Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: The Woodpecker
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jun 14, 2021 16:16:48   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I'll take a firm stand: there will be no new DSLRs from Nikon nor Canon. Neither company has any scheduled in 2021. A situation that has not existed since 2000.

The Age of the DSLR is over. The Time of the MILC has come.

Let history prove me wrong.


Though I get the technology and benefit of removing the step of the mirror, when I decided to go for a brand/system change 4 years ago, I went with Pentax (so happy!). One of the things that influenced my decision was that it is an SLR with a 100% viewfinder - a big bright one. With mirrorless, you are seeing the sensor's interpretation of the scene on a mini screen like a video camera. You are not seeing the actual scene with your eye.

Your point is well taken. I was the general manager of a McIntosh (hifi) dealer in the 70's and 80's. I frequently visited the Gen-Xer's across the street who owned the best record store in town. I was there when they got the first shipment of the only 50 titles released on CD. We all stood around playing them and looking at them, and all of us were of the mind, "This will never fly!" The rest is history.
Go to
Apr 28, 2021 16:08:46   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
What is the purpose of the lens? A short focal length like 60mm is fine for static subjects like jewelry and coins. It might be a bit problematic for anything live that might move away in fright for you needing to be so near the subject. For full frame and all sorts of subjects, maybe consider a longer lens in the 100mm or longer range, if needed.


I am not sure about that. I regularly photographs insects, insects, frogs, snakes, and even Bees, with a macro lens. i typically use a 90mm or 150mm, but I have been able to minimum focal distance - 8-12 inches depending on the lens.
I am considering lately buying an Irix 150 Dragonfly.
Does anyone have any experience with these lenses?
Go to
Mar 28, 2021 14:20:43   #
John N wrote:
Zooms are jack of all trades, master of none lenses. But very useful though.


Also, if you carry a big zoom, the lens barrel rides out on your hip (a hair pony tie around the zoom ring and looped to the tripod mount works).
Go to
Mar 28, 2021 14:17:15   #
SteveR wrote:
have all been shot with prime lenses. There are a few photographers that I know who take great photos who I wish shot with primes.


Awesome. I have never liked zooms (35mm era), though useful in some situations. Since making the catastrophic jump from film to digital (with a decade hiatus), I have been very disappointed with the big camera manufacturers for not producing more large prime lenses. I suppose, mostly, because the Zoom lens tech has improved so much, but still not a prime. I finally went with Pentax on the digital side, and I am very pleased the 300mm f/4 prime (wildlife). Finding a 400mm f/2.8 is becoming more and more problematic, and even the wide angle lens selection with most companies is becoming more zoom than prime.
What type of photography are you doing?
Woodpecker
Go to
Oct 26, 2020 13:06:05   #
SABugl123 wrote:
I did my first wedding for free. Spend time editing the photos & sent them to the couple. Now they want me to unedited them & send them to them. Do I go back & unedit them, & resend them? I am kind of socked & somewhat offended. What do I do???


Don't do it! I would never send anyone unedited or RAW format images.
1. Not everyone is photogenic. When taking pictures of people I often must edit things like pimples, blemishes, poor makeup, etc. People only like to see themselves in the best possible way.

Several years ago I photographed Leon Russell performing at a bar in Ormond Beach. Because I knew the owner, I was on the stage at the other end of the piano, less than eight feet away from Russell. I photographed him repeatedly with a flash. This was only a few months before his death and he looked really bad - jaundiced and sagging with a road map of broken capillaries all over his face. Why would anyone release a photo like that? One of the secondary staff members asked me to send him unedited images and I refused. The only images I released were those that I edited, including correcting the color of the jaundiced cast and removing the broken capillaries and smoothing his skin.
I think it is extremely bad form to release an image of someone looking their worst.
Go to
May 18, 2020 18:39:47   #
Architect1776 wrote:
The difference is that this is not an economic base slow down but a forced slow down of a hyper strong economy. Once the shut down is removed things will pick-up back to full steam and if you sold your stuff at a loss you would be screwing yourself having to then re-buy your equipment.
Unless you were ready to upgrade to something newer anyway and are using this as an opportunity to switch over.


Hyper Strong Economy!? You must be smoking Crack. We have not had anything resembling that since 1983.
Go to
Apr 22, 2020 18:21:35   #
What is wrong with you people? Obviously, you grew up in a classless, disadvantaged environment.
Go to
Apr 22, 2020 16:44:04   #
What are you talking about? I have never done weddings
Go to
Apr 22, 2020 16:22:55   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
You mean everyone holding up their phones blocking the view of the guy with the camera?


