Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Posts for: Chappy1101
Page: <<prev 1 2 3
Feb 19, 2021 19:07:55   #
Ozzie2154 wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with the Smugmug site. A friend suggested that I use this site to store and share my photos. Basically, if you have experience with this site, is it worth the cost?

Thanks!

David


Another Smugmug fan. Love it for several years. Early experience with it used their help organization, called Smugmug Hero’s. They were outstanding and very responsive! Beautiful and very professional website presence.
Go to
Feb 16, 2021 15:21:14   #
Quick note on half your challenge, keeping camera perpendicular to the building. Assuming the builders did a reasonable job, it’s a good assumption that the building walls are very close to vertical. So perpendicular is the same as keeping your camera level (horizontal) and at the same height. If your camera has a level/horizon feature (as Z6 et al) that will be an easy and reliable guide. Otherwise you might consider jury rigging a small level on the tripod. Then there is the distance from the wall...
Go to
Jan 29, 2021 22:39:52   #
oregonfrank wrote:
When Nikon refurbishes a camera is the shutter overhauled so that it has nearly the same life as a new camera? Frank


Can they do that?! Sounds like a used car lot setting the odometer back.
Go to
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Jan 29, 2021 17:20:36   #
Zeke wrote:
Do any of you Nikon shooters use refurbished cameras? If so, any problems? Also, which vendors do you patronize? Thanks for your replys.


Bought Nikon Refurbished Z6 from Adorama in December. When it arrived, checked shutter count. It was “4”! Camera was perfect in every way. Could not tell it was not brand new. Very happy with it.
Go to
Jan 10, 2021 22:58:41   #
wildweasel wrote:
Is anyone here using the 25-200 Z mount lens on a Z6 or other Z mount and can you tell me what you think about it? I am thinking about buying one and would like to hear your thoughts on it. Thanks in advance.


Just got one (a couple weeks ago) after almost 1 mo. back order from Adorama. New Z6 for me and I love both so far. Not using it in low light without flash, so I’m ok with min f/4. Can get reasonable bokeh there and really like the sharpness, reach, size, and weight for a walk around. Still adjusting, so ask me in a year or so.
Go to
Oct 28, 2020 19:18:28   #
dmdpeterdmd wrote:
Any suggestions on how to store / sort hundreds of pictures from years past? Shoe box? Labeled boxes? Have maybe over a thousand pictures or so. Thanks


Well, for me you just hit a sweet spot. A couple years ago, I finally tackled a large collection of 30 years or so of pre-digital (for me about 2000-01) paper and negatives (still need to tackle the slides). I did not wish to spend hundreds of hours scanning, so took a pretty low tech approach. It really boils down to beginning with the end in mind. How will lookfor something when you want to find it: by name, by subject, by timeframe, etc. I went with timeframe. Then I went to the Container Store and bought a bunch of boxes that would accommodate roughly 5x7 envelopes and found some envelopes that with a little trimming would fit the boxes. Then went through all the old photos, print envelopes, and boxes and put stuff in envelopes labeled by year and event or topic or just misc. Ended up with about 8 boxes (about 6”x 18”) that stack nicely. And larger overflow boxes for enlargements and albums. Took most of a winter to complete. Yes, I have gone back to it many times looking for “treasures” to share. Time well spent. Of course now programs such as LR and organizing in many different ways / using keywords etc. nicely replaces such crude organizing. Good luck. Winter is coming.
Go to
Oct 4, 2019 22:27:41   #
CaptainBobBrown wrote:
I used Flickr as my main way of showing images online but then SmugMug bought it and wanted to charge for it but their new subscription policy and app install/setup was problematic so I tried SmugMug based on positive reviews on UHH. I find it much easier to show images without annoying ads inserted everywhere as free Flickr does.

So far I've created 15 galeries covering Hawaii, Alaska, Australia, and Costa Rica and a link to them thru a personal URL which SmugMug makes easy to obtain and link through their website. (See CaptainBobPhotos.com)

It's easy to upload, set up options, and even has some editing features although I do all my post-processing in LR 6 and upload batches directly to SmugMug from Finder. Another thing I love about SmugMug is that there are no restrictions on size of image for display or uploading and no limit on number of image files. I haven't tried to sell images online but it looks trivially easy to set up to do so.

So far I've found only one bug in SmugMug's current version: It allows one to select a gallery cover photo but then doesn't actually use it for the gallery thumbnail. Instead it seems to pick one at random from the photos uploaded to the particular gallery. Not a big detail though.
I used Flickr as my main way of showing images onl... (show quote)


You might try choosing Basics in the Gallery Settings, and then click on Feature Image to pick out preferred thumbnail.
Go to
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jul 20, 2019 21:28:00   #
schneiss wrote:
Considering changing brands from Nikon as Im upgrading to a new camera. I have only 2 lenses so im not tied to Nikon. D7500 is a heavy brick. Considering lighter and smaller mirrorless. Maybe Sony or Olympus? Any suggestions?


