Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Posting an image... Context?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Sep 30, 2019 16:47:21   #
lev29 Loc: Born and living in MA.
 
Rongnongno wrote:
When I see image posted I only glance at them unless there is a background information on them as it gives a context and inform.
The fallacy that a picture is worth a thousand word is obvious.
Sorry, Rongnongo, but your "proclamation" is just plain flat out wrong! That may be your approach to reviewing images posted on the Hog, but that’s not mine under most circumstances! MUST there be annotation present? Why?

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 17:05:38   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I don't (mind).
Thanks! While we're waiting for Gene and quixdraw I will mention a topic I posted to Landscape Forum in December:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-568231-1.html

There are many thoughtful and well written responses there, and it is well worth reading for those interested in the different ways people interpret photos when not given any context or direction by the OP.

Here is one photo I shared that produced quite varied responses, which seemed to come from people's personal experiences regarding winter and open land (isolation). In other words, they wrote their own stories.


(Download)

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 17:07:32   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
Bobspez wrote:
None of my pics has a story I want to share except for the iso, aperture, shutter speed and focal length. I have art reproductions and original water colors and acrylics that I have purchased all over my walls and don't have a story for any of them. One of my favorites is this print of a bull and a picador by Picasso. The painting is the story. I don't know what else can be said.


Well, your painting title is 'Before the thrust'. This is the prelude to a 'corrida'. The bull is driven to a frenzy by men mounted on horses (now protected). Their other purpose is to tire the bull (loss of blood) so that it is easier to kill... These men were called 'picadors'.

In your image the man is using a lance to draw blood.

Other men on foot furthers the bull injuries by using 'banderillas' which are barbed so that they not only stay in the wound by prevent the bull muscles to work correctly creating pain. Sometime the matador himself plants banderillas onto the bull neck muscles.

Of note: As a few decades ago the US started to export a great number of semi wild horses used in corridas. Most are killed during training or fighting.

So, your idea that your painting has nothing to say other 'than exist' for your pleasure is false. You are just not interested enough. By the way, the lithograph you have is part of Picasso 'bull period' which has not explained but appears to be related to fascism and 'machismo'.

'Machismo' is another complex subject.

So, from your painting that you eagerly dismiss a lot can be learned and then some.

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2019 17:39:22   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Thanks! While we're waiting for Gene and quixdraw I will mention a topic I posted to Landscape Forum in December:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-568231-1.html

There are many thoughtful and well written responses there, and it is well worth reading for those interested in the different ways people interpret photos when not given any context or direction by the OP.

Here is one photo I shared that produced quite varied responses, which seemed to come from people's personal experiences regarding winter and open land (isolation). In other words, they wrote their own stories.
Thanks! While we're waiting for Gene and quixdraw ... (show quote)


Don't get these often - people unknown to me, some vividness or element of tension that implies a story. Not knowing the facts, I can tell myself a story in my own context. Possibly it won't work for you.







Reply
Sep 30, 2019 17:42:08   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
quixdraw wrote:
Don't get these often - people unknown to me, some vividness or element of tension that implies a story. Not knowing the facts, I can tell myself a story in my own context. Possibly it won't work for you.
A story popped into my head pretty quickly about #3 #2 has all kinds of possibilities also. Thanks so much!

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 19:19:42   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
lev29 wrote:
Sorry, Rongnongo, but your "proclamation" is just plain flat out wrong! That may be your approach to reviewing images posted on the Hog, but that’s not mine under most circumstances! MUST there be annotation present? Why?


I did not say 'it MUST be present'. If you read correctly, I just dismiss those as lacking background. When I shoot something I have a reason that the viewer does not know. I have shot fields of wheat, grass and recently peanut prior to being loaded in a truck.

These images are not gratuitous. I give the background as it is impossible to know what the heck went on on these fields unless one has been there. I also try to give an idea of my reflections at the time.

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 19:21:34   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
Do tell the story of this...



Basically you have three roads.

The one on the left was actually a railroad that has been transformed into a dirt road for folks to enjoy. Typically these go for miles unless they go through a town, in which cases they disappear to reappear on the other side.

In the middle a bridge was constructed to go over the railroad. Now this too is reserved for pedestrians and cycles. Walking on it is my government.

On the right is a modern road.

By the way, this is where I took the 'weed' picture. It was further back on the left.

Oh, yeah, overcast. Did not have any rain thought.

JPG

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2019 19:34:10   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
Rongnongno. All you say is interesting. I only learned the title of the painting today by searching for it on the internet. I've enjoyed the painting for more than 40 years without knowing anything about it.The thing that always fascinated me about the pic is the way Picasso expressed the tension between the man on horseback and the bull with just a few brushstrokes in just a few colors. That puff of steam coming out of the bull's nostrils and the slouched ease of the man on horseback and the alertness of the horse is what I have seen and appreciated. None of the story mattered then or now.
Rongnongno wrote:
Well, your painting title is 'Before the thrust'. This is the prelude to a 'corrida'. The bull is driven to a frenzy by men mounted on horses (now protected). Their other purpose is to tire the bull (loss of blood) so that it is easier to kill... These men were called 'picadors'.

In your image the man is using a lance to draw blood.

Other men on foot furthers the bull injuries by using 'banderillas' which are barbed so that they not only stay in the wound by prevent the bull muscles to work correctly creating pain. Sometime the matador himself plants banderillas onto the bull neck muscles.

