Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: stan0301
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 73 next>>
Feb 18, 2024 14:45:51   #
What your camera captures won’t be what your eyes saw - with post processing you can get it reasonably close (if you want to) - a camera is a box with a hole in it - it is in no way magical
Go to
Feb 18, 2024 14:41:21   #
If you are starting with a JPEG your camera has already possessed it
Go to
Feb 17, 2024 14:48:03   #
tripod
Go to
Feb 16, 2024 13:30:48   #
Probably a better way exists - but I just eMail (full size) to me and then screen copy - have never had any problem - in fact I'll be working on one for a contest this morning
Go to
Feb 16, 2024 13:28:07   #
camerapapi wrote:
Several months ago and during a discussion about RAW data editing I sustained that the reason I was using proprietary software was because it made a difference when printing the files. Proprietary software PRESERVES the original colors of the file. This is not something that came from me, it was what my lab technician told me when I gave him for printing a RAW data converted to JPEG in Affinity Photo.

Several members of the forum argued that my technician was not correct. I keep on using proprietary software to edit my RAW data, Studio NX for Nikon and OM Workspace for Olympus. I sent an email to ON-1 about their RAW data software inquiring if I would get the true color of my files and this was the answer they gave me "We use our own RAW engine, so there will be differences between what you will get in either NX or Olympus software." I got a similar response from Affinity Photo. Nikon told me that their files are not compatible with Affinity Photo. I made no inquiries about Photoshop because I do not use it to edit my files anyways.

I rest my case.
Several months ago and during a discussion about R... (show quote)


In as much as cameras and human eyes don't see things the same way - I don't quite see why you worry about presenting an image "just as your camera saw it"
Go to
Feb 13, 2024 17:25:38   #
I studied with Ansel and he spent much more time creating the image in his mind than he ever did taking the photo - although he carefully planed the photos he wanted to take - there is nothing magic about a straight from the camera image
Go to
Feb 13, 2024 17:21:15   #
I have both, and find cropping from a Sigma 8-16 works better
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 13:51:29   #
When I studied with Ansel Adams he said "The image captured by your camera is only the starting point for creating the image that is in your mind"
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 13:49:03   #
JZA B1 wrote:
I know some people use a lens filter to only let in green light when they want to ultimately convert the image to black and white. That way they get to minimize chromatic aberration and other distortions present when light of widely different wave lengths hits the glass.

But if you take color pictures and later decide to convert them to black and white, do you pick one of the colors or just overall luminance? Or some other system or method?


Photoshop does (to me) a great job - if you use their black and white converter which allows you to adjust each channel
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 13:46:30   #
Way back in my law school days it was "if you do it with your own hands, and for your own use, and don't make any money from it - it is ok"
Go to
Feb 9, 2024 16:57:43   #
RAW
Go to
Feb 8, 2024 13:09:08   #
My Mac Studio has a built in slot - works great
Go to
Feb 8, 2024 13:05:51   #
I always use a macro lens, and of course process the result with Photoshop and topaz - like the result vert much - did not like using a scanner
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 13:16:35   #
You really need to decide if you are a portrait photographer or not - from the history of imaging a rather "this is how a human looks best" concept has emerged - "how would Rembrandt have done this = how would Gainsborough have done this - etc - and what you will find is that they all pretty much agree that "the weight should be here, the head should tip this way - etc - if you somehow thought being a photographer would be easy - well - it isn't - and not only do you have to know these things, you have to do them so well that your subject doesn't even know you are doing them - As Malcom Gladwell said "Only the first ten thousand are hard" - Final thought "The only thing you actually have to photograph is your interaction".
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 13:56:59   #
Yes, if you cash the check you area pro - and it can't go back
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 73 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.