Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: forjava
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 27 next>>
Mar 24, 2016 13:51:49   #
Was expecting this suggestion: "expose for the highlights setting a narrow acceptance angle like spot"

But my takeaway from the other responses is that feathers can be a special case requiring negative EV, above and beyond.

I'll keep that in mind next time I get an assignment to shoot S&M products, in nearby San Francisco.

George Kravis wrote:
Simple; expose for the highlights setting a narrow acceptance angle like spot metering. Then while viewing the image on your monitor, you can brighten the under exposed areas in any one of the post processing programs.


8-)
Go to
Mar 21, 2016 16:13:03   #
A composition desideratum is to find an interesting or unexpected angle. The thoughtless composition would have shot the front of the open box. This is way better.

Like the out-of-focus foreground.

The two versions tell different stories.

It is hard for me to know when highlights are just right or intrusive. I wonder if a circular polarizing filter or a different angle from the LED source would be worth exploring.

What's with the mostly illegible Spanish-language text at the upper left? See magnified download. Looks like a hand-made label. Maybe Photoshop could reveal it.
Go to
Mar 21, 2016 14:22:09   #
Snakes. Was watching Lonesome Dove's water moccasin (That's a rattlesnake variant.) scene of pioneer Texas yesterday. Thought to myself, there were so many rattlers even when I grew up in Texas, what must it have been like nearly 200 years ago? My cocker spaniel contstantly killed them in our back yard. Easter egg hunts always prefaced with a productive snake hunt. Snakes swimming in flooded streets. ...

My worst experience was while swimming in Beaver Creek, which feeds the Llano River. I was sitting in an inner tube. Grabbed a bunch of tall grass on the bank to pull myself in and exposed a water moccasin coiled and sunning itself. Disturbed, it slithered into the water beside me. No point in trying to describe the next thirty seconds, but I'm still here.

We kids always debated whether these snakes can bite while swimming. We had to conclude they could not or we'd have never gone swimming.
Go to
Mar 17, 2016 18:18:17   #
You might out-design them and offer them your intellectual property.
Make a feature table that compares yours and theirs. Do something unique and critical, based on input from camera people like me. I see your effort as a good start on a workflow problem whose solution is worth money.
MMC wrote:
Thank you for link. Unfortunately I can not compete with Manfrotto.

:oops:
Go to
Mar 17, 2016 16:29:51   #
Don't know how to delete the repeated post...

Here you go: https://www.manfrotto.us/catalogsearch/result/?q=cross+arm

What I did not say:
* Got a Bogen tripod for its crank center column; trying to figure out the mechanical fittings ... hoping to diddle the tripod legs less often
* The load gets bigger than you'd think so a strong tripod and head are needed
* A related issue is changing the camera (sensor) orientation conveniently, between landscape and portrait

MMC wrote:
Thanks for looking, your compliments and comments. Can you post link to your commercial arm?
Go to
Mar 17, 2016 16:29:49   #
Here you go: https://www.manfrotto.us/catalogsearch/result/?q=cross+arm

What I did not say:
* Got a Bogen tripod for its crank center column; trying to figure out the mechanical fittings ... hoping to diddle the tripod legs less often
* The load gets bigger than you'd think so a strong tripod and head are needed
* A related issue is changing the camera (sensor) orientation conveniently, between landscape and portrait

MMC wrote:
Thanks for looking, your compliments and comments. Can you post link to your commercial arm?
Go to
Mar 17, 2016 14:15:01   #
I totally admire this. Your work is neat and it looks like it could be a commercial product.

A cross-arm is super-useful if you don't want to move your tripod and reconfigure it. I have Manfrotto's four-head cross arm and am not totally satisfied. Still, it is better than moving my tripod's center column from vertical to horizontal.

In your prior post you have your arm on a ball head. I'm in the minority of shooters worried about slippage. My commercial arm, attached to a tripod, has to hold a geared head (no slippage), a two-way focus rail, and a FF camera-lens. A counterweight would be good but I don't want to go there.
Go to
Mar 15, 2016 13:57:46   #
DC lenses are not a solution for problematic skin in portraits. These lenses retain subject sharpness and soften the out-of-focus areas, for a chosen DoF.

I've been researching the 85mm DC and 105mm DC as a possible buy. DC allows added control of the areas outside the area of focus. That is, you can further defocus in front of or behind the sharp focus the DC lens provides, regardless of aperture short of the whole frame being in focus.

Unlike the DC controls, a soft-focus lens -- Nikon has made three -- softens the whole frame.

On a lighthearted note, yesterday I saw a portrait of a woman, but the image had been photobombed by a german shepherd defecating in the background. See Dogtime.com, item 7. A DC lens could have saved this shot.

amfoto1 wrote:
I shoot Canon gear now, so am obviously not using the current versions of the Nikkor 105mm....

