Architect1776 wrote:
I use mine on a bellows with my 7D.
I do still have the Bessler 23C in the attic.
My 23CII is in my large storage closet upstairs
tmicro wrote:
This is to replace my Nikon D-7000 which was the most disappointing camera I ever purchased. Time to start enjoying photography again.
I'm with you there!
My D7000 was *totally disappointing* in too many ways. Focus, buffer "speed," low-bypass (AA) filter...- just-- "YUCK."
I watched the D7100, then ended-up getting a D7200 years ago- MUCHO better in *all* features. Like you, I'm glad I didn't let that one "bad apple" Nikon model scare me away from Nikon preference. (started with film Nikons in the 60s) Wish the D7500 had two card slots- I prefer that feature, while some couldn't care less in their workflows...
Happy shooting.
Blenheim Orange wrote:
I have been happy with the Manfrotto tripod I have been using for the last 6 years. It gets a lot of use out in the field. It is very light, and it is easy to extend and retract the legs.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1010692-REG/manfrotto_mt190cxpro3_190cxpro3_carbon_fiber_tripod.html
Mike
I "second" your recommendation; I have this tripod also- most often holding a D7200 with up-to 300mm zooms easily. Add a Manfrotto "490-series" ball head- which has its own plate- so no need to go get all "Arca-Swissed-up." It has "lever action" leg adjustment, which I like better than rotating collars, and is exactly in the OP's price range. It is light, easy to transport, and quite solid when set up properly.
foathog wrote:
So you are just gonna let the asshole get away with it??? They don't have an address for this clown? I'm sure the police don't want to get involved. I've dealt with them before when my place was robbed.
You can get yourself shot these days "confronting" someone...and as you said (I agree from experience as well), recovering stolen goods/arresting perpetrator(s) is about a 1 on a 1-10 scale-of-importance to the police. My wife "lost" a $10k piece of heirloom jewelry to a "professional" dog walker (no way to "prove" she did it), and there is little you can do other than file a police report and deal with the insurance company. You still don't have the objects that were stolen… Sucks.
I hope the OP gets a replacement camera sooner rather than later.
It is "kit lens" that was offered with D7000 series cameras as others have pointed out. However, it is a "step above" plastic-flange kit lenses like the 18-105 both in build and performance. The 18-140 has a *metal* flange I bought one used, and am extremely pleased with it on my D7200. It replaced an 18-105 that has a broken bayonet flange. Contrary to some who say with "careful handling" the flanges won't break – I take great care when changing lenses, and one of the plastic lugs snapped off *anyway.* Cheesy, under-engineered, plastic bayonet flanges are too weak for a lens of this weight. I would absolutely recommend the 18-140 to your friend; it definitely performs better on the D7100 and D7200 than the lower entry-level models (which have AAFilters). I would advise your friend not to pay more than $250 for it. (As an aside – using this lens on a D810 in DX Mode is kind of like putting 87 octane gas in your Ferrari.)
I went from a D7000 to a D7200. In addition to having 24 megapixels, the 7200 has a better focusing software, and much better high speed shot buffering than either of the D7000 or D7100. It does not have an anti-aliasing filter. As you know the D7000 has *two* slots. So does the D7200. The D7500 has the even next-step-up focusing system, and only one memory card slot if that makes a difference to you. I am extremely pleased with my D7200 and not sure that I would trade it for a 7500 to be quite honest. And, I believe, rumor has it that the D500 is already being discontinued by Nikon!?… I vote for the D7200 with some good glass.
Linda From Maine wrote:
Raw are meant to be processed by the photographer using editing software, so there should be no disappointment if one understands what a raw file is relative to a jpg that the camera processes.
Personally, I'm disappointed that my camera doesn't clean my house 😇
Thanks for the chuckle(s)- (*and* for your consistent, salient, knowledgable input to UHH)
josquin1 wrote:
what a joke; limited funds.
Yours is such a constructive comment. *Thank You* for adding positively to this OP's discussion. Please keep it up! Such comments help UHH "newbies" quickly learn that some folks add nothing meaningful to topics.
Smoke Hole "Big Bend" (NOT Texas) might be worthy of consideration. Hiking trails are reasonable/accessible (with care), might require 1/2-mile trek. "Southern" part of WV- Dirt roads. Beautiful macro, landscape vistas. Reservations for campsites required.
Welcome to a group that supports "taking of images." My suggestion is to get an "entry level" camera made by Canon or Nikon. Search sources, evaluate, make a choice. There are many opinions regarding "format" - That doesn't really matter. Good lenses *do* matter.
Szalajj wrote:
Thanks for the link.
I had been puzzling with a DIY version for several years, but I was thinking about a much smaller version. Now I have a better idea of how to make it. I just need to buy a new sewing machine, or I'll just have do it all but hand.
I had borrowed a hood man for a while, but because I use my left eye to look through the viewfinder, it kept getting in the way. I only wanted to be able to review my shots on the LED screen, and it became more of an annoyance than a help. The cloth is a better solution for me. Maybe having it attached to a hat that you just turn around or flip the cloth forward when you need the shade. When it's not in use for the camera, it's shielding your neck from the sun.
Thanks for the link. br br I had been puzzling ... (
show quote)
I was born in NH. Flipping your left eye to the right will "saalve" your left-eye (for whatever reason) problem. The cloth also keeps mosquitos off one's neck.
Rich1939 wrote:
Adding a Hoodman to the live view screen sure works as an EVF for me.
Some folk focus on the tools, some on the art. The tools in-hand are better than tools desired/"required."
Some need a screwdriver; some suggest a sledgehammer
Hoodman