Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Dslr to mirrorless
Page <<first <prev 4 of 16 next> last>>
Jun 17, 2022 06:08:55   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Very shortly now, we'll have trouble remembering cameras ever were burdened by mirrors.


Really, not me. As a landscape photographer, and a BIG mirrorless user, my D850 is my primary landscape camera. And will be for years and years ahead. SO, years from now, I will not only be remembering my DSLR, I will be using it.
You really should be careful making all of your frivolous comments. A troll does not become you, you are better than that. Why downgrade yourself in front of your peers, you are so much better than that.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 06:17:31   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
During all of my photography life I have used conventional cameras and YES I have also used many years ago a rangefinder camera with no mirror. Around 2001 I bought a second hand Olympus Pen EPL-1 with a kit lens. I could not believe that such a small thing were so capable.
When I traveled with it for the first time I saw the conveniences of carrying so a small camera body. Sooner than I had expected I began to use the camera more and more, specially for traveling.

It has been a great experience. Today I have two Olympus mirrorless camera with an assortments of lenses from Olympus and Panasonic and I could not be happier. I like and use my dSLR cameras but using the mirrorless bodies is a totally different experience.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 06:54:14   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
When people look at an image from a mirrorless camera, they feel the difference not just in their eyes, but in the depth of their heart.


Hold your watches up folks.....It's getting DEEP in here.

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2022 06:59:49   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Don't let the photographer you were yesterday stop you from buying a mirrorless camera tomorrow.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 07:27:52   #
EJMcD
 
At the risk of being too succinct, I'm still satisfied with my D5.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 08:49:31   #
Jimmy T Loc: Virginia
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Things work out best for those with the mirrorless cameras.


Concur!!!
Besides, I always carry extra batteries.
No, I wouldn't go back.
Mirrorless makes me . . .
Smile,
JimmyT Sends

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 08:57:31   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
I'm impressed most by the sharper crisp images due to improved lens designs, focusing & reduced flange to sensor distance. Also, the computer parlance phrase WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) I think applies to mirrorless cameras and it is a significant benefit to mirrorless. The tonality of exposure settings on the image are now visible in the EVF so you get more information than just an exposure level or curve. There are others too but these are the most significant to me.

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2022 09:11:14   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
I was curious about mirrorless and tested the waters with a Nikon Z50. Coming from Nikon DSLR's, the transition was painless and I had no difficulty making the move. My D800E and D3S have gotten almost no usage since. I liked it so much that I ended up buying a Z7ii.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 09:14:50   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
User ID wrote:
Not relevant at all. Read that post again, twice, slowly, and out loud. You will see.


Okay. I see.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 09:23:33   #
Guyserman Loc: Benton, AR
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
When people look at an image from a mirrorless camera, they feel the difference not just in their eyes, but in the depth of their heart.



Reply
Jun 17, 2022 09:25:19   #
User ID
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
I never quite understood why people say they never looked back, because by mentioning that you used to use DSLR for 40 years, you looked back. By the way, MILC's and DSLR's do the exact same thing, they record digital images. The way they go about it may be different, but in the end the printer or computer screen or monitor used for viewing the images, doesn't really care whether the image was recorded by a DSLR or an MILC. The news companies that have upgraded there equipment have done so because of financial incentives, not because MILC's are better than DSLR's. We're not talking about fine art photography.
I currently own over 20 DSLR's that all work, the oldest of which is a Canon EOS 10D and the newest is a Nikon D850. My very first digital camera, a Sony Mavica that I bought in the spring of 2001, has no reflex mirror which makes it a mirrorless camera. I still have it and it still works. I own several digital cameras that do not have reflex mirrors, which makes them mirrorless cameras. I also own a couple MILC's and have just ordered the new Canon R7. It will take the place of my 90D for wildlife photography, but I will still use the 90D because it's a good camera and it works fine. I own a whole bunch of those light grey with a crimson band Canon EF lenses, and several black ones with the crimson band. Also several Canon EF and EF-S lenses with both gold and silver bands. Plus a couple Tamron SP and Sigma Sport and Contemporary lenses, for both Canon and Nikon. I also own 10 Nikkor lenses. I have some EF-M glass and several Canon, Nikon, Sigma, Tamron and Kenko teleconverters and EF to M and EF to RF adapters. I haven't purchased any RF glass yet, but eventually will.
Bottom line, cameras are tools and toys to me. I've been doing photography for over 50 years and will continue to do so for as long as I can. DSLR, MILC, Bridge, Super Zooms, it doesn't matter to me, as long as they work and I'm happy with the results. I did a job last month at a religious organization that was celebrating their 100th anniversary. There were a couple hundred people there and not one of them asked me if the cameras I was using had mirrors in them. By the way, both cameras did, a Canon 5D mk IV and a Nikon D850. Of the over 500 photos I shot, about 98% were in focus and properly exposed. Not bad for such obsolete technology.
I never quite understood why people say they never... (show quote)

40 years ??!?!!??? Reeeeally ??!?!?

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2022 09:40:11   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
I've heard that a mirrorless camera will change the way that you view the world.😜

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 09:42:49   #
Jeffcs Loc: Myrtle Beach South Carolina
 
I went from Nikon D5 & D500 to Sony A9 & A6600 and Olympus Omdem1mk3
I’m so glad I did I haven’t found any reasons why I would prefer the old pentaprisim of SLR/DSLR

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 09:46:14   #
Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona
 
I mainly shoot action (birds). The focusing speed and accuracy plus the relatively high frame rate is a huge advantage. If I were just doing static subjects, I would most likely continue to be satisfied with my Canon 5DIV DSLR.

Reply
Jun 17, 2022 10:07:36   #
drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut
 
tgreenhaw wrote:
I have not used my Canon 5Ds since I got my R5


I have not used my D7100 in the year since I bought my Z6. Not going back.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.