. If you can help I would appreciate it. If not do not reply. Thank you all.
it is using the proper presentation format, why do you feel it is an error message?
For it to be correct or incorrect makes sense but for it to be a message does not.
Sep 8, 2015 18:26:41 #
Sep 8, 2015 18:45:06 #
htsmith wrote:
The information sheet is to point out the f/stop only.
So you have seen this problem on a d300 and a d700?
Sep 8, 2015 18:47:33 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.