Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Rich1939
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 340 next>>
Nov 10, 2019 08:43:19   #
ebrunner wrote:
We had a few days off this week, so my wife and I decided to go to the mountains. Alas for three days we had overcast skies with intermittent snow flurries. I checked the weather and Photographer's Ephemeris the night before we were scheduled to leave. The forecast was for partly cloudy and cold. So I got up before dawn on the morning of our departure and drove to a place that I knew would have a good view and the rising sun illuminating the mountains. For this shot I could have used a wide lens; but the mountains were a good distance off and with a wide lens it would have been all foreground and sky with some mountains on the horizon. Instead I put on a 135mm short tele prime lens and made a seven shot pano. That made the mountains more prominent. I like it; but I'll let you decide if I was successful. Only works in download.
Erich
We had a few days off this week, so my wife and I ... (show quote)


Very nice image and I totally agree with your reasoning re lens choice. Panos are relatively easy to do and the difference between them and a print from a wide angle lens can be incredible.
Go to
Nov 10, 2019 08:32:25   #
claytonsummers wrote:
We stopped at Promontory Point on the way to Yellowstone the first week of October. They may be replicas, but they are gorgeous.

More information: http://ibls.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Promontory_locomotives


Very nice!
But, a question, are those engines actually hot or is the smoke from smoke bombs?
Go to
Nov 9, 2019 14:57:56   #
charles tabb wrote:
After reading your reply, I think that an awful lot of people today must be getting weak or something.
Everybody today it seems wants a camera that's super light and a PC to process their files that is blazingly fast.

I myself don't have those desires. I have an ASUS tower ,that I've had for a few years now, and a Sony a99II that weighs like a brick with it's 28-300mm lens.

I just got back last week from a 16 day cruise to Hawaii where I took about 1,000+ pictures on 4 islands and have processed them all. I never had a concern about camera weight or the speed of my PC.

I'm now at 80 years old and ready to do it all again.
After reading your reply, I think that an awful lo... (show quote)


From one Octo to another. "hear, hear"
Long ago and far away I once owned a 65 mustang fastback V8 4 speed trans. Lived in a state with more police than mail men (seemed like). I never had the opportunity to use all that power.
Similar to what we're seeing here, putting a big engine under the hood whose only use is for bragging
Go to
Nov 9, 2019 13:38:08   #
Jim-Pops wrote:
Many of us have trouble learning Photoshop. I think the main reason is we want to do it all right away. As I learn it I take one process at a time. My First step was layers, Next masking, then on to blending. Most people like me can't remember all the steps. I go to YouTube each morning and see what strikes my fancy. I have found Unmesh Dinda with PixPerfect is a great teacher. During each lesson he continues to remind you of the basic short cuts and processes. That what it takes to learn Photoshop, do something then do it again and again and again and finally it starts sink in and be remembered
Today I followed this video and tried it on a current photo that was shot at a local workshop. I also went on and made Unmesh's Action for blending skin as directed. I also created his additional link for skin smoothing as mentioned in the video.
I put my pictures side by side for you to see what the process could do.
Instructional video is here....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQXeFEKPUis
Many of us have trouble learning Photoshop. I thin... (show quote)


As always his videos teach us interesting techniques.

Here's a twist to the skin softening technique you might want to try. Copy the layer, then instead of using filter/blur/ gaussian blur, open the layer in ACR,go to the texture slider and take it to the left to where it 'feels right to you,. Then do the mask and brush thing.
I've tried this a couple of times and am happy with the results. Plus a couple fewer steps.
Go to
Nov 9, 2019 11:53:20   #
FYI
I can work on 200M files with this "Old" computer setup and speed is not an issue. It just gets it done. About the only thing I want to up grade is the video card from a 1G card to a 2G. With Photoshop I have the scratch drive mapped to the SSI HD. That did make a difference.
I am a hobbyist and don't need to process hundreds (or thousands) of photos from a shoot but, even if I did I could only work on one at a time. As an old retiree I fit with a very large percentage of the UHH membership and don't feel that we need all those high end, latest wizz bang components. As I said I can work on 200M (or larger) files without my set up dragging its feet.


Windows 10 (x64) (build 17763)
Install Language: English (United States)

System Model
Enclosure Type: Desktop
Processor a
3.20 gigahertz Intel Core i5-4460
256 kilobyte primary memory cache
1024 kilobyte secondary memory cache
6144 kilobyte tertiary memory cache
64-bit ready
Multi-core (4 total)
Not hyper-threaded

Main Circuit Board b
Board: ASRock H97M Pro4
Serial Number: M80-4B026901811
Bus Clock: 100 megahertz
UEFI: American Megatrends Inc. P1.20 07/29/2014
Drives
2249.59 Gigabytes Usable Hard Drive Capacity
784.87 Gigabytes Hard Drive Free Space

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH24NS50 ATA Device [Optical drive]

Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 SCSI Disk Device (1000.20 GB) -- drive 2, s/n 490987654321
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB [Hard drive] (250.06 GB) -- drive 1, s/n S21NNXAG727264Z, rev EMT01B6Q, SMART Status: Healthy
ST1000DM003-1ER162 [Hard drive] (1000.20 GB) -- drive 0, s/n Z4Y8HEN3, rev CC46, SMART Status: Healthy
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend USB Device [Hard drive] -- drive 3
Memory Modules c,d

16320 Megabytes Usable Installed Memory (RAM)

Slot 'ChannelA-DIMM0' has 4096 MB (serial number 272217CB)
Slot 'ChannelA-DIMM1' has 4096 MB (serial number 27221815)
Slot 'ChannelB-DIMM0' has 4096 MB (serial number 27220DF9)
Slot 'ChannelB-DIMM1' has 4096 MB (serial number 27220E72)
Local Drive Volumes


Display NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 [Display adapter]
Display memory 1G
Go to
Nov 9, 2019 09:03:57   #
billnikon wrote:
The D600 had many problems with oil on the sensor, it was replaced by the D610. Nikon offered a one to one trade on the bad D600's back in the day. (you sent your D600 in and Nikon sent you a D610)
I would stay away from any D600 body.


