davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel

In case this poster has forgotten Sony makes televisions and movies while Canon is an imaging empire. It is very easy to "think out of the box" that you have never been in.

Bridges Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA

The best camera system for any individual depends on several criteria. How does the camera feel in your hand, how many bells and whistles are desired vs. how many are actually needed/used, what is your confidence in the equipment, what is your experience with earlier versions of the same manufacturer, how invested are you in the system you are presently using, what is your budget, and how are you going to use the camera all play a factor. As an example, I picked up a Sony a7ii a couple of years ago along with an a6000 and three or four lenses. I loved the camera paired with the 24-240 lens and enjoyed shooting with that combination so much that if I were starting from scratch, I would have continued to build a Sony system. When Nikon introduced the z system I felt they were on the right track but still held onto the Sony. Then when they released the ii series I felt Nikon had essentially caught up with Sony and not wanting to build a second system, and being heavily invested in the Nikon system, I sold off the Sony equipment. Yes, the Sony does track better but since I do not shoot enough sports or wildlife the Sony advantage was not really a factor. Also, the Nikons have a better menu and are easier to modify to the user's preferences than the Sony cameras. The dynamic range of the Nikon was better although the newest Sonys have closed that gap. You can look at all the top systems and find that each has one or two things that they do better than anyone else. How important to your style of photography are those things? The best way to choose a system is not to ask others and rely solely on the input of other people since they likely will be biased toward the system they use. Get to a camera store and handle the equipment. Ask to put a couple of lenses on a body and see how it balances in your hand. Feel the grip -- does that fit your hand. If necessary, rent each of the cameras you have boiled your choices down to. Between two bodies and three or four lenses, you could be investing 10,000 dollars. Why would you risk that much money and be unhappy with your decision? In light of how much you may be spending on a system, a couple of hundred dollars to rent cameras is well worth the investment.

Canisdirus

Where have you been...
Sony pretty much owns the imaging world right now.
Exactly because they are very capable of thinking outside of the box.

Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA

Lets face it, Nikon is just better all around, and has a greater long term track record to its younger cousin Canon.

Nikon is the Cadillac whereas Canon is the Chevrolet. Quite simple. 🤣🤣🤣

therwol Loc: USA

Let the fun begin. Wait. It already has.

neillaubenthal

You know he's just a troll…and trolls gonna troll so best to just ignore those posts of his.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

Are there Tony and Chelsea haters?

I watch and read lots of reviews by various people, but I don't hate any of them. I tend to prefer some more than others because of the way they present the information, but I usually find something to appreciate in all reviews. A good deal of a review is opinion, but it has to be based in fact. A reviewer might make an error presenting what he thinks is a fact, but he'll usually follow-up with a correction.

User ID

Extra buttery, garlic powder, grated parmesan, ready for The Troll Show

User ID

If you really think Canon is Nikons younger cousin then you just dont *understand* the history of it. You probably can parrot a few dates all collected from what you had read somewhere from some "historian".
Chronology isnt the whole history.

BebuLamar

They are not related like Cadillac and Chevy. Also Canon made cameras way before Nikon made their first camera. Early Canon cameras used lenses made by Nikon.

Dbl00buk Loc: Orlando

Really??????

Desert Gecko Loc: desert southwest, USA

^^^ Troll. No sane human could really believe this.

(Buick, maybe, and possibly even Oldsmobile. But Cadillac? Pffft.)

Desert Gecko Loc: desert southwest, USA

Gotta admit, Tony made a persuasive argument. But he also once argued that we don't need circular polarizers, and that wasn't his only misguided idea that went to video -- which is why I unsubscribed a few years ago (guess I'm a Tony-hater, Jerry).

Tony failed to mention that around 8-10 years ago, Samsung released three Android cameras: two point & shoot and an APS-C mirrorless ILC. They were the Galaxy, Galaxy 2, and Galaxy NX.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

I follow Tony and Chelsea only when their words are repeated here.

In this case, whether they affect Nikon is pure speculation.

Indiana Loc: Huntington, Indiana

So, I viewed the video and I am just not buying the premise. I think the issue of product liability, misrepresentation, and deceptive practice, becomes an overriding issue with the idea that Sony is involved in a nefarious activity. Just my opinion