Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Db7423
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 408 next>>
Jan 15, 2016 12:28:59   #
davefales wrote:
I wonder sometimes if people who "drop off" their images at the store realize they could do it all on line.


Yes, but I always liked to talk to the tech and went only when I needed shop for other things. Generally the prints were waiting for me by the time I was checked out and ready to leave- oh well, no more "instant gratification". ;)
Go to
Jan 15, 2016 12:19:48   #
Rick from NY wrote:
Either or. Your choice


Thanks, Rick.
Go to
Jan 15, 2016 09:31:13   #
Bummer. I guess we will pay for digital processing while in the store and the prints will be mailed to us? Or do we have to return to the store to pickup the printing... Do you know? ;)
Go to
Jan 15, 2016 09:18:16   #
Welcome to the Hog, CrystalMonarch. Glad you threw your hat in, have fun and keep shooting. ;)
Go to
Jan 14, 2016 08:48:14   #
juicesqueezer wrote:
I have the Nikon 2.8 version and is one of my most used lenses. Great for portraits and indoor sports. Very sharp for these purposes. Put your left hand under the lens and hold camera with right and I think it balances out very nicely. At 71, I don't see a problem with weight at all.


Ditto and I'm 74. One thing I will add is a monopod is useful when shooting sports as you often have your eye on the viewfinder for fairly long periods when following the action. ;)
Go to
Jan 12, 2016 08:51:19   #
Welcome to the Hog, BB. Where are you in Greece? ;)
Go to
Jan 10, 2016 18:35:46   #
Welcome to the Hog, Peak. Glad you joined us. ;)
Go to
Jan 9, 2016 17:23:00   #
Check this out to see if the D7200 offers anything over the D7100 that would be of value to you.
http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2015/03/02/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100-8-key-differences-need-know/
Something they don't mention is the buffer in the 7200 is larger allowing a longer burst of shots. This is worthwhile if you shoot much action such as sports. Here is a comparison that you might find worthwhile.
http://photographylife.com/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100
;)
Go to
Jan 8, 2016 09:07:05   #
Regis, yet another great capture, am always amazed by your talent. ;)
Go to
Jan 8, 2016 09:02:17   #
Welcome to the Hog, Sara and kudos to Nikonian for his help and encouragement. Your D3300 will carry you a long way, have fun. ;)
Go to
Jan 8, 2016 08:56:37   #
Indeed though I'm still waiting for the babes. ;)
Go to
Jan 8, 2016 08:53:17   #
I have a D7200 and think you will like it as I do. Wouldn't expect to see its replacement causing a price drop anytime soon as Nikon, judging by its recent releases, has been concreting elsewhere lately. ;)
Go to
Jan 7, 2016 09:19:27   #
Gene51 wrote:
You don't need to focus at infinity. You need to focus on the distant objects, then use a depth of field table to help ensure that what you need to be in focus actually is. There is a hyperfocal distance that is combination of settings and distances that provides the greatest depth of field, but you should take that as a suggestion, and with a grain of salt. For critical work, cut the ranges suggested in half.

For instance, the www.dofmaster.com calculator suggests that with your camera, at a focal length of 24mm, at F8, the hyperfocal distance is 11.9 ft. If you focus at that distance, everything from half that distance, or 6 ft to infinity will be in focus. Now it is important to understand that the really distant stuff will not be nearly as crisp and sharp as what is at 12 ft, and your results at 6 ft will not be quite as sharp either, but it will be "acceptable." You would get better results if you stayed exactly where you were, and close the lens down to F11. The calculator suggests that the hyperfocal is 8.43 ft, with 4.2 ft to infinity in focus. Focusing at 11.9 ft the table suggests that everything from 4.93 to infinity will be in focus, so you are within the limits of acceptability.

http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

This is a great resource - and a whole lot better than just "googleing" it as has been suggested. Good luck with this.
You don't need to focus at infinity. You need to f... (show quote)


Just what I was going to recommend (dofmaster) before I got to your post. ;)
Go to
Jan 7, 2016 09:15:25   #
Welcome to the Hog, shahidr100. Glad you joined us. Have fun with your very capable D3100. ;)
Go to
Jan 4, 2016 20:09:08   #
Welcome to the Hog, Broncoian. Jim gave you some good advice.
When you narrow it down to a couple choices do a Googhe search "camera nnn vs. camera ccc" and read the comparisons. You could also come back to the Hog for users opinions on one vs. the other. Good luck. ;)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 408 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.