Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Brucej67
Page: <<prev 1 ... 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 ... 333 next>>
May 23, 2012 06:36:20   #
I do the same thing, the grid lines also help on composition and the information in the viewfinder lets me use the sub-command and command wheels without having to remove my eye from the viewfinder.

jerryc41 wrote:
When a camera gives me the choice, I prefer to have the gridlines displayed in the viewfinder, if only to get vertical lines right. I also like to have shooting info displayed, rather than having a blank view. Any opinions?
Go to
May 23, 2012 06:30:09   #
I was on the phone for 6 hours talking with Adobe help desk in India. I loaded the upgrade from CS5 to CS6 (actually full separate install) and when I opened CS6 the first picture I load the image gets scrambled with 3/4 of the image showing, I then close the photo open it or any other photo in CS6 again and everything works right. It is annoying but something I could live with, so I decided to give their help desk a try, BIG MISTAKE. Their help desk person had a thick accent and was rude and after 6 hours he gave up and told me to re-gen the PC and load everything again. I do have plug-ins OnOne, Green Screen, etc. , however they weren’t loaded when the problem first appeared in CS6 (right after loading CS6), but he insisted on blaming plug-ins and told me that Adobe does not support the plug-in feature and that was my problem and I shouldn't use it. By the time I got off the phone with him I was ready to cancel my subscription, but calmed down and just decided to live with the minor inconvenience.

jerryc41 wrote:
I want to deactivate PS4 and PS5 before reformatting and installing PS6. When I begin the process, I get a window telling me that I cannot connect to Adobe. Actually, I can connect to Adobe and anyone else, but not to deactivate. I suppose I'll have to try a Chat or phone call.
Go to
May 21, 2012 07:56:12   #
Having built many units myself I totally agree with you. I have given up building my own units since the cost is now more to build your own (with that said when you build your own you know what quality components you use rather than a preassembled model). I now own 3 Dell Studio XPS I5 8mb RAM and 2 terabyte storage in each operated through a KVM to the same keyboard and monitor. I also have 3 removable 2 terabyte hard drives for backup.

singleviking wrote:
sarge69 wrote:
Don't get mixed up.

You want a computer for photo work with lots of memory which would be 6 to 8 Gigabytes of memory with Windows 7.

32bit system would be restricted to 4 gigabytes of memory while a 64bit system is more or less unrestricted for memory.

You need lots of disk space which would be your size mentioned about 1 terabyte of memory.

Sarge


Sarge,
64 bit Windows 7 is not the limitation for RAM size. The restriction is with the BIOS and motherboard itself. Presently, most motherboards have a top amount of RAM to be 16 Gig. For any beginner, the more important stuff in a desk top computer is the CPU (at least Intel I3 or I5 or better and AMD has many quad core that are up to the task for less money). I do not recommend Asser as a system for any desk top since their motherboard and Bridge system are not exctly up to par nor is their quality of lasting value. There are many preassmbled desk tops out there of reasonable cost now. You are correct about the hard drive size if you intend to store lots of photos as being about 1Tera byte so you can use it for both photo storage and all the programs you run. I also recommend a good video card and monitor that has a calibration routine for color correctness.
One piece of advice would be to also include a removeable hard drive as a back up device for storage. Also, a good firewall program is recommended. Good luck in purchase though. May it bring you years of enjoyment.
quote=sarge69 Don't get mixed up. br br You want... (show quote)
Go to
May 21, 2012 06:18:34   #
How about screen resolution and graphic display?

actigner wrote:
MIKE GALLAGHER wrote:
High computer memory might not be such a requirement if you keep your photo collection on an external hard drive and plug that in. They come in many capacity sizes. Even your Editing Programmes can be kept there and the whole lot becomes portable.

And I think that a good investment would be a reasonably big monitor screen to make everything more visible. It could be calibrated to give correct colours.
Mike


Memory is for processing power and a disk is for storage. Unless you are are playing intense video games don't waste money on a separate video card.
quote=MIKE GALLAGHER High computer memory might n... (show quote)
Go to
May 21, 2012 05:51:06   #
I totally agree with you, I got out in 67 (though I served in Germany, luckily missed Nam) and we arrived back in the states in uniform, my own countrymen were spitting on the uniform calling us names in the reception line, I thought we landed in the wrong country (they obviously didn't know we came from Europe). It's a different world today and I am glad that our people in service are no longer treated like we were.

frenchcoast wrote:
Buddy Bob wrote:
Thanks for the input frenchcoast. Personally, I feel pretty much the same way you do about serving our country. However, anytime my wife and I are at a restaurant and I see a young guy or gal in uniform I usually offer to pick up their tab. I've only had the offer declined once, and he was very respectable and appreciative. and I agree about the "dig" on MWAC. LOL still laughing.


