Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: davejann
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Aug 23, 2012 17:00:22   #
Dave I have one of those too, problem I find is that it doesn't ajust enough for me to take a good picture, we got them because we went through a drive through safari in Winston, OR.... but as I said it doesn't adjust enough for me to get those shots...

That might have something to do with tripod head you put on top.

Dave
Go to
Aug 23, 2012 14:54:52   #
OnDSnap wrote:
Nikon Guy D300 D300s


But, I think, he stays with topics that would be of interest tp the users of any equipment

Dave.
Go to
Aug 22, 2012 15:00:54   #
PalePictures wrote:
Hey captain. I know the law and the risk. I've shot coopers rock hanging over the edge. I think five people have fallen and died. I've shot Morrison spring caves. the entrance to Morrison spring has a sign. "thirty people have died in these caves will you be next".

I'm not disagreeing with you! I don't shoot railroad track shots(I don't cave dive anymore either) Especially on a senior shoot; there's much more interesting places to shoot no matter where you live!

Your point is well taken.

I can't tell you how many parking tickets I've gotten while in New Orleans!
Oh well they're all paid.

I don't have a criminal record... All misdemeanors.....

And one final note.

Don't ever get on a motorcycle... Especially with a camera in hand.
Hey captain. I know the law and the risk. I've sho... (show quote)


In my old line, we variously called them murdercycles or donocycles.

Dave
Go to
Aug 22, 2012 13:45:40   #
PalePictures wrote:
woman44004 wrote:
mgstrawn wrote:
You have a great eye and your subject looks relaxed and comfortable. That is no small feat with a teenager! # 3 is my favorite and I would love to see the frame portrait (#1) reversed as well!


reverses one


Much better Woman4404. You may want to touch up and add the color,back into,the lower left and right of the frame. I wouldn't worry too much about the railroad, track thing. I usually ask for forgiveness rather than permission. I've never known an innocent photographer to get prosecuted for photographing on a train track (someone will probably look that up and show, I'm wrong).
Just make sure there's no hopping. I don't think there is to much of that going on any more.

The photograph tips the Captain made is spot on as always. I often go back and change problems I have with images after a review. After some time you become better at self evaluation (the time varies from person to person based on ones commitment to excellence and the ability to change what your doing).
Above all enjoy!

Russ
quote=woman44004 quote=mgstrawn You have a great... (show quote)


One doesn't always hear the train and asking forgiveness it out of the question afterwards.

Railroad photography is an area that has interested me so I have kept up. Roads of all sizes, from the class 1s to the short lines, are aggressively beefing up security-largely because of liability issues.

Your call,

Dave
Go to
Aug 22, 2012 13:34:28   #
jerryc41 wrote:
davejann wrote:
Another option is the Manfrotto window mount. I will clamp onto a partially lowered car window. I know it won't address your problem while on the scooter but you might find it useful when you are still in the car.

Manfrotto 243 Car Window Pod (#3292) 243
www.adorama.com › Tripods › Manfrotto Car Mounts

Dave

Man, I would not want to clamp a DSLR to my car window! It probably works OK, but I'd never use it.


Jerry, it is quite solid. At least look at it before you reject it. I have some mobility issues and this thing helps me get some shots with less effort.

Dave
Go to
Aug 22, 2012 12:28:34   #
I STOP TO SHOOT wrote:
Grammyratzi wrote:
I have an odd situation I'd appreciate some suggestions for. I'm just entering the world of photography and am gathering my tools slowly. I am now looking towards a tripod. I would like to keep my cost to $150 or under if possible. My situation is I use an electric scooter to get around as I can't walk long distances. I love to take pictures of just about anything but the times I need a tripod can be difficult since the front legs that will be on the ground, need to be taller than the rear leg that will sit on the floor of my scooter. I believe that with practice I can figure out how to set that up but my question is two fold. First, is there a type/brand of tripod that may make this configuration a bit simpler and still be in my price range? And second, since the legs will be on different levels, any suggestions to keep them from slipping/sliding?

Thanks for reading and any suggestions you may have.
I have an odd situation I'd appreciate some sugges... (show quote)


My friend who I go shooting with uses an electric cart, and we both purchased the Gorilla she wraps it around her handle bars of the scooter and it does the trick. In fact when we go to places I cannot use my tripod (rules of the place) and I will use the Gorilla on my shoulders to steady the camera I will look for the web site and send it... It is under $150. Also we shoot a lot from the vehicle...
quote=Grammyratzi I have an odd situation I'd app... (show quote)


Another option is the Manfrotto window mount. I will clamp onto a partially lowered car window. I know it won't address your problem while on the scooter but you might find it useful when you are still in the car.

