Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jackinkc
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 35 next>>
Dec 11, 2017 10:52:09   #
Chris T wrote:
What do your clients prefer? ... Do you give them the choice?


Shoot in color. You can always convert to B&W.
Go to
Nov 23, 2017 10:27:56   #
My rule of thumb is that if I go to a local brick and mortar for advice, I buy from that store. No exceptions.
Go to
Nov 23, 2017 10:24:35   #
kenArchi wrote:
I purchased a new Canon G3X plus various accessories for it.
Within a week testing I decided I did not like it. Returned all of it for credit and
purchased a new OM10 ll Olymplus with a 12-35f2.8 lens and a 100-300 lens. Plus extra accessories.
I still want to purchase a couple more lenses, etc.

My total cost for the G3X $1,042.00. B&H's credit to me is $504.00.

I guess that is how they like to treat their small customers.

Ken


I’ve never had a problem with any B&H OR Adorama return. Never!!!!
Go to
Nov 21, 2017 12:04:12   #
A little late.
Go to
Nov 21, 2017 12:01:23   #
Degusting!
Go to
Nov 21, 2017 11:57:53   #
I might KILL for pizza! Can you explain the taste difference between birch beer and root beer?
Go to
Nov 21, 2017 11:49:20   #
[quote=Soul Dr.]Here are some captures from my new camera, a Fujifilm X-T10. Just got it this past Fri. Been kind of busy this weekend, so not a lot of chance to use it.
These are some images I got with it around my house and neighborhood.
I really like this camera, as you use it mostly manually. All the controls are either knobs or dials so there is not much need to go to a menu to make changes to shutter speed, aperture or ISO. Got this one as a great deal, $350 new with free shipping and U. S. warranty for the body only.
Please view the downloads.

Nice, sharp, well composed shots! How did you get those photos of the antenna candelabra?
Go to
Nov 16, 2017 18:29:47   #
FRENCHY wrote:
I am a lucky guy ,

I was offer by my beautiful, smart, girlfriend a choice.

If I had to chose which camera would have had chosen, a 6000 or a 6500 Sony with two lenses ? the cameras I have now will stay with me . .

Help me on this one I know that a few have this type camera here

Thank you

Sorry I forgot to add , as usual, loll Whats the pros and cons about these two ?


Never mind the cameras; hold on to. That girlfriend!!!!!
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 15:00:06   #
wj cody wrote:
interesting, in re: the 2.8 with the Schneider lens. i've used both the planar and Schneider and have found both to be equally excellent. i stuck with the Schneider because most other users had the planars and i liked being "different"!!! so much for contrariness!


I bought my Rollei back in 1956 and I seem to remember that the only Zeiss lenses available then were East German Jena made. I'm not even sure there was a 2.8 Planar then but I do know that all 3.5 Tessars were from "The Worker's Paradise." I didn't want any East German camera gear back then because I was aware of the fact that the Soviets had removed so much Zeiss machinery to Kiev, and supplied essentially inferior raw materials and lubricants that the quality of products severely deteriorated. In the '60s, I did use old Exacta lenses on a reversal ring to make stunning macro shots with a Pentax LX.

Despite my reluctance to buy USSR Occupied German gear, I did later acquire a Contax D, with Biogon lens, and several Exakta cameras with Zeiss glass. My prejudices against East German products was bang on where the cameras were concerned but the lenses weren't bad at all. I wasn't surprised at the pathetic showing of the Contax D, but, I was seriously disappointed about the Exaktas. When I was a teen ager - back in the Late Stone Age - I deeply lusted for an Exakta. They were pretty expensive then; thank God I was never able to scrape together enough money to buy one. When faced with their reality instead of my dream, I might have had has to lay my head on the railroad track and let the 5:15 pacify my weary mind.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 14:34:35   #
GalaxyCat wrote:
I agree with you. I'm the original post person, the OP. This was just for fun.


My kind of OP.
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 20:25:49   #
GalaxyCat wrote:
I enjoyed reading these 6 pages. I'm the OP. Thanks to everyone who posted.


Me too!
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 12:46:03   #
Very nice. But it looks like if a few of those ladies prostrated themselves they might not be able to get up.
Go to
Nov 11, 2017 12:35:15   #
Mac wrote:
The 50mm is an outstanding lens. I have the f/1.8 version, you will enjoy using it. Have fun.


A "GRAY market" Nikon lens is the same as any other, it simply has not been imported through Nikon USA and will not be serviced by them. There really is no need to be chary about a gray market lens, though I might hesitate about a gray market camera.

Go to
Nov 11, 2017 12:26:19   #
GalaxyCat wrote:
This is the beauty of this website: put out a wild idea, and great people respond, and you learn a ton.

BTW: I have a car, just not in Boston. I don't need one here.


No place to park a car anyway.

BTW, I have been using a friend's Pentax 645Z and I am able to tell you all that it is a fine camera. Not only that, but many used lenses are available at very attractive prices.

0
Go to
Nov 10, 2017 14:11:53   #
joenardella wrote:
Anybody out there use Hasselblad cameras?


I use a 503CW. I prefer my old Rollei f/2.8D, with Schneider lens.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 35 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.