Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: In-lightened
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 49 next>>
Aug 23, 2020 13:02:00   #
RWR wrote:
I’m not sure you could tell the difference. The illustrations given here reinforce my opinion of digital imaging - the more one knows about artificial manipulation in post, the less one needs to know about photography.


Not sure I would agree with you on this one. Nothing subs for clean, crisp detail around an eye or in the feathers....but if said bird moves and your shutter speed is lower than ideal for ISO reasons, it sure does a better job than LR in cleaning up the noise and sharpening. Each and every time. And the stabilize is useful here too. Wouldn't print these images but they work.
Go to
Aug 22, 2020 10:38:00   #
Thanks for posting! I use this all of the time and appreciate the stabilize option when needed. However, I do notice artifacts when zoomed in. Not so much in full screen image. Has anyone found what helps this? Or price we pay.....I've tried the auto mode and then also adjusting how much it sharpens.
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 10:07:22   #
cactuspic wrote:
There are specific processes for which you don't want to expose to the right or to maximize the exposure. In particular, you don't want to do it while focus stacking. In focus stacking, you want to leave a little headroom on your highs. The reason has to do with the out of focus highlight and the fact that when you take a frame where those highlight are in focus, they will register much brighter.

For an example, when a test chart is in focus, the contrast between white and black is at it's highest and the whites are their whitest. As it becomes more defocused, a blending between the black and white occurs and a graying takes place. If its totally out of focus the chart will become a uniform shade of gray. a real world example of this occurence is when we shoot wide open to knock out the detail in the background, we are blending the light in the background so that the highs and lows are no longer distinct.

Although there is a small leeway for exposure differences between individual images in the stack, the software works best when the same exposure is used for the entire stack. As it is likely that there are highlights that will be brighter when in focus than in the first image of the stack, you want to set your exposure before the blinkies. You don't want to expose to the right.

I realize theat focus stacking is a bit of a niche. But as more and more cameras have focus stacking as a feature, it's usage is growing. Therefor, the general rules that we use for exposure (blinkies, ETTR) may have to be modified. I don't recall any such caveat in all the posts on exposure.
There are specific processes for which you don't w... (show quote)


This was really helpful for me. Thanks!
Go to
Aug 8, 2020 09:04:20   #
Great images and nice compositions! My favs are 5, 6, 7...couldn't chose. Is there nice fall color around this mill?
Go to
Jul 11, 2020 09:41:27   #
CO wrote:
Do you want a DX or FX sensor Nikon? I had a D7000. I sold it not long ago and purchased a D7500. The D7500 has a better autofocus system and improved sensor. It only has a single memory card slot but that's not a big deal. I already had two D500's and a D750 but I wanted another mid-level camera. Nikon has finally figured out the best place for the ISO button.


The well placed ISO button is a game changer for wildlife photography. That is why I replaced my d7100. Love the D500!
Go to
Jul 7, 2020 09:28:26   #
Love, love this lens on my D500 for chasing warblers and other flity flighty birds...never enough reach. Or on the D850 if stalking shore birds. Sharp, light weight and can hike with it all day. One of Nikon's best for sure! It's rare that I find myself with too much lens due to my subject obsession.
Go to
Jun 23, 2020 08:44:38   #
jeffhacker wrote:
my problem is more the card reader than the media or the camera. Not sure why but XQD readers seem a bit weird. I can't get the computer to recognize the reader


I have gone through numerous XQD card readers...dont know why. They just stop working. If its duel, the SD part seems to function. Ugh
Go to
Jun 10, 2020 18:58:34   #
Hanson wrote:
Can I run AI Clear after I run AI DeNoise before saving?