But I've used vintage versions of it in the past and it's a legendary quality macro lens. You should find it fantastic. Macro lenses around 90 to 105mm focal length are a good compromise of good working distance from your subjects, yet still reasonably hand-holdable.

Like any macro lens, you'll have to experiment with balancing shallow depth of field against using a very small apertures that cause loss of fine detail due to diffraction. Might want to learn about using "focus stacking" (check out Helicon Focus software website for more info).

If you got the VR version of the lens, don't expect too much from the image stabilization at the lens' highest magnification levels. It's just limited how much stabilization is able to do, at high mags... though it can be quite effective when using the lens for lower magnification shots or non-macro purposes. Monopods and tripods continue to be very useful accessories for macro work. Macro flash is another way to deal with the challenges of high magnification work.

Some folks use the 105mm and other macro lenses for portraiture, too. Personally I think many of them are actually too sharp for that purpose. Even a 17 year old model with "perfect" skin who's just spent an hour with talented make-up artist is likely to need some retouching. Your mother-in-law might really hate portraits of her made with a macro lens. (And I believe there's a Nikkon 105mm "DC" specifically made for portraiture, instead of macro... I sometimes use a Tamron 60/2.0 macro/portrait that has larger aperture than most macro lenses and is a little more forgiving, too, but is a crop-only/DX lens.)

Have fun learning to use the lens. Overall it's a fantastic macro lens.

If you're brand new to macro, it's a huge and diverse specialization with a lot to learn. There are some great books out there by a number of authors that I highly recommend. If you can find it, start with John Shaw's "Close-ups in Nature", which is as close as you'll get to a macro "Bible". But there are more excellent books from Jim Brandenberg, Mary and Joe MacDonald, Nial Benvie, Bryan Peterson, Heather Angel, Jim Zuckerman and more. Many (most? all?) of these are nature and wildlife photographers... but the same macro principles and techniques apply to shooting most any type of small subject.
I shoot Canon gear now, so am obviously not using ... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 15, 2016 13:34:37   #
There is a lot of commentary here about apertures, focal length, and angle of view. It is often forgotten that getting close with Nikkor micro lenses can cause changes from the headline specs.

For example, the 105mm f/2.8 AFD is 105mm on FX at infinity and is f/2.8 at infinity. At macro distance, this lens acts as an 80mm focal-length lens. Likewise, the aperture becomes f/5 at life-size, courtesy of Nikon.

A note on my experience with my G version: At macro distances, you may find auto focus won't happen, especially if there is little contrast between subject and background. This is not a defect. Of course, manual focus comes to the rescue in this case. Sometimes the lens is unresponsive due to user failure to reset the switches, for example, from MF to AF.
Go to
Mar 15, 2016 12:54:37   #
Laughing, but it's serious.

My main tripods are Bogen and Manfrotto. That's not good enough. Think about it:

1. I'm installing 32 square feet of interlocking padded flooring squares today in my studio. A 32 sq. ft. area covers where things in use or staged -- not stored -- could fall to the floor.
Cost? $10.

2. Already have loose safety straps installed for my lights. One accident already avoided. "Straps" are binder's twine tied with slip-adjustable clove-hitch knots.
Cost? $0

3. Due to possible quakes here, there are issues for stored lenses. My numerous lenses were stored at chest level on a shelf, for ready access. Handy but not good. Although the lenses-in-waiting are in lidded, stiff plastic tubs with cushioning, quake etiquette says they belong on the floor under a strong table.
Cost? $0
Go to
Mar 12, 2016 19:22:02   #
Zero grain, period; per the book.
Substitute quinoa, amaranth, lentils, almond flour.
42 pounds talking here...
Go to
Mar 7, 2016 13:20:09   #
Welcome.

Now, excuse me; gotta check my stock of Nanaimo Bars!
Go to
Mar 6, 2016 22:57:24   #
The Valley.
Go to
Mar 6, 2016 22:37:56   #
A photography adventure story about the Hubble telescope:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=2144

Other disasters were avoided before launch. An engineer in Palo Alto built a visual simulation of mechanical movements. The sim showed a critical task to be impossible.

The project manager often whipped out his slide rule when a question came up in a meeting; he’d develop an immediate answer, to the chagrin of the computer jockeys.

Hubble out-performed its design the other day, after fifteen years, imaging closer to the Big Bang, as only the unfinished Webb telescope is designed to do. http://jwst.nasa.gov/recentaccomplish.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3475182/Galaxy-smashes-cosmic-distance-record-set-astronomers.html
Go to
Mar 6, 2016 15:13:49   #
SharpShooter wrote:
What do you expect, I shoot Canon!! :lol:

ultra-micro-nikkor 1.8 28mm !!!

I bought a camera bag full of junk for $5, that lens was in that bag(I was after the bag!!) !!!
SS


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 27 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.