Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: LEWHITE7747
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 71 next>>
May 26, 2023 07:32:28   #
profbowman wrote:
I am just curious. You said "untouched," and yet each of the five has a different pixel size. So, they were at least cropped. Right? --Richard


YES , I guess they were cropped heavily. Impossible to get that close to wildlife. Handheld. Spitting hairs?
Go to
May 26, 2023 07:29:07   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Looks like a Bird Section post.



As usual you missed the point. Still brain dead after all these years!

w
Go to
May 25, 2023 14:10:55   #
Have a Canon R7 with a 100-400 RF lens. $2000 set up. The following images are jpegs untouched out of the camera. Technology is remarkable.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Feb 17, 2023 12:15:28   #
The Anclote twins are growing fast


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Feb 12, 2023 10:44:34   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I got one like that a year or more ago. I increased the storage and memory for minimal cost.


Go to
Feb 12, 2023 10:42:37   #
lievka wrote:
Great shot

Where was this taken?


Bridge over the bay from St. Petersberg to Sarasota and south.
Go to
Feb 10, 2023 10:04:29   #
Skyway in Florida with the sun breaking the bay water.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 7, 2023 10:39:20   #
Anclote eagles that return every year to raise a brood of little ones. Incredible birds.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 6, 2023 11:33:34   #
I have an R7. Would anyone have any advice if it would improve my photos if I went from a EF 100-400 ll to the RF 100-500 lens.
Go to
Feb 6, 2023 11:19:58   #
Niklon wrote:
I am looking for a moderately priced (<$1,000) that will handle the Topaz offerings well. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Klon

Just bought an ACER laptop on AMAZON for$599. Full HD-IPS screen with 36 RAM. VERY FAST and can handle anything you can throw at it. (1TB ssd).
Go to
Feb 3, 2023 11:26:57   #
[quote=Sidwalkastronomy]In my Canon T7i with
SanDisk 64 GB sandisk new card will take
JPEG 5269.
Raw 1358
JPEG + Raw 1079.
So shooting both only decreases the # of shots by 279 so what is the big deal of shooting both for the best of both worlds?
I have my reasons and after a fishing trip I like to pass around hard photos not pass a phone around. I'm NOT going home and post processing.
Raw files and jpeg both saved and as my time and post skills improve I can always go back.[/quot
Try C-Raw
Go to
Feb 1, 2023 16:30:37   #
rlv567 wrote:
I have excerpted a few salient points from a very long Wikipedia article referenced in the “Why I shoot RAW” post, here, in order to simplify and make very clear the information about JPEG. The net of the whole article, simply put, is that JPEG is a means of reducing picture file size without degrading the resultant image too much – varying from imperceptible to the human eye, to unusable. It always selectively discards some of the original file’s information, that being done with regard to the perceptive capability of human vision. The resulting JPEG image, then, is not what actually was being “pictured”, but what the average human eye would “see”. This can be accomplished at varying (chosen) levels of degradation/picture quality.

“JPEG is a commonly used method of compression for digital images, particularly for those images produced by digital photography. The degree of compression can be adjusted, allowing a selectable tradeoff between storage size and image quality. JPEG typically achieves 10:1 compression with little perceptible loss in image quality.

JPEG uses a lossy form of compression based on the discrete cosine transform (DCT). This mathematical operation converts each frame/field of the video source from the spatial (2D) domain into the frequency domain (a.k.a. transform domain). A perceptual model based loosely on the human psychovisual system discards high-frequency information, i.e. sharp transitions in intensity, and color hue. In the transform domain, the process of reducing information is called quantization. In simpler terms, quantization is a method for optimally reducing a large number scale (with different occurrences of each number) into a smaller one, and the transform-domain is a convenient representation of the image because the high-frequency coefficients, which contribute less to the overall picture than other coefficients, are characteristically small-values with high compressibility. The quantized coefficients are then sequenced and losslessly packed into the output bitstream. Nearly all software implementations of JPEG permit user control over the compression ratio (as well as other optional parameters), allowing the user to trade off picture-quality for smaller file size.

The compression method is usually lossy, meaning that some original image information is lost and cannot be restored, possibly affecting image quality. There is an optional lossless mode defined in the JPEG standard. However, this mode is not widely supported in products.

Several alterations to a JPEG image can be performed losslessly (that is, without recompression and the associated quality loss) as long as the image size is a multiple of 1 MCU block (Minimum Coded Unit) (usually 16 pixels in both directions, for 4:2:0 chroma subsampling). Utilities that implement this include:
• IrfanView using "JPG Lossless Crop (PlugIn)" and "JPG Lossless Rotation (PlugIn)", which require installing the JPG_TRANSFORM plugin.
• FastStone Image Viewer using "Lossless Crop to File" and "JPEG Lossless Rotate".
• XnViewMP using "JPEG lossless transformations".
• ACDSee supports lossless rotation (but not lossless cropping) with its "Force lossless JPEG operations" option.