Not in my experience. You would have to save and return the image. One or the other is all that is needed.
Go to
Jun 8, 2020 11:29:43   #
suntouched wrote:
I'm glad this topic came up. It must be me BUT I have tried both the Denoise and AI Sharpen with disappointing results. I say it must be ME because everyone that has posted is loving it! One particular image I was trying to improve was just slightly off focus and using all three modes of AI Sharpen did not really improve sharpness overall and in fact added some strange artifacts. Then I thought well I will download the trial of AI Denoise and concluded that the same results can be obtained through OnOne or PS Camera Raw module. I used the auto and manual modes but certainly didn't get the results marketed. Any tips?
I'm glad this topic came up. It must be me BUT I h... (show quote)


I am with you on the Sharpen aspect of that AI program and I don't use it. Somebody else eluded to the Stabilize and Focus features of this being best used on images that are almost there. This is true in my experience. I try them both, keep one and compare it to what AI clear (an option in the AI Denoise software) will do. I have yet to figure out why some images end up with way too many artifacts (in the AI Sharpen software with stabilize or focus) while others have few. And sometimes, the results have been worth a few artifacts that aren't noticeable unless you zoom in. I don't see this problem with AI Clear and it sometimes offers just enough focus correction...say the bill of a bird since it is a different plane of focus than the eyes. I have almost finished a set of images from a south Texas trip with a fishing Reddish Egret, white morph. What a handsome bird....I'm a bird nerd so it's easy to get me going about sharpness. Ugh. The AI technology just gives a pop to an already good image. I will post some of these to my Flikr page later in the week. My newest edge of growth is just post the very best and not all of them that I like. Always something, right?
Go to
Jun 8, 2020 08:36:20   #
I really like this program as well. Sometimes, AI Clear does a better job and seems to bring some things into focus a bit better while removing noise. The Sharpen AI program sometimes adds artifacts so AI Clear is often a good choice. Buckle up if you don't have a good GPU or grab coffee and develop some patience. AI is here to say and I am betting Adobe ups the game as time goes by with more than what they are using now.
Go to
Jun 7, 2020 09:00:56   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
When "very close to main subject," you need to do small areas, with small brush, and zoom in very closely. Also, varying opacity can help. Think multiple layers of paint when you're doing a room.

Thanks for noticing my new "much photoshopped" mug

Don't forget there is a Post-Processing Forum on UHH:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-116-1.html

Come by anytime and we can work on individual tasks you want to accomplish. Small bites, one day at a time.
When "very close to main subject," you n... (show quote)


I always appreciate your tips and your kindness Linda.
Go to
Jun 5, 2020 10:58:49   #
I had an ASUS laptop for travel that aged out of function due to graphics card as well. I purchased a Razor 13" laptop to replace it a couple of years ago. Topaz AI software needs a dedicated GPU with 4MG of dedicated RAM. For now, the Razor is hanging in but it is slower when using this type of software. Not a big issue for me as I usually due most of my process work on my desktop. For the occasional want to get it to post, it is fine.

I just replaced my desktop with a custom build that I can upgrade down the road. Expensive but worth the investment now. Here is some information on the NVIDIA card I chose. My son made suggestions (hes a gamer and has used PS from his graphic/arts degree) together but he insisted I do some research on various components. This desktop system returns a Topaz AI Sharpen file with in seconds. https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Nvidia-RTX-2080/Rating/4026

I think understanding the requirements of the software you run will tell you which laptop will work for you.
Go to
Jun 3, 2020 10:31:29   #
I have had that issue a few times. Twice cleaning the contacts on camera and lens solved the issue. The other time it was cable in the lens and had to go to Nikon. Fingers crossed it's dirty contacts. I use the 90% alcohol you can find in pharmacy section.
Go to
Jun 3, 2020 10:28:40   #
I have used MPIX to make our yearly calendars for Christmas gifts. Fast, excellent quality in paper and printing. The interface is easy to use as well. Good luck!
Go to
Jun 2, 2020 09:23:53   #
Custer wrote:
Thanks very much for replying. I'm shooting outdoor landscapes with the lens that came with the kit, 24-120mm.


Ohhh...with landscape and low light you need a tripod for slow shutter speeds. Many are very happy with the 24-120 lens. It is a very good one. You will also need a good ballhead. So that we know who you are responding to, use the quote reply.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 49 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.