Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Donld
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jul 10, 2014 18:33:33   #
Picdude wrote:
Tripod is a good suggestion. Another thing to think about is a Monopod. It doesn't have the rock-solid stability of a Tripod, but does have more flexibility in terms of set-up and portability. Also, you can use a Monopod many places (crowds) where a Tripod is disallowed.


Have, and use, tripod and monopod. Increasingly I find scenes when I can carry little gear, and moments of opportunity when there's no time for setup. Thanks .
Go to
Jul 10, 2014 16:24:49   #
caljr wrote:
In my studio at home I shoot a nikon D700 but it is a tank so on vacations and around town I also use a Fujifilm X-E1 and have had great results with it and you have a nice choice of lenses for the Fuji as well.


Nice shots. Thank you.
Go to
Jul 10, 2014 13:33:40   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Goofy: Would you be willing to post some of your Europe photos, including some taken indoor/low-light using the Fuji X E1?

<In another thread if necessary....>

Thanks,


Will look at Fuji. Had a Fuji "Texas Leica" years ago and the lens quality was stunning. Thanks
Go to
Jul 10, 2014 13:29:06   #
Gobuster wrote:
I've just ordered a Nikon 1 V3 a small 1" sensor (CX 2.7 crop factor) camera with 18mp. It comes with a detachable EVF, detachable grip, 10-30mm lens (27-81mm equiv.) and, best of all, an adapter that allows you to use AF-S Nikkor DSLR lenses. So, with this little body, you could still use the AF-S lenses you may have for the D300. From the images I've seen on line, the IQ looks good, and, if you don't print large, should work well for you. When using the adapter with AF-S lenses, all the functions of the camera work, AF, AE and VR in the lens if so equipped. This is the only compact camera I could find that could use Nikon DSLR lenses without loss of AF or AE. Nikon also has a nice range of light compact lenses for the V3 that would substantially reduce size and weight of a flexible system.

In conclusion, you might want to take a look, especially if you have a collection of AF-S lenses for the D300 and want to continue to use them. Another camera well worth a look is the Sony RX10.
I've just ordered a Nikon 1 V3 a small 1" sen... (show quote)


Nikons have been good to me through the years. I'll look at the V3. Thanks.
Go to
Jul 10, 2014 12:17:21   #
Gobuster wrote:
I've just ordered a Nikon 1 V3 a small 1" sensor (CX 2.7 crop factor) camera with 18mp. It comes with a detachable EVF, detachable grip, 10-30mm lens (27-81mm equiv.) and, best of all, an adapter that allows you to use AF-S Nikkor DSLR lenses. So, with this little body, you could still use the AF-S lenses you may have for the D300. From the images I've seen on line, the IQ looks good, and, if you don't print large, should work well for you. When using the adapter with AF-S lenses, all the functions of the camera work, AF, AE and VR in the lens if so equipped. This is the only compact camera I could find that could use Nikon DSLR lenses without loss of AF or AE. Nikon also has a nice range of light compact lenses for the V3 that would substantially reduce size and weight of a flexible system.

In conclusion, you might want to take a look, especially if you have a collection of AF-S lenses for the D300 and want to continue to use them. Another camera well worth a look is the Sony RX10.
I've just ordered a Nikon 1 V3 a small 1" sen... (show quote)


Very helpful. Thank you.
Go to
Jul 10, 2014 10:57:01   #
craggycrossers wrote:
If you want something lighter, a little smaller, but with high build and image quality, please don't only look at Olympus cameras. There are others in the "mirrorless" systems available which also demand your attention.

If "mirrorless" camera systems are new to you, then take the time and make the effort to learn about them before journeying down any particular road. This website will give you lots of unbiased information about the different systems available.

http://www.sansmirror.com/
If you want something lighter, a little smaller, b... (show quote)


Thanks. Will do.
Go to
Jul 10, 2014 10:54:53   #
craggycrossers wrote:
If you want something lighter, a little smaller, but with high build and image quality, please don't only look at Olympus cameras. There are others in the "mirrorless" systems available which also demand your attention.

If "mirrorless" camera systems are new to you, then take the time and make the effort to learn about them before journeying down any particular road. This website will give you lots of unbiased information about the different systems available.

http://www.sansmirror.com/
If you want something lighter, a little smaller, b... (show quote)


Thank you. Good advice. Have and use tripod and monopod but still find that when picture opportunities arise, I don't have the heavy equipment with me.
Go to
Jul 9, 2014 14:06:14   #
Thanks for your help. Will look at Olys. Had a Pen D years ago and it was good.
Go to
Jul 9, 2014 11:53:48   #
My Nikon D300 is getting a little heavy for my old hands. I would welcome suggestions for a high quality replacement, with price as a consideration but not determinant. I like landscapes, scenic, flowers, old barns, general and still lifes; do not need movies.
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 10:38:57   #
I was a little put off by the term "bald headed eagles". I think of them as bald eagles and thought the reference was some kind of put-on.
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 10:38:35   #
I was a little put off by the term "bald headed eagles". I think of them as bald eagles and thought the reference was some kind of put-on.
Go to
Nov 26, 2013 11:57:14   #
I found Red John to be a turnoff. Before he came up I rather enjoyed 'The Mentalist'. Wonder why lighter entertainment features need to segue to the pretentious and the somber Thought Spiderman was an interesting comic strip, but didn't care for the movie's preoccupation with the dark side... As to the Mentalist's last episode, I didn't watch.
Go to
Sep 13, 2013 14:06:00   #
rolf wrote:
There is no common sense anymore


There is some, but lawyers protect us from it.
Go to
Aug 25, 2013 15:22:15   #
jvo wrote:
when one republican disagrees with another, isn't that discussion, or debating, or opinion, or argument, or an attempt to influence?

maybe they don't allow that among republicans - democrats do.


Really?
Go to
Aug 25, 2013 14:28:39   #
Sorry. I seldom enter these discussions, and may never again. Reference was to message from (apparently liberal) commenter who seemed unable to characterize differing views without reference to defecation.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.