Image files that employ JPEG compression are commonly called "JPEG files", and are stored in variants of the JIF image format. Most image capture devices (such as digital cameras) that output JPEG are actually creating files in the Exif format, the format that the camera industry has standardized on for metadata interchange. On the other hand, since the Exif standard does not allow color profiles, most image editing software stores JPEG in JFIF format, and also includes the APP1 segment from the Exif file to include the metadata in an almost-compliant way; the JFIF standard is interpreted somewhat flexibly.

Many JPEG files embed an ICC color profile (color space). Commonly used color profiles include sRGB and Adobe RGB. Because these color spaces use a non-linear transformation, the dynamic range of an 8-bit JPEG file is about 11 stops.

If the image doesn't specify color profile information (untagged), the color space is assumed to be sRGB for the purposes of display on webpages.

Many of the options in the JPEG standard are not commonly used, and most image software uses the simpler JFIF format when creating a JPEG file, which among other things specifies the encoding method. Here is a brief description of one of the more common methods of encoding when applied to an input that has 24 bits per pixel (eight each of red, green, and blue). This particular option is a lossy data compression method.

First, the image should be converted from RGB (by default sRGB, but other color spaces are possible) into a different color space called Y′CBCR (or, informally, YCbCr). It has three components Y', CB and CR: the Y' component represents the brightness of a pixel, and the CB and CR components represent the chrominance (split into blue and red components).

A particular conversion to Y′CBCR is specified in the JFIF standard, and should be performed for the resulting JPEG file to have maximum compatibility.

Due to the densities of color and brightness-sensitive receptors in the human eye, humans can see considerably more fine detail in the brightness of an image (the Y' component) than in the hue and color saturation of an image (the Cb and Cr components). Using this knowledge, encoders can be designed to compress images more efficiently.

The transformation into the Y′CBCR color model enables the next usual step, which is to reduce the spatial resolution of the Cb and Cr components (called "downsampling" or "chroma subsampling").
The human eye is good at seeing small differences in brightness over a relatively large area, but not so good at distinguishing the exact strength of a high frequency brightness variation. This allows one to greatly reduce the amount of information in the high frequency components.

Since the quantization stage always results in a loss of information, JPEG standard is always a lossy compression codec. (Information is lost both in quantizing and rounding of the floating-point numbers.) Even if the quantization matrix is a matrix of ones, information will still be lost in the rounding step.

Those who use the World Wide Web may be familiar with the irregularities known as compression artifacts that appear in JPEG images, which may take the form of noise around contrasting edges (especially curves and corners), or "blocky" images.

Ten to one compression usually results in an image that cannot be distinguished by eye from the original. A compression ratio of 100:1 is usually possible, but will look distinctly artifacted compared to the original. The appropriate level of compression depends on the use to which the image will be put.

In the last few years, due to the growing use of stereoscopic images, much effort has been spent by the scientific community to develop algorithms for stereoscopic image compression.”

Loren – in Beautiful Baguio City
I have excerpted a few salient points from a very ... (show quote)


Jared Polin has started using JPEG's as they are now (with the new algorithms) as good as RAW files.
Go to
Jan 31, 2023 12:51:20   #
Anclote Eagles


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Jan 29, 2023 10:47:55   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I got a paper bill from Spectrum, which is odd. The bill has risen to over $203. I'm calling tomorrow to cancel the TV portion. I'm going to try YouTube TV. I wonder how long it will take me to cancel tomorrow. If they're anything like XM Radio, I'll have to make lunch. : )

They keep raising and raising the price, with no increase in service.


They are trying to make as much money as possible before they become obsolete.
Go to
Jan 29, 2023 10:39:11   #
Hoku1 wrote:
Aloha UHHs,

I was about to press the purchase button for the Canon R5. But, I got cold feet after reading some of the reviews they were experiencing on Canon's website. Rating for this camera looks like a C+. For those who owns the R5, are you currently having or had issues with the camera itself? Is there a concern that I should be aware of?
This purchase would have been my last upgrade from my Mark 5DII, and I'd be taking it on my upcoming international travel.

My second choice might be the R7.

Mahalo
Aloha UHHs, br br I was about to press the purcha... (show quote)


I have just bought the R7. The focusing system will blow you away. $1500 The best money I ever spent for photo equipment.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 71 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.