Bill, I believe you are over reacting and also not entirely correct.
There was a problem but it never affected all the D600s. One,There were and still are many happy owners that never had the problem (I'm e pluribus unum) and in truth they were the majority. The inter net as usual blew the issue way out of proportion.
Two, Nikon offered to replace the shutter on all affected cameras and as pointed out above will honor that until Jan. 2020. If a particular camera proved to be not repairable then they often replaced it with a D610. But that isn't a guaranteed resolution.
Go to
Nov 8, 2019 16:30:09   #
bkyser wrote:
I have a "gaming" laptop and desktop. Both have 2, 1tb SSD drives, one for programs and OS, the other for storage of files I'm using.

Here's something that I found helpful, the graphics card does help to an extent, but often times for photoshop, it runs better if you disable it. I do some video, so I do have a beefed up graphics card, but the thing that helped me most was having 32 gb of DDR4 RAM. Between the awesome amount of ram, and using SSD hard drives, the computers are both screaming fast at boot up, launching Photoshop, which used to take me forever, boots up almost immediately, and doing things like using the smudge tool don't bring everything to a screeching halt.
I have a "gaming" laptop and desktop. B... (show quote)


What bkyser said! I personally feel a gaming PC for photo work is over kill. As much ram as your MB will take and SSD drives are the main areas to upgrade
Go to
Nov 8, 2019 16:21:12   #
repleo wrote:
Finally - the definitive, unbiased, once-and-for-all verdict on this perennial question that has plagued photographers for generations!!! (Yea - sure )

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=rm#inbox/WhctKJVZtbccZFvFhMCBfkBQDBMmsZcmvvbFhfBQQMwmKHwjfgSzzShPwsMcDXrCzMPrTJv

Let the games begin.

I have no dog in this hunt - I am a Sony boy.


What is that link? It sent me to google mail.

For the record there should be zero debate as both cameras are better than 99.9% of us will ever be. (Philosophically speaking)
Go to
Nov 8, 2019 12:17:25   #
carlos C wrote:
Wow thanks so much for your explanation now it make sense. Thank you


Carlos, which explanation? We are all trying to help but we are not really sure of your terminology.
Go to
Nov 8, 2019 11:36:48   #
[quote=MT Shooter]As long as it is NOT a grey market body that is a wonderful price. Nikon will replace the shutter on ALL USA D600 bodies for free so you have no concerns there at all. Go for it, you will love the FF capabilities.

I believe this is no longer true.
I'm incorrect. The program expires as of January 10, 2020
Go to
Nov 7, 2019 16:40:33   #
bkyser wrote:
Bingo! That's what I was going to say. Your camera is doing exactly what it was designed to do. Slow down your shutter speed, or up your ISO, and your image will get brighter if you want to keep it at F11


I don't believe that it will brighten if the OP is using a older manual lens. The live view in that case is showing the stopped down image. With a newer lens the aperture wont stop down until the shutter is squeezed. The image will also go dark if the operator is using the preview button while looking at the live view image.
Go to
Nov 7, 2019 13:14:50   #
carlos C wrote:
Hi I’m new at this forum and I would like to post a question for every who was more experience in photography than me since I’m just a beginner. The question that I have is what are the major pros and cons in regards to shooting TTL and shooting TTR, recently I had found several YouTube videos in which in says is better than the other but don’t give a clear tangible explanation of why one is or is not better than the other. Can somebody with years of field experience share his knowledge about this topic will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Hi I’m new at this forum and I would like to post ... (show quote)


I'm going to take a guess. TTR to the right, TTL to the left. Both normally preceded by "expose". Since you are new, you get the benefit of the doubt from me.
Exposing to the right when done while controlling how far to the right will allow you to give more exposure to the image with out blowing out the hi lights. Digital cameras have more latitude in the shadows and you can often expose to the left without sacrificing (too much) shadow detail and is done when highlight detail is the primary concern.
Left and right in this sense refer to which direction the histogram moves in relation to your exposure adjustment

PS exposing to the right can result in less image noise, to the left more
Go to
Nov 7, 2019 08:40:54   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Sounds like you are using an old MF lens with an aperture ring. In that case it's doing what it's supposed to do.


Go to
Nov 7, 2019 08:35:29   #
DaveO wrote:
I would buy a special dog first.


Heartless and humorless
Go to
Nov 7, 2019 08:34:58   #
joer wrote:
The 300 2.8 is much better optically than the 200-500 but neither will improve your vision. Spend your money on glasses or contact lenses and you will be able to see what to focus on.


Cold.
There are sr. eye conditions that can not be aided.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 340 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.