StanMac wrote:
Is that a stock body Tbird? It looks longer and lower than I remember.
Stan
Phew! Thank you for asking. I was afraid I was delusional.
I’m glad you didn’t resist. Great shot.
About 10 years ago I bought a Canon EOS500D with an 18-55mm f/3.5 lens. It was a great camera, but time and life’s circumstances cut my photography hobby short. I’m now offering the camera and its associated gear for sale. I’m itemizing my stash below but am willing to sell the entire outfit for $1000 OBO. I’ll cover shipping costs within the continental USA.
First the list of gear:
Canon 500D with 18-55, f/3.5 lens - $150 OBO
Camera includes strap, batteries (2),
Video wire and charging wire, battery
Charger
Canon Bag $50 OBO
Canon 75-300 f/4.5 lens $150 OBO
Canon 70-200 f/4 lens $700 OBO
Sigma Extender 1.4EX $75 OBO
Opteka Aluminum Tripod (W/Bag) $20 OBO
Opteka Remote $10 OBO
All items together without Full Package Discount $1155,00
FULL PACKAGE Discounted Price $1000
PM for answers to questions. Photos available on request.
rmalarz wrote:
RD, this is an interesting scene. However, there is a bit of flare in the lower-left corner. Additionally, there is a lot of hue contamination which causes the photograph to loose a lot of visual interest.
--Bob
Bob, You're right about the the hue problem. I was pre-occupied when I originally posted, and I allowed the yellow cast to dominate.
As for the flare, I don't agree. The image is heavily cropped--I'm a "shoot wide, crop tight advocate--and what you're seeing may be the violet flower that's below the window. I'm re-posting the image; hopefully the new image will clarify things.
At any rate, thank you for your helpful suggestions. This has been an interesting exercise.
jaymatt wrote:
I like the composition and the subject matter. That said, it seems a bit heavy on the yellow. I don’t have a problem with the green, but altering the yellow might enhance the green a bit, too.
You’re 100% correct about the yellow cast. I’m going to fix that later today.
I went out to shoot last week, and when I was all finished I was surprised that from a shoot of an old, weatherbeaten house I only had one image that I'd put my name on. I'll be interested in your take.
Great set. I particularly like the shadow in #2.
In the 60’s I was addicted to Richard S. Prather’s Shell Scott mysteries. Does anyone else remember them?
BooYah! I’m proud to hear that you stood up to him.
Someone should pass these comments on to him.
What a great shot! You managed to combine an excellent story, perfect exposure, tack sharpness, superb composition, and a goodly portion of luck (the incoming surf wraps it up) to produce a wonderful image.
Can you tell I’m impressed?
What a great set of images! Well done.
Miamark wrote:
This may be the most obnoxious response that I have come across in response to a request for help from a member of this site. There is no reason that composition ideas cannot be obtained from a book on composition or from looking at photos taken by other photographers or from articles by photographers. Of course, composition depends on many factors, including subject matter. I have been taking photos for over fifty years and both learn and experiment every day. I like to take street photography and portraits and find that tips on sites such as f-stoppers are very helpful. Perhaps you could share some of your thoughts on composition rather than state that the request is “just plain disgusting”. I am sure that we would enjoy your thoughtful comments.
This may be the most obnoxious response that I hav... (
show quote)
Oh, I love your response/challenge. This could be fun.
At this juncture I believe I've been given the answers I was hoping for, and I thank all who contributed their time and thought. You all have been very generous with your thoughtfulness and suggestions. For those who scoff at the idea of "teaching" composition, I know I cannot change your minds but remind you of the bard's words, "Foul is most foul being foul to be a scoffer."