Thats great of your acknowledging them Buddy, I always make a point of at least speaking to them, give them a thumbs up, go up to them and shake their hand, some form of acknowledgement. Am sure we all have our own way of doing these things. I think my feelings come from back in 66. I was headed home after 6 years in Viet Nam, yes 6 years, those of us finally coming home were given strict orders to travel in civilian clothes, never appearing in public in uniform. We didn't understand the reasoning for this until we landed in San Francisco and saw the protestors and the way what few men in uniform we saw were being treated.
quote=Buddy Bob Thanks for the input frenchcoast.... (show quote)
Go to
May 20, 2012 19:22:09   #
And so you can with RAW, just convert it to JPG or TIF, or dont use RAW.

wlgoode wrote:
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
RAW is digital's answer to the NEGATIVE. It provides maximum digital information which is geared toward post production.


I keep hearing this but with film I could often get a good enlargement without dodging, burning or masking.
Go to
May 20, 2012 18:17:25   #
Bravo, best answer I have ever seen.

SharpShooter wrote:
Gary Truchelut wrote:
My question is: does anybody ever use the out of the camera RAW image without any PP.


Gary, Im sure many use photos straight out of the camera and with great success. BUT you must remember WHAT you are trying to achieve. As humans we look at a scene and several processes take place. Our eye captures the scene then our brain post processes the scene. Our brain has the ability to fill in all of the blanks. We have tremendous DOF, never see out off focus and all colors always have the proper saturation not to mention wide angle. Our brain does all of this for us not our eye. Later we look at a scene captured by our camera sensor on our computers and we are disappointed at what our camera captured. PP is our attemt to tweak the scene back to what our eye was seeing and our brain was recording. Our cameras, at least in the not to near future, are not going to do that. After 100 years film was doing a pretty good job. In 100 years probably so will our digital sensors but then we will be on to a new technology to start over again.
In the meantime we will continue to PP, HDR, stitch, composit and change lenses etc in an effert to present to the viewer exactly the scene we saw with our eye, then tried to capture with our cameras.
If you do NO PP at all to your photos they are not likely to look as you saw them. Most photographers will never have their cameras set to the proper defaults to capter every scene correctly in-camera since we would have to change them for virtually every shot. But with experience they will be good enough which is what we refer to as out-of-camera. Even the most basic settings such as 'white balance', is either on auto or we have tweaked it. How many even consider if they should shoot on sRGB or adobeRGB? Many of you do so I'm sure, but my point is that RAW is a tool that the camera manufacturer has given us to be able to even have the ability to transform our shot scenes to what we wanted our camera to capture but did not. RAW and PP are just two tools at our disposal to be able to achieve those goals.
Gary, you are not more or less 'chingon' because you are not using all the tools you paid all that money for in your expensive DSLR. It is not whether you shoot on auto, raw or jpeg or PP. It's all a matter of what you do to get the results you want others to see. To that end, do what YOU have to do.
Gary to answer your question, yes.
quote=Gary Truchelut My question is: does anybo... (show quote)
Go to
May 20, 2012 08:41:31   #
I have the Nikon 40mm micro which is not as pricey and like it but would opt for the 105 myself.

BigGWells wrote:
Have a Nikon D5100. I would like to add a macro for it. Looking for suggestions, opinons and advice.


What say you


Thanks
Gary

Bee cropped in PP with 40mm

Go to
May 20, 2012 08:32:27   #
I always shoot in RAW but do a lot of PP for artistic effect such as the one below. This is a picture of Ford's Mansion better known as Washington’s Headquarters in Morristown NJ where he spent the winter in 1776, while his troops camped at Jokey Hollow about 15 miles away. The picture was taken with a Nikon D7000 and a Nikon 18-105mm lens and processed in Photoshop CS6 using OnOne plug in.

