Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Phreedom
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 64 next>>
May 5, 2016 11:22:37   #
Duggy wrote:
Sorry for these know it all folk, they are so full of BS they are rude, and know that windows 10 SUCKS and always will. Look at the private polls, it is a Click of Gee I am so smart. for the reply what does this have to do with photography? That comment speaks for itself he dosent know where he is posting. Like Photography some are masters others , and most are not.Some people are good with os systems, and and sure want you to know they are, These folk aren't smart enough to know when something is forced on you, well DUH, more liberty was lost,but the simple minded are asleep.
Sorry for these know it all folk, they are so full... (show quote)


Sorry if this offends you but, with the exception of one writer questioning why a computer question was posted in a photography forum (which has since been moved to Chit Chat by Administration), everyone else has only been asking relevant questions to help Tangoking clarify exactly what the problem is so realistic help can be offered.
Go to
Apr 2, 2016 11:30:42   #
loubart wrote:
Can't use Picasa any more. Loved that program. Anyone know of a good free software organizer and editor like Picasa?


If you've deleted or need a copy of the Picasa program, you can still download the last version at FileHippo.com
Go to
Mar 19, 2016 09:28:00   #
ottopj wrote:
I'm curious as to why people have their location listed as "in hiding."

Would several of you who have you location listed as "in hiding" explain why you do so.

I can't imaging why you would do so. Are you in the Witness Protection Program?


Shhhhhh!
Go to
Jan 23, 2016 17:25:22   #
jerryc41 wrote:
You really do have to go through this quickly. Really! :D

http://www.diyphotography.net/what-would-it-look-like-if-men-did-boudoir/


Burt Reynolds did a much better job for Cosmopolitan in 1975... as did Arnold Schwarzenegger in 1977.
Go to
Jan 9, 2016 12:46:04   #
Checkmate wrote:
From the column of an Obama sycophant.
Read it and weep for a paranoid president


Do you understand what the word sycophant means?
How does this ancient, lone, negatively slanted column relate to that?

McFeatters’ column was written during and about the London G-20 meeting of 2009.
It has been a chain email and blogged repeatedly ever since.

http://www.factcheck.org/2011/07/the-traveling-president/

“When President Bush traveled to England in the fall of 2003 for a state visit, the Guardian reported that "Mr. Bush, his wife, Laura, and a 700-strong entourage worthy of a travelling medieval monarch, flew into Heathrow airport." And the Telegraph broke it down further, reporting that "Mr. Bush will be accompanied by a retinue consisting of 250 members of the Secret Service, 150 advisers from the National Security Department, 200 representatives of other government departments and 50 political aides." Also traveling with the president were "his personal chef, personal assistants, four cooks, medics and the presidential 15-strong sniffer dog team," according to the report.”

“In 1999, the General Accounting Office (now the Government Accountability Office) issued a report detailing the amount of planning and personnel support that went into executing President Bill Clinton's foreign trips to Africa, Chile and China in 1998.

“According to the GAO, nearly 500 people played a role in Clinton's nine-day trip across China, either traveling with the president, providing support to the delegation of travelers, or traveling to China earlier as a part of several advance teams that assisted in the planning of the president's trip. And nearly 600 were involved in Clinton's five-day trip to Chile that year, and nearly 1,300 were a part of Clinton's 11-day trip across Africa as well. And those totals did not include members of the Secret Service or non-federal officials and private citizens who later reimbursed the government for their travel costs, GAO said.”

“Also, Larry Speakes, press secretary to President Ronald Reagan, was quoted by John Hendren of the States News Service in 1992, saying: "I would say on some of the (Reagan administration's) European trips we had like 700 to 800 people involved, excluding the press corps."
Go to
Jan 7, 2016 11:05:24   #


Nasty?
The crucial detail that Windows 10 privacy critics are missing.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/revealed-the-crucial-detail-that-windows-10-privacy-critics-are-missing/
Go to
Jan 3, 2016 11:05:20   #
jerryc41 wrote:
It's one thing to have electronics that do can everything, but it's quite another to get them to do what you want.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-brenner/ultrasmart-phone-users-satire_b_8890858.html?utm_hp_ref=comedy&ir=Comedy


Jerry, you know that you should have pointed out quite clearly that this "incident" is only satire.
Go to
Dec 31, 2015 11:52:26   #
charles tabb wrote:
I want to ask a question.
It's probebly a stupid one....

How can I convert 7X to mm for instance or reverse?
I keep looking at cameras that have say a 300 mm lens
or say it has a 7X zoom lens.


To see what 7X really means (specific to each camera make and model)
and compare the camera's magnification power to a 300 mm lens (50 div. into 300 = 6X)
check the camera's detailed specs.

e.g.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Lens: Optical Zoom = 8X
Focal Length: 5.0 – 40.0 mm
35 mm Equivalent: 28 – 224 mm

Nikon COOLPIX P610

Lens: Optical Zoom = 60X
Focal Length: 4.3 – 258 mm
35 mm Equivalent: 24 – 1440 mm
Go to
Dec 20, 2015 09:32:43   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Link? (I am too lazy to look it up at the moment, no caffeine in my blood stream... :hunf: :hunf: :hunf: )


http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-5ds-sr/9
Go to
Dec 14, 2015 10:19:13   #
braindamage wrote:
I have aquired a brand new boxed AH-1 Huey Cobra Widowmaker by Franklin Mint. Includes a certificate of authenticity. It is hand painted in fantastic detail. 1-48 scale. I am trying to find a value for it but there is not another one anywhere online either here in the UK or America so I was wondering if anybody had any ideas of its worth. I can post some pics if anyone is interested. Many thanks


