Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why the color difference?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 8, 2021 09:28:07   #
Photolady2014 Loc: Southwest Colorado
 
Thanks for all the responses. I was able to “fix” the color in LR since I shoot RAW. I am also learning on my R5 even if I’m not getting blinkies or the histogram is not pegged off the right, the whites can be blown. At a photo workshop I was taught to expose to the right, now I think I need to go back a little to the left!

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:01:58   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Photolady2014 wrote:
What is causing such a color difference between these 2 photos? They both had the focus box on the 2 bears together, and they were taken literally a second apart. 16:19:15 and 16:19:16 I did not have time to change any settings, but have included the info for each photo. I simply exported the RAW file as a JPEG for UHH, oh and straighten a tiny bit.
I really need to learn what is causing this and how I can keep it from happening in the future!
Canon R5 and RF 100-500 with 1.4 extender.
Thank you! Beth
What is causing such a color difference between th... (show quote)


AWB and AE…

Auto White Balance continuously tries to render a scene gray. So does auto exposure. If you want identical results from frame to frame, set both manually, in reference to a target made for that purpose.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:02:58   #
BushDog Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
I believe the previous comments are accurate. I’ll use my wording to give my two cents.

When you are not using full manual settings, meaning shutter, aperture and ISO, your camera will make adjustments in the automatic (non-manual) options to achieve a mid-tone (18%) gray exposure to the metered area (in this case, the metered area being the total image).

One of the images has more snow in it (hence, the “framing” already mentioned). The snow is VERY bright. So the camera is decreasing exposure more in that image to get to that mid tone gray. (SS 1/500 vs 1/320.)

Further confirmation or critique of my interpretation is welcomed.

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2021 10:03:35   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Photolady2014 wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. I was able to “fix” the color in LR since I shoot RAW. I am also learning on my R5 even if I’m not getting blinkies or the histogram is not pegged off the right, the whites can be blown. At a photo workshop I was taught to expose to the right, now I think I need to go back a little to the left!


At +0.7 EC in Evaluative Metering and Aperture Priority in RAW, your highlights should be easily recoverable from an EOS camera. Are you saying in LR you can't move the highlight slide to the left and recover details from this snow?

Experimenting with both your camera and your edit tools is a fundamental requirement of the ETTR approach. It is explicitly stated in all my ETTR posts.

ETTR in Practice

ETTR in Practice II

If you find LR will not recover those highlights, look at the same images in DPPv4 and set the highlight warnings indicator active. Burn a mental image of how / where those highlight warnings display. Use that mental memory going forward to recognize the same situation in the future aka experience so you're aware of when to drop the EC by minus 0.3 or more.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:09:35   #
User ID
 
Photolady2014 wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. I was able to “fix” the color in LR since I shoot RAW. I am also learning on my R5 even if I’m not getting blinkies or the histogram is not pegged off the right, the whites can be blown. At a photo workshop I was taught to expose to the right, now I think I need to go back a little to the left!

Yes the pendulum of the ETTR movement swung too far to the right.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:15:17   #
photoman43
 
These two pictures show why I do not use Auto WB. I set the WB needed for the scenes being taken to make sure my WB is uniform across a series of images. . If it needs to be changed I do it in post processing as I shoot in RAW.

I set color space to Adobe RGB to capture full range of colors. If I need an sRGB image I "make it" from the processed Adobe RGB at the time of Export.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:16:25   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
photoman43 wrote:
These two pictures show why I do not use Auto WB. I set the WB needed for the scenes being taken to make sure my WB is uniform across a series of images. . If it needs to be changed I do it in post processing as I shoot in RAW.

I set color space to Adobe RGB to capture full range of colors. If I need an sRGB image I "make it" from the processed Adobe RGB at the time of Export.


RAW files don't have a colorspace. Digital editors do, where ideally the ProPhotoRGB should be used, an option that doesn't even exist in the camera, because: RAW files don't have a colorspace.

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2021 10:29:56   #
Abo
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Note camera setting: WB mode - Auto Ambience. (aka Auto WB)

If you pull the RAW into an editor that shows you the 'as shot' K temp and tint, you'll likely see different values. The camera just decided a different value between frames.

BTW: if you shoot in RAW, using Adobe RGB as your color space is not relevant. It only accomplishes a different file name, giving you the leading underscore in the name. Your digital editor controls the colorspace during editing and / or the colorspace of the output file format.
Note camera setting: WB mode - Auto Ambience. (ak... (show quote)


I agree... you got this one right. And has a lot more credibility than a lot of your
inane metaphors

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:32:16   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Abo wrote:
I agree... you got this one right. And has a lot more credibility than a lot of your
inane metaphors

What's a metaphor?
... laughing.

I like most metas.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 10:32:52   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
Photolady2014 wrote:
What is causing such a color difference between these 2 photos? They both had the focus box on the 2 bears together, and they were taken literally a second apart. 16:19:15 and 16:19:16 I did not have time to change any settings, but have included the info for each photo. I simply exported the RAW file as a JPEG for UHH, oh and straighten a tiny bit.
I really need to learn what is causing this and how I can keep it from happening in the future!
Canon R5 and RF 100-500 with 1.4 extender.
Thank you! Beth
What is causing such a color difference between th... (show quote)


Two things that I noticed very quickly without downloading is the shutter speed is different with less exposure less color probably, and composition is a little bit different very slightly which means the camera moved slightly which could have affected the metering, I wouldn't think so with that slight change but it could be possible.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 11:42:27   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Photolady2014 wrote:
What is causing such a color difference between these 2 photos? They both had the focus box on the 2 bears together, and they were taken literally a second apart. 16:19:15 and 16:19:16 I did not have time to change any settings, but have included the info for each photo. I simply exported the RAW file as a JPEG for UHH, oh and straighten a tiny bit.
I really need to learn what is causing this and how I can keep it from happening in the future!
Canon R5 and RF 100-500 with 1.4 extender.
Thank you! Beth
What is causing such a color difference between th... (show quote)


What CHG_CANON wrote, but additionally note the AV & TV values for both are not the same f/11 & 1/500 vs f/11 & 1/320; the exposures were not the same. The center of each frame is different, the relative positions of the various elements in the two shots has changed slightly. Admittedly there is more difference than one might expect. But I have seen worse (more). Yup your metering system is fussy. As pointed out, shoot RAW. Unless you have a monitor and printer capable of AdobeRGB stay with sRGB, it is more universal.

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2021 11:58:31   #
Abo
 
Longshadow wrote:
What's a metaphor?
... laughing.

I like most metas.


A metaphor is a figure of speech that is used to make a comparison between two things that aren't alike but do have something in common.

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 12:01:11   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Abo wrote:
A metaphor is a figure of speech that is used to make a comparison between two things that aren't alike but do have something in common.


And what part of success being defined by the absence of a mirror would be considered a metaphor?

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 12:21:48   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Abo wrote:
A metaphor is a figure of speech that is used to make a comparison between two things that aren't alike but do have something in common.


..... meta phor
..meta for

What's a meta for?

(An American thing....? )

Reply
Jun 8, 2021 12:31:37   #
rcarol
 
Photolady2014 wrote:
So do you suggest sRGB?


If you are shooting RAW, color difference is irrelevant.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.