Gary Truchelut wrote:
I always shoot in RAW format and sometimes the shots come out looking perfect without any adjustments at all. I usually mess with them anyway just to see if I can improve them. My question is: does anybody ever use the out of the camera RAW image without any post processing? or is that just not an option for most of us?

Heavy PP from RAW photo

Go to
May 19, 2012 14:40:00   #
Nikon D7000, D2X, soon D800, Sony A700, A850, A900, A77 and a host of lens and strobes.
Go to
May 18, 2012 13:04:36   #
You are right about join an LCC and even UHH are helpful; however when it comes to reading books this course is better. Let's face it even interacting with knowledgeable people has its limitations there are only so many questions they will tolerate at a given time. I had schooling on photography about 35 years ago and spent $3,000 for it, this course is less than $200 and has the same principles (and more) than what I paid $3,000 for.

FOTOSTAN wrote:
richard-sports wrote:
Has anyone taken the 15 DVD course by Vince Wallace, Learn and Master Photography?


Why not join a local Camera Club, and learn from your fellow crafters.... OR 1on1 is far better than a DVD.
Go to
May 18, 2012 09:49:43   #
We are taxed to the hilt, so if I can receive merchandise without paying tax I will. I am retired and on a fixed income and can't afford to buy more gear so every dollar saved is important to me.

[quote=Wahawk]
Brucej67 wrote:
Good advice, however the only thing I have against going to the local store is the state tax. I purchased the D800 from a local store (Photo-Zone) and the tax was $240.

TECHNICALLY, you still owe that tax as a "Use Tax" which is a similar tax which is 'owed' by the buyer of products on which Sales Tax was not paid, such as purchases from out of state where no Sales Tax was charged, or where the Sales Tax was less than in your state.

But, I won't tell on you! LOL!! This is the exact reason that there is a push at the national level to make it a Federal issue that all Internet Sales be subject to the Sales Tax of the Buyer's location. Many stores have been complaining of this issue since many of them are required by law to collect that tax while other stores that are primarily online have somehow gotten by with not collecting. I used to work for a company here in Iowa that did custom printing and shipped to approx 44 different states and believe me, I spent 1-1/2 weeks every month filling out all the Sales and Use Tax reports for all those states!! There were only a couple states we did business in that did not REQUIRE us to collect the sales tax.
Therefore, based on my work experience I never complain about paying the Sales Tax on my online purchases when they do charge it, because without them collecting it from my online sales, my local sales taxes would probably go up.
I too enjoy the sellers that don't collect my state's sales tax, but I will never use that as a reason to buy online. If the only difference in price of an item is the Sales Tax I will buy local and pay the Sales Tax.
Good advice, however the only thing I have against... (show quote)
Go to
May 18, 2012 07:02:38   #
I did and think it is worth the money.
Go to
May 17, 2012 08:26:58   #
"Wish you were here", 7% :lol:

pounder35 wrote:
BruceJ. Should have bought a cheaper camera! LOL! My local rate is 10%. What's yours. Some states are taxing internet commerce or trying to but it's hard to track and keep up with.
Go to
May 17, 2012 07:43:37   #
Good advice, however the only thing I have against going to the local store is the state tax. I purchased the D800 from a local store (Photo-Zone) and the tax was $240.

randymoe wrote:
I normally buy everything online. I have become lazy.

Today I went to Chicago's downtown 'Central Camera.'

I was just along for the ride, my friend was testing the waters on selling his father's extensive collection.

We got there just before closing. My friend had to wait for a conversation with the store buyer.

I started poking around. Oops, s sale caught my eye. There were many in store sales that are never listed online or anywhere except in store.

I could not resist and bought 50 sheets of VC 20"x24" fiber paper for 1/2 price.

This is a much better deal than I ever get buying online.

The buyer showed up, he was the owner. He spent 2 1/2 hours after the store closed giving us great advice.

I used to shop at Central Camera when I went to school near it.

Now I realize I need to make regular trips in order to garner better store deals and gain irreplaceable knowledge direct from the owner and his great staff.

We discussed many topics, most I cannot relate here for various reasons.

I will now make regular trips to Central Camera, they have great prices that blow Internet sellers away.

I recommend all of us try our local store first, and I do not mean Best Buy.
I normally buy everything online. I have become la... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 ... 333 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.