Made the same transition a couple years ago, after earlier deciding to try to improve my photography by limiting myself to a prime low light 50mm on my aging but wonderful Nikon D90. Easy transition for me was to then move to Fuji X100F Mirrorless 24MP. Have loved the quality, lightweight/size, flexibility, and overall fun of this fantastic little camera. If you do not need or often use the long lenses of your DSLR, you might feel the same about a much smaller option.
Go to
Jan 12, 2018 21:04:53   #
Rongnongno wrote:
FF = Full frame. FF is NOT 24x36. In Nikon jargon 24x36 is FX. 'Cropped sensors' are DX cameras*.

FF confusion started long ago when folks compared not the sensor but the field of view and came with 'Oh! It is a cropped view of a regular 24x36 camera'.

Blame this on folks who did the explanation for not clearing up the conceptual mistake.

Every camera, regardless of what the heck it is, from an old cell phone to the most advanced medium format, is a FF camera. Meaning the full sensor array is used.

Unlike ACA and Obama care being the same (but perceived as different) FF and 24x36 are not the same at all (but perceived as identical).

Yet FF is used left and right, referring to the wrong thing 99% of the time.

----
Call me a fool for bringing this up time and time again but I just do not understand why folks are not getting it.


-----
* Among other smaller formats.
FF = Full frame. FF is NOT 24x36. In Nikon jargo... (show quote)


Don't know where you got your statistic of 99% on the usage of FF term to equate to 35mm film size, but if that stat is true or even close, and since your definition of FF seems to be your own, then by consensus FF = 24x36. By your own admission 99% of folks understand what it means. So why challenge it?
Go to
Oct 10, 2017 11:41:35   #
Just saw this thread rather late. My experience is very similar to yours. Started DSLR with D70, the later bought D90, loved it and stayed with it. Still using it, but tried latest compact mirrorless Fujifilm X100F for some travel photography and love it for the size, weight, flexibility, feel, and quality. Still Im interested in your observations of the comparision of using your D90 (which you mention "still happy with...". ) vs. the D800. Other than FF vs. DX for printing big, any quick thoughts for a dinosaur?
1963mca wrote:
The D850 is giving me real GAS, however I'm going to pass at this time. My D800 has far more capability than I as an "advanced" amateur. The only reason for thinking of changing is GAS. My reason for passing at this time is that at my age I expect I will only get one or two more DSLR's. The only DSLR's I've had are the D90 and the D800, both of which I still have. I entered the world of digital in 2008 with the D90, adding it to my Nikon F4 (which I still use). I was so new to digital I didn't even realize that DX meant a crop sensor, I just thought the D90 was a top of the line amateurs 35mm (FF) DSLR camera. The info I read at the time didn't really describe the crop aspect. All I knew was that it was a lot less expensive than the "Pro" Nikons. I was and am still happy with the D90 and the DX format is absolutely no hindrance to me, has no bearing on the desire to upgrade, but GAS forced me to want an actual FF camera. Didn't need it, just wanted one. Plus I have a lot of FX lenses from the F4 era and have now added more (yes, have used them on the D90). Finally bit the bullet in 2014 and jumped in to the D800. Again, far more camera than I need but love it. So this was a gap of 6 years between my first DSLR and latest DSLR. Now, looking at the timeline of Nikon FX releases I see a span of only 2 to 3 years between them, each offering interesting steps forward, especially in sensor size and/or iso. So my thought is, since I've only had my D800 for 3 years now that the D850 is out, what will Nikon be releasing in another 3 years? If I keep my 6 year gap between DSLR purchases then I'm wondering what Nikon will have for us in 2020? Figure if I start saving now, I'll even have enough money to buy whatever they have to offer by then. If I had a real reason to upgrade, I'd get a D850, but..... I can wait. Anybody else thinking of waiting?
The D850 is giving me real GAS, however I'm going ... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 13, 2017 18:25:23   #
John Howard wrote:
Everyone be careful.
I have done a few test shots and am getting worried.
The sun will be pretty high where I am, above 60 degrees. If I have my filter on and focus at infinity, with a long lens I will need to work in live view to get the sun/moon in the shot. The camera will be pointing at the sun. With eclipse glasses on I cannot see the live view. Even if I temporarily raise the exposure compensation. And If I take the glasses off I need to stay in the shadow of the camera.
This seems risky to me. Any advice?
Everyone be careful. br I have done a few test sh... (show quote)



Why would you need eclipse glasses if looking at live view. You are only exposing your eyes to the possible maximum output of your sensor, which will saturate at some point. No direct path for sunlight to your eyes, right?
Go to
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Aug 13, 2017 18:23:45   #
Why would you need eclipse glasses if looking at live view. You are only exposing your eyes to the possible maximum output of your sensor, which will saturate at some point. No direct path for sunlight to your eyes, right?
Go to
Aug 1, 2017 19:15:20   #
I cannot help you on your question, but you have made me feel less of a dinosaur, still loving my D90, especially since I have made heavy use of my newest lens, fixed Nikon 35mm f1.8. That then lead me to the smaller and lighter mirrorless Fuji X100F. Not a direction I thought I would take as a Nikon fan since film days.
Go to
Jul 22, 2017 10:06:12   #
Just started playing around with DAP Pro 5 Trial Version. Can you tell me if you used one of the stock templates, and which one. I really like the effect, while maintaining a lot of the realism of the model. Or any other hints using this program?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.