Of note: As a few decades ago the US started to export a great number of semi wild horses used in corridas. Most are killed during training or fighting.

So, your idea that your painting has nothing to say other 'than exist' for your pleasure is false. You are just not interested enough. By the way, the lithograph you have is part of Picasso 'bull period' which has not explained but appears to be related to fascism and 'machismo'.

'Machismo' is another complex subject.

So, from your painting that you eagerly dismiss a lot can be learned and then some.
Well, your painting title is 'Before the thrust'. ... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 20:18:41   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Rongnongno wrote:
...I give the background as it is impossible to know what the heck went on on these fields unless one has been there. I also try to give an idea of my reflections at the time.
The first respondent to your thread suggested you prefer photojournalism. From your comments here, it seems more that you are talking about photo essays, where both "narrative and pictures drive the story."

In 2016 in For Your Consideration, MinnieV provided information on how to create a Photo Story. Note the links from St3v3M in the second post that were submissions by a bunch of us

The adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" has an interesting origin (advertising) and I don't think anyone takes it as a singular Great Truth. It's just one way to express photography as art or to be used as a goal in creating an image if that is what interests the photographer.

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 20:20:34   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
The first respondent to your thread suggested you prefer photojournalism. From your comments here, it seems more that you are talking about photo essays, where both "narrative and pictures drive the story."

In 2016 in For Your Consideration, MinnieV provided instruction on how to create a Photo Story here. Her own example is here.

The adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" has an interesting origin (advertising) and I don't think anyone takes it as a singular Great Truth. It's just one way to express photography as art.
The first respondent to your thread suggested you ... (show quote)



Reply
Sep 30, 2019 23:04:46   #
srt101fan
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Well, your painting title is 'Before the thrust'. This is the prelude to a 'corrida'. The bull is driven to a frenzy by men mounted on horses (now protected). Their other purpose is to tire the bull (loss of blood) so that it is easier to kill... These men were called 'picadors'.

In your image the man is using a lance to draw blood.

Other men on foot furthers the bull injuries by using 'banderillas' which are barbed so that they not only stay in the wound by prevent the bull muscles to work correctly creating pain. Sometime the matador himself plants banderillas onto the bull neck muscles.

Of note: As a few decades ago the US started to export a great number of semi wild horses used in corridas. Most are killed during training or fighting.

So, your idea that your painting has nothing to say other 'than exist' for your pleasure is false. You are just not interested enough. By the way, the lithograph you have is part of Picasso 'bull period' which has not explained but appears to be related to fascism and 'machismo'.

'Machismo' is another complex subject.

So, from your painting that you eagerly dismiss a lot can be learned and then some.
Well, your painting title is 'Before the thrust'. ... (show quote)


Your comments are noteworthy. So is Bobspez's response. He clearly appreciates the artistic value of the painting and gave you specific features that appeal to him.

You described the brutality of bullfighting but to the aficionados it is much more complex than that. It is (at least was) a highly admired endeavour deeply ingrained in the Spanish psyche. But why should knowledge of any of that be important in the appreciation of the painting?

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2019 00:01:27   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
srt101fan wrote:
.../... But why should knowledge of any of that be important in the appreciation of the painting?

It is called 'depth'.

If we are not curious about what surrounds us we are basically dead, in my opinion. When I like or dislike something I want to know why.

I described the 'corrida' as violent because it is. It is also one sided, tilted toward the matador. I did not condemn or made any positive comment because it is not for me to do so. And... Yes, in some European countries Spain, Portugal, south of France it is to a great or lesser extent a traditional event.

Do you not find interesting that Bobspez looked up his art work origin once the notion of context was raised? He suddenly became curious after decades of having it on his wall. I hope it adds to his pleasure of looking at it.

Wanting to know more does not take away from one's enjoyment, it adds to it.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 00:14:59   #
bellgamin Loc: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Ah mon chéri, mais c'est vrai. Une image vaut mieux que mille mots.
Wow! How did you get a picture of my mother-in-law?

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 09:13:10   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
A story popped into my head pretty quickly about #3 #2 has all kinds of possibilities also. Thanks so much!


I see what you mean about #3. She is obviously saying,
"Thanks for not embarrassing me by dropping me off right in front of school, dad, and for understanding that this is what all the girls are wearing now."
That's what you meant, right?

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 09:14:03   #
srt101fan
 
Rongnongno wrote:
It is called 'depth'.

If we are not curious about what surrounds us we are basically dead, in my opinion. When I like or dislike something I want to know why.

I described the 'corrida' as violent because it is. It is also one sided, tilted toward the matador. I did not condemn or made any positive comment because it is not for me to do so. And... Yes, in some European countries Spain, Portugal, south of France it is to a great or lesser extent a traditional event.

Do you not find interesting that Bobspez looked up his art work origin once the notion of context was raised? He suddenly became curious after decades of having it on his wall. I hope it adds to his pleasure of looking at it.

Wanting to know more does not take away from one's enjoyment, it adds to it.
It is called 'depth'. br br If we are not curious... (show quote)


Nobody is arguing against curiosity and wanting to know more. I just don't agree that you have to have background information to get interested in and appreciate an image.

We disagree, but I appreciate your comments and the opportunity they give me to sharpen my own thinking on this interesting subject...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.