Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: haren
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
Aug 26, 2022 21:47:57   #
DRam11 wrote:
She is using her iPad camera for what it was designed. It wasn’t designed to be an all-around camera for any kind of shot. Example, I saw a beautiful sunset a few days ago and all I had was my Samsung S 21. The several pictures I took were terrible. No amount of postprocessing would make them look good. On the other hand, I have some very nice 11 x 14 prints made from a Samsung S5. But those were landscapes with good lighting.


Interesting...thank you for your input
Go to
Aug 26, 2022 09:58:30   #
JD750 wrote:
A few years ago a photographer friend went to Italy. He set up his Canon DSLR on a tripo for a shot of gargoyles, waited for the light. Just when he snapped the shutter his wife stuck her iPad into the frame and took a pic. He told me “the worst part is her pic is better”.

Technology is changing and enabling people to take good quality images with less effort and time. Some people embrace it. Some deny it. But technology marches on regardless of what they think.


I agree and it might be fun to try an Ipad.
Go to
Aug 25, 2022 08:53:05   #
rmorrison1116 wrote:
You can do it, with pretty much any camera if you know how. Photography with a smart phone or any phone with a digital camera, is very similar to photography with an ipad or other similar device, just not as obnoxious.


thanks for your input
Go to
Aug 25, 2022 08:49:59   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Isn't the result of effort its own reward? Every photography hobbyist has the choice to do as much or little - in every step - as they want. The joy of the process!

I know two people who spent six months creating incredibly gorgeous quilts. I don't understand why they didn't just buy them at Target?


I am guilty of that too.
Go to
Aug 25, 2022 08:48:47   #
ronichas wrote:
I believe this is why the long time professional photographers are doing photo tours. They can't sell as many images as they have in the past.
Now with phones, Ipad's everyone is a photographer!!!


I love this cartoon!
Go to
Aug 24, 2022 18:02:38   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
As noted above, the technology of the iPad is biased toward a sharp depth of field. You might want to consider other attributes too. When zoomed to the 1:1 pixel level, are the details just as sharp and detailed as a successful (good) DSLR result? This includes both the 1:1 details on your monitor and both image files printed to the same physical dimensions. Does the iPad capture in RAW? Is the comparison for all photography or just landscapes? How does the iPad perform in low(er) light? Are there flaws in the shooting technique of the DSLR user that lowers the output quality?
As noted above, the technology of the iPad is bias... (show quote)


food for thought
Go to
Aug 24, 2022 17:34:46   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
She's a better photographer than the person with the DSLR?


I am not saying I can't do it. I guess I am a little jealous of the little effort she put into it. Maybe smartphones are the same. I do not own either.
Go to
Aug 24, 2022 17:16:22   #
I have a daughter that whips out the Ipad and takes great landscape photos. Everything front to back is in focus and clear as a bell just compose and shoot. What gives?
Go to
Jul 20, 2022 11:39:14   #
knutte wrote:
Pondering that myself as I'm heading home to Sweden in 2 months, first trip in 3 years. But like others said, European airlines can be more restrictive, last time I went I had a Think Tank bag that was fairly small and think I'll just bring a body and 2 lenses.


Me too, paring down as I have to carry the pack myself. thanks
Go to
Jul 19, 2022 22:05:06   #
timcc wrote:
Have a great trip to Norway! We were there last month (Bergen, Oslo, and a small-ship cruise through the fjords). It is a very photogenic country -- I've posted some pics on https://timcrossphotos.shutterfly.com/pictures/5. Be prepared for rain and gray weather, though, as well as some beautiful days. And, yes, my camera pack counted as a personal item on the United flight. Good luck!


Love your photos of Norway thanks
Go to
Jul 19, 2022 17:52:35   #
lyndacast wrote:
When I travel, I try to take only a mirrorless camera with 2 lenses. I have a great carry on bag that fits my camera and lenses in a smaller bag on one side, my toiletries, iPad (which I take instead of computer) a change of clothes, etc.


Thanks, I am taking the fugi XT3 with an 18 /55 lens. I am trying to decide if I should take the 55 to 200 lens ( a bit heavy) with a little further reach than just 55mm.
Go to
Jul 19, 2022 15:02:40   #
AnotherBob wrote:
Not overseas, but I used the Airport Elements bag for a trip to Hudson Bay, Canada, in a series of ever smaller planes. It was perfect for my needs, and fit within the space limitations of the often picky Air Canada and others. I also found that, although the airlines are strict in enforcing weight limits for your carry-on luggage, not so for you. I stuffed two lenses in my jacket pockets and rearranged things once on the plane. Of course, always check with your airline for current restrictions.
Not overseas, but I used the Airport Elements bag ... (show quote)


Quick thinking...thanks I'll keep that in mind
Go to
Jul 19, 2022 14:59:45   #
HallwoedHill wrote:
Yes. It has been to Ireland (2x), Switzerland, Italy, Greece, Turkey and Mexico as my personal item with no problem whatsoever. Occasionally it will have to be checked at the gate on regional flights, but other than that no issues.


Sounds like a super camera
Go to
Jul 18, 2022 13:43:09   #
haren wrote:
You must have a small camera and bag. Maybe I'll have to pare down. I am traveling alone.
Go to
Jul 18, 2022 13:30:24   #
You must have a small camera and bag. Maybe I'll have to pare down. I am traveling alone.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.