goldstar46 wrote:
Now, to the
So, it comes down to whether you want to be a photographer or just a button pusher? One will produce photographs. The other will be entangled in a constant search for the "next best thing" that will propel them to the heights of photographic accomplishments they couldn't achieve on their own.
--Bob
---------------------------‐------
Very well said Bob.
I fully agree with your philosophy in that it has come to the point where you have individuals who have talent and you have individuals who push a button and wish they had talent.
Many times, I see photographs on Facebook, and on different sites and the presenters of these photographs, and you know they have been created in something like Photoshop or Luminar, and they are posted without explanations.... just to get their.... ooohs and ahs with accolades of how wonderful their photograph is... And what a talented person they are.......
As you indicated, it is a substitution of pushing a button in place of someone having talent but, the individual is willing to accept the accolades as if they did have talent, and that they have true skills in the art of photography... That is just what irks the heck out of me...
In reality, it is not talent as a photographer but, it is actually talent in the ability to use the software and push the right buttons to make people think you captured a unique moment in time, when they, actually in fact, actually created "a fantasy" of something NOT in time....
Yes, the "Preception" of photography has changed....
I do agree, that in the commercial arena, there are times when software and different types of created tivity are necessary to produce financial results.
But, what I dislike is the fact that people are willing to take praise and accolades based upon fake talents and pushing buttons..
Many years ago, I used to be in the diamond jewelry business. And as a merchant, you would never ever sell or present an Altered diamond to a customer without full disclosure. That would have been fraudulent and a complete improper business practice.
In the same light, it would be unthinkable today in the art world to present a fake piece of art as if it was real and expect your client to pay full retail price. Again this is fraudulent and it would be a complete improper business practice. Not to mention the fact app, in the art world you might go to jail...
But in the amateur and uncommercial world of "Photography", it is normal, fair game for anyone to create their fake, false, graphic images and it's OK for somebody to let individuals believe that they are truelly, unique, splendid, moments in time that have been captured by a "Talented Photographer" when that is not the case.
OK,,,, I will get off my soapbox. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and if they want to be a button pusher, they have that right to do that.
You but, that is the way I see it.....
Cheers
GeoVz
####[/quote]