http://www.aikensairplanes.com/ah-1-g-cobra-helicopter-u-s-army-widow-maker-1-48-franklin-mint-fm-b11e297/
Go to
Nov 26, 2015 01:42:56   #
Steven Seward wrote:
I read the article and watched the entire video. While I don't believe in the Global Warming phenomenon to begin with, I had never heard about the levels of volcanic CO2 being such a factor before, so I was skeptical. The article written about the debate on video painted Ian Plimer in a very bad light and made him out to be some sort of scientific charlatan based on the debate with George Monbiot. When I watched the actual debate however, I found the opposite to be true. Plimer is actually quite informed and articulate, and Monbiot was not very knowledgeable and was extremely rude on top of this, and kept insulting Plimer with no justification. Every time they asked Plimer a question, he gave somewhat justifiably long and informed scientific answers, and invariably Monbiot would interrupt and claim that he was not answering the question when in fact he was. Monbiot was trying to get snap answers to very deep questions and was unwilling to wait for the instructive answers.
I read the article and watched the entire video. ... (show quote)


Sorry, we must have watched two different debates.

I saw Plimer giving “long and informed scientific answers” and avoid straight answers to simple questions about claims he made in his book on global warming/climate change. There were no “very deep questions” that required “instructive answers”. Both the moderator and Monbiot tried to keep Plimer on point but he resolutely resisted.

Several times when pressed by an exasperated Monbiot to please answer the question given, Plimer was quick to spout, “It is the height of bad manners to interrupt.” Then he blithely continued speaking off subject, as though giving a lecture.

Plimer also felt the need to denigrate writers not trained as scientists but who had the audacity to question him. One doesn’t need to be a trained conductor to know when an orchestra is not in tune.

Finally, when questioned about a quote in his book that, being out of context, gave the exact opposite meaning of the full quote; he smiled, ignored the question and lamented the difficulties of getting exact data from sounding balloons and satellites.
Go to
Nov 25, 2015 11:27:07   #
rolf wrote:
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From? Just How Large Is Your Footprint!

I love this... Hey! don't we in BC have a carbon tax???? so much for government honesty.

&#8203;Say what?&#8203;

Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide, and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopedia of Geology.

Born
12 February 1946 (age 68)

Residence
Australia

Nationality
Australian

Fields
Earth Science, Geology, Mining Engineering

Institutions
University of New England, University of Newcastle, University of Melbourne, University of Adelaide

Alma mater
University of New South Wales, Macquarie University

Thesis
The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)

Notable Awards
Eureka Prize (1995,2002), Centenary Medal (2003), Clarke Medal (2004)

Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?

PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The recent volcanic eruption in Iceland. Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.

Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it’s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.

I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad, nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50p light bulbs with £5 light bulbs ..... well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.

The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.

I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt. Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.

Yes, folks, Mt. Pinatubo was active for over one year - think about it!!!!

Of course, I shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.

And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.

Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.

Hey, isn’t it interesting how they don’t mention 'Global Warming' anymore, but just 'Climate Change' - you know why? It’s because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past few years and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.

And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping new tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer. It won’t stop any volcanoes from erupting, that’s for sure.

But, hey, relax......give the world a hug and have a nice day!"
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From? Ju... (show quote)


Please read and view:

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/dec/16/ian-plimer-versus-george-monbiot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEsygjXunTs

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2009/s2772906.htm
Go to
Nov 23, 2015 10:50:29   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I guess Briggs & Stratton is saving money any way it can. Although the generic manual that came with this Craftsman mower shows several possible locations for oil drain plugs, my new mower doesn't have one. All I could do was turn it upside down and drain about 6 oz of oil out. I'll have to get a pump for next year.


Your new mower doesn't have a drain plug... that you can find.

But the plug-less one in the article, coming out in the spring, was written up back in January of this year. So maybe yours is?


Go to
Nov 22, 2015 19:19:01   #
Ron M wrote:
Tried doing that
My Playbook doesn't have that option there


?? The original OS for the PlayBook did not have predictions and suggestions for the keyboard.
The updated version 2 added them as well as Auto-correct and spell-check.

Do you mean that the Keyboard icon showing in the left panel doesn't exist on your PlayBook?
It should be second from the bottom. Just stroke up on the screen to scroll to it.

Or did you mean the option to turn off "Automatically correct as I type" doesn't show.
It should show in the right panel when you touch on the Keyboard icon.
Go to
Nov 11, 2015 10:40:44   #
RichieC wrote:
I have a 9500 I bought in the 90's that was on 24/7 for nearly 10 years,... I keep it to run an expensive ($1700) UMAX scanner because UMAX refused to release OSX drivers- so it still runs an older Apple 9 operating system. I don't scan many chromes anymore- kinda need the space- been eyeing it. I have 2 G4's that have hard drives in them that work fine, and two G5's - my main computers. Note that they all network together and I can still go into my old 9500 and get files and or scans... hard to throw something away that runs as good as day one... Meanwhile, in the basement, I have a half dozen empty hulks of windows machines, with guts removed and piles of proprietary power supplies and ram, mother boards.. looks like the Jawa sandcrawler galley... they're slated for the recycling center... sadly the 20 year old 9500 may go with it.

Then I have to listen to windows advocates tell me how much better that platform is then "Apple junk"... But they'll probably vote for Hillary too using the same logic. (not to hijack the thread LOL)
I have a 9500 I bought in the 90's that was on 24/... (show quote)


Ignoring your last paragraph... we don't want this Topic to end up in the Attic...

Have you looked into SilverFast software? They produce drivers for many different scanners and printers (including UMAX) that allow them to continue to work on the latest PC and Mac systems.

Also, Umax offers an upgrade service and/or trade-in program for their older scanners.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 64 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.