Manfrotto 243 Car Window Pod (#3292) 243
www.adorama.com › Tripods › Manfrotto Car Mounts

Dave
Go to
Aug 21, 2012 14:13:45   #
CaptainC wrote:
i think you have a nice start here, but the difference between "nice" and the really good stuff is in the details.

Most of the people here know y view of the selective color stuff -by and large it is usually done poorly and it is usually just a "look at what I can do." In this case you have it backwards - if you really feel you have to do this, the part in color is where your eye will go and you took my eye to the background. I think it would be nice if it were all in color. I know, others like this, but it is SO 1995. :-)

While I am thinking about it, did you know that photographing on railroad tracks in most states is illegal? In every state it is trespassing. It is also overdone! Do not get caught.

In #s 2 & 5. watch the hands - not good placement. Would have been much better with the hands places up on the thighs - anywhere but where they are, actually.

#3 is really nice - best of the group. But we have the problem SO common with senior portraits of the girls - they love sleeveless tops and those bare shoulders and upper arms have as much or more skin area as the face. When you bring the arms up as in #3, the arm competes with the face for attention. I am very clear that they should bring a minimum (if any) number of sleeveless tops. Look at #5 and see how the arm competes with the face.

You did a nice job, My comments are just to help you improve. And stay off the tracks!
i think you have a nice start here, but the differ... (show quote)


Just to add a bit: the tops of the rails are polished indicating that that is an active line. So, not only is it dangerous to be there, it is also illegal=for both of you
Go to
Aug 21, 2012 14:01:37   #
CORNISH wrote:
kayaker71544 wrote:
These are two covered bridges in the area of Houston Woods State Park just out of Oxford, OH


Good shots, I don't think we have any covered bridges in the UK. Do you know how covered bridges originated, I'd be interested in knowing the reason for covering


The story I've been told was that the "cover" or roof was there to protect the wooden structural elements from the weather.

Dave
Go to
Aug 17, 2012 15:46:33   #
4ellen4 wrote:
what is that saying--a latin one that means buyer beware
I have found out that you only get as good as you pay for when it comes to photographic equipment and agree that it is best to be that you wait and get a better quality adapter


With luck you will get that much-but remember,that may be a maximum.

Dave
Go to
Aug 12, 2012 12:22:41   #
gymschwinn wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
I have accepted many Bank Drafts for Craigslist sales from all over the USA, but ALWAYS make sure that bank has a phone number for a customer service department so you can verify the validity of that check, they are VERY easy to counterfeit these days. Once you call the bank and the check is valid, you can safely ship, but NEVER before you have validated it. As far a money orders? Only USPS money orders are guaranteed, but you still need to take that money order to the post office to validate it before shipping as the market for stolen USPS MO's is huge right now. Cash is still king if meeting in person, and I demand it unless I am shipping an item.
Paypal is good if you are using Ebay as Ebay owns it and will guaranteed transactions there, but its not good for private sales as the buyer can simply state he never got the item or that it was not the item ordered and Paypal will retract the payment instantly! They protect the buyer at the expense of the seller in every case, way too easy to commit fraud there.
I sold over $15,000 in camera gear in the last year and about 2/3 of it was via Craigslist. I did receive one counterfeit Bank Draft and I turned that over to the FBI for prosecution of interstate fraud laws, still waiting to be subpoenaed for that trial in Salt Lake City scheduled for this November.
Due vigilance is irreplaceable!
I have accepted many Bank Drafts for Craigslist sa... (show quote)


Hey shooter. remember the Sigma 500mm lesn I was trying to sell? Well, I placed it on Colorado Craigslist and got an IMMEDIATE reply. Guy says he's sending the cashiers check and intruction on where to send the lens. Sounds suspious, so I will NOT send the lens until after my bank verifies for me that it is valid. Anything else I should do? If it's bogus, how do I help catch these bastards?
quote=MT Shooter I have accepted many Bank Drafts... (show quote)


