bkyser wrote:
Honestly, when my D-7000 got long in the tooth, I got a D-500 instead of going with the D-7500. The main reason, even though it cost considerably more, is that second card slot. It may mean nothing to 95% of the people out there, but if you don't have that back up slot, and you are shooting for money (in my case, weddings, and some commercial work) then I could be sued for lack of performance. Brides don't care if I said "oops, my memory card failed" Yes, it has happened to me, ONCE, never again...
People do ask (and I don't mind that they do) since I do make money with my equipment, why don't I upgrade to full frame? Well, first, what I have works for me, and I've never had someone complain about the camera I'm using. Secondly, when I moved to digital, I slowly migrated over to digital lenses, and got a lot of 2.8 glass for DX, and I'm not prepared to cut into my livelihood by starting over with all the FF glass I would need to "feed" the full frame camera.
So, that was a very long winded way of saying, only you, not any of us, can determine what is important to you, and what a D-7500 will do for you that your current camera can't. Now, if your camera starts failing you, either by what you wished it could do, or like mine, the shutter started acting up, then make a list of what is important to you, and go from there.
Don't sweat the 4 mp difference, though. That actually makes for slightly larger pixels, which helps with the low light performance, which in my case is really nice. But, if you shoot outside in daylight, means nothing to you.
Honestly, when my D-7000 got long in the tooth, I ... (
show quote)
Well thought out and communicated. Your experience lends you credibility....