Reconvic wrote:
In the 4 weeks that I have been a member on UH I have learned much. That any affordable 600 zoom lens will perform as good as the other. That "lighting and getting close" is all important to a sharp image . That morning "golden hour back light " is all important followed by getting as close to your subject as you can.
(thanks imagemeister for driving that home)Upon joining here I immediately posted images and asked for critiques...thank you all. Recently I've posted images and have received unasked for criticism from inept pixel peepers who have never gotten even a good image.
Rule number: 1. If you take the time to criticize then take the time to show a better pertinent image or at
least have an example in your repertoire.
I have recently posted 2 images that received criticism that I was concerned about. I looked at the critic's topics and …….definitely didn't qualify them to criticize. I know that we all have different perspectives and criteria for what we consider to be: "outstanding". As a retired Recon Marine (special forces) and OCD I am striving for perfection (very redundant sentence) I will never achieve perfection in this hobby and that makes me happy. There is no rule number 2 just that if you can't back up your criticism then I would rather that you go on your way.
In the 4 weeks that I have been a member on UH I h... (
show quote)
Thank you for your service. I always like to help out fellow vets with their photography.
Critiquing is one of the most powerful and effective teaching and learning tools in photographic education. Requesting, receiving, offering and giving critiques is healthy and productive. Thing is, giving and taking critiques, like photography itself, are a craft and an art form in itself and it needs to be done in the right way and in the right spirit. Good, well-expressed critiques are constructive and helpful whereas harsh and thoughtless criticisms are counterproductive and discouraging.
There are no hard and fast rules but there are certain criteria that can apply to all kinds and styles of photography Technical elements like exposure, contrast, focus. detail, color saturation, tonal scale, etc., are good starting points. Then there are the aesthetics such as composition, viewer impact, use of light or lighting, and perspective. Of course, there are psychological elements such as mood, drama, emotional content, and how the image appeals to the viewer's perception.
So...personally, I am not a wildlife or bird photographer, but I can legitimately access an image based on the aforementioned aspects. I try to do this in a clinical manner and not reflect upon my personal tastes or styles. If I were an ornithologist or an editor with an Audubon Society publication, I might opine on the accuracy of the coloration of a bird's plumage, otherwise, I strictly go by the artistic impression and expression of the maker.
If there are technical or aesthetic issues, I will offer a remedial or preventative option for the maker to consider. I might offer a diagram, a formula or an illustration if I have one or, with permission, I might do a quick edit to illustrate my points.
Receiving a critique and making good use of it also requires some savvy. My basic rule of thumb is "take it from who it comes"! If you feel the critic knows what he or she is talking about, consider the suggestions and apply them to your own working methods. If you feel the critique is frivolous, without substance, or unkind, just skip it! Getting into an argument, aggravating yourself, getting into a bad back and forth is an unmitigated waste of time and energy. Save your energy for creative and scientific thinking about your photographic technique. If you receive a negative critique that is given in good faith and you think it has merit, question the critic and see what suggestions he or she has to contribute. As you learn the "ropes" you will soon be able to more easily differentiate between the "wheat and the chaff" or more frankly, between the good stuff and the B.S.!
Photography is my profession but it is also my hobby. If you want to enjoy your photography, get into experimenting with different renditions of your work- try different levels of color saturation- brash, hard, natural, subtle- muted and see what you like best. Artists who paint a draw can use oils, watercolors, inks, charcoal, and crayons- each with their own effect. You can do the same with your camera and post-processing. You can take a documentary approach or go with fantasies- you are the artist and the technician- it's all up to you!
Do not refrain from giving and taking critiques. Stay with the productive and constructive conversations and skip the trolls.
Didn't joint the USMC- Just the Army! Served with 101st Airborne Division- two tours in Country! Makes me appreciate peace!
Kindest regards, Ed