No! Make his bank verify the check. Find their number via google=don't trust any number on the "check" it might be his brother's and get someone at the bank to verify it
Go to
Jul 28, 2012 21:31:13   #
willoughby wrote:
Switzerland DOES NOT issue every adult with a gun and teach them how to use it. Rifles are issued to army conscripts who go through 3 years of basic training and are then discharged with their guns. This is because Switzerland does not have a standing army and if they are invaded, they can call on the trained personnel to break out the rifles and defend the country. Gun laws are very strict and if a gun is used improperly for any reason, the perpetrator is harshly dealt with. It seems every gun nut has a new story every week supporting idiots running around with assault rifles.
Switzerland DOES NOT issue every adult with a gun ... (show quote)


The Swiss have one other more powerful defense. Since the most likely attackers would be there neighbors and since the wealthy and powerful in those countries use numbered Swiss accounts to hide their money, the Swiss have a law that will cause all those accounts from the attacking country to be confiscated and the records destroyed. They don't really even need thei militia.

Dave
Go to
Jul 14, 2012 14:45:07   #
Snert wrote:
You didn't mention the almighty lens cap.


The desist filter made! Dave
Go to
Jul 5, 2012 12:53:23   #
MadMike wrote:
Thanks everyone, I will be getting pictures of Mt. Saint Hellens in the next few weeks, close up. I was really surprised when I saw Mt, Hood sticking up out of the clouds, was lucky to be on the right side of the plane.
garthhill wrote:
What?! No picture of Mt. Saint Helens? I was there when she was blowing her top.

I've flown in and out of Portland quite a bit, but I've never been able to get as good a picture of Mt. Hood as you did. Great shot!


Actually, that would have been the left but correct side of the plane. Mt St. Helen is on the other side of the aircraft. Dave
Go to
Jul 2, 2012 16:28:40   #
MadMike wrote:
A bipod on a gun uses the length of a rifle against your sholder to stabalize it. Since the camera is so short, it would have no benefit. NOW, back in the 60's they had what looked like a Rifle Stock which the camera mounted on top of it, and a remote screw-in trigger was used from the trigger area. I remember it because my father had one.


There is a legend that that gadget was what caused the Kent State tragedy. The students were facing the inexperienced guard troops with the sun at their back . On a nearby roof top there were several photogs one of whom had nikon with a 50-300 mounted on a rifle stock. when he deployed the camera the nervous, armed kid only saw what he thought was a rifle being pointed at him. the rest you know...

Dave
Go to
Jun 28, 2012 14:52:06   #
[quote=TimS]
davejann wrote:
Photo-Al wrote:
TimS wrote:
Frank T wrote:
<clip>

What about requiring people to buy a private product just because they happen to live in this country? Why should I be forced to buy a policy? What if I decided that I am in great health and it makes more financial sense for me to pay out of pocket the few times I get sick than to pay a monthly tax for a product I don't use? Why am I not allowed to make the decision on what's best for me? <clip>


Could we get people to sign a binding agreement that they agreed NEVER to get any serious and complicated illness that would require more funds than they had available? No one except the extremely wealthy could ever get cancer or other dread disease, because no one could make such an agreement. If someone who chose not to have coverage did get (for example) cancer and required years of treatment, the health care system could turn them away because they had no way to pay for it? You think that would happen? Don't misunderstand ... I don't wish that on anyone, but I see nothing wrong with requiring people to provide some level of cost coverage for them and their dependents instead of continuing to expect "the system" to provide it at no charge to them. Oooooo .... that almost sounds Republican! It's so confusing.

But doesn't matter, I guess. Supreme Court upheld the Act.
quote=Frank T <clip> br br What about requ... (show quote)


I don't remember too much opposition to the laws that require motorists to carry insurance. I do remember the indignation expressed when an uninsured motorist causes damage.I guess it just depends on whose kid has the measles.

Dave
quote=TimS quote=Frank T <clip> br br Wha... (show quote)


Apples to oranges. First and foremost, the STATES require car insurance. Second, not everybody is required to carry insurance just because you live and breathe in the state. Car insurance is required because you can ram into me and cause me severe financial hardship if you can't pay for the damages you inflicted on me. Its hard for me to injure you if I fall down and break my arm and need emergency medical care.
quote=Photo-Al quote=TimS quote=Frank T <cli... (show quote)


Tim,

Actually, much the same just not as glaringly obvious. If I don't by health insurance so I can buy booze and then fall and break an arm, you will indirectly end up paying for my care in the end. More absorption of "free" care will be reflected in the health care industry charging more for care to those who can pay. Just another breed of apple. Dave
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.