I have not had that experience yet - thankfully, but I have noticed an enormous disrespect from venues and event operators. I started out photographing golf tournaments and doing some commissioned insurance work as a teenager. I was always warmly welcomed - in the ways of polite society - into private country clubs and tournament venues.
Now, when trying to get on with a tournament or any other event, I am met with the most obnoxious, and disrespectful assholes. What has happened to everyone? I wondered (with golf) if it was only my Legacy Private Club affiliation that swept me into those events in the past, but there seems to be an epidemic of assholishness and disrespect everywhere. I just don't get it.
Go to
Apr 6, 2020 15:04:11   #
gmsatty wrote:
I won't comment on the dry ice, except that it can burn you, but I will on Omaha steaks. They are really not the best quality and you can do a lot better, even going to a local butcher. Their hype is incredible, but I know meat and they are not the best as well as being overpriced. Not a criticism, just a friendly comment.


It continues to astonish me that people buy Omaha Steaks. Did they fail Math in school? Plus - Hellooooo!! it is FROZEN!! Freezing ruins meat. I can hardly wait to pay $25/lb. for frozen meat. I guess these people missed chemistry class, too. Blood cells breakdown during thawing, ruining the taste, texture, and whatever quality the meat once was.
Go to
Mar 31, 2020 17:54:32   #
Yes!
Recently, I have been doing some restoration work on some photos for my cousins. Their mother died when we were all kids. Going through all the snapshots, I could not find any that included their mother. It was then I realized it was their Mother who took all the pictures. And so, when viewing the images you are seeing them through her eyes. This brings an indescribably heartfelt quality to the photos.
Go to
Mar 31, 2020 17:17:48   #
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
A truer statement has never been uttered. Perception varies as much as anything. One man's reality can be anothers? Question on purpose. A person can be brainwashed so that what you and I see as a tree becomes a monster to the brainwashed. The mind is a very powerful and yet delicate organ if you can actually call it that.



I think y'all are on the wrong philosophical track with this. A photograph captures a specific moment in time and space. We use the word, "capture," because that moment can never be had, seen, or experienced again. It is gone in the same moment we capture it. It is unique and not reproducible. Taken further, imagine a potter throwing a bowl. Now you have a series of moments that are calculated by an individual into the form of a clay vessel. It is bisqued, then glazed, and fired. Though a talented production level potter (I traveled the art circuit and only met two like this in my life) can come very close to throwing and glazing nearly identical vessels, once it is fired in a catenary arch kiln - you know , with real fire, it goes through a series of molecular interactions that can never be reproduced - each moment in the kiln has a different character and produces a different result - the Magic of the Kiln. This then imbues the vessel with a uniqueness and quality that make the vessel invaluable. Regarded in this perspective, the real value of the bowl is inestimable; the character of the bowl can never be re-captured.
And so with a photograph - a single moment that can never be captured again - it also is invaluable.
Go to
Mar 30, 2020 18:26:22   #
fuminous wrote:
How many of us today would be enthusiastic photographers 100 years ago?

I ask because of reading, "Photographic Amusements, Including A Description of a Number of Novel Effects Obtainable with the Camera" by- Walter E. Woodbury, - Revised and Enlarged by Frank R. Fraprie-Ninth Edition- 1922  Copyright- 1896... and admit to a good bit of smugness when discussed is the hilarity of having the photographer- or others- appear to be shaking hands with themselves or flouting the laws of time and space. But, I also must allow a good bit of respect for these early shutterbugs given the difficulty of doing such things IN CAMERA!. Even a simple silhouette image becomes a major undertaking when background, reflectors- position of the window... lots of things must be considered...

There are fun things, too: "Photo in a Bottle" - that is, photographic emulsion being sloshed about to coat the interior of a bottle, letting it dry and taping a negative to the bottle's exterior then, heading into sunshine with a finger up the bottle's orifice so it can be turned for an even exposure. Simply pour developer, stop and fixer into the bottle for processing. And, "electric photographs" - various metal objects (coins a favorite) placed on a dry plate and passing a current "exposes" the silver halides without visible light..

One novelty offered is having an image of your favorite scenic, or perhaps Uncle Fred, that reveals itself only when its temperature reaches whatever temperature hog fat liquifies and turns transparent. I suppose, if the image was a bit risqué', it would be a hoot in some Wisconsin ice fishing shack. Regardless, instruction for making this delightful, "Disappearing Photograph" is provided and the materials list includes: white wax, hog lard, a strip of "gold beater's skin" and strong glue. Not mentioned is the point at which lard turns rancid... No doubt this novelty is best suited for cooler regions.

How 'bout "Post Mortem" photographs... First, have a negative of the departed one; either provided by the family or, taken yourself.  Then, mix together various amounts of, "... bichromate of ammonia, albumen, grape sugar, bichromate of potash, honey..." plus other ingredients which combined and gently heated over a spirit lamp, and, while still warm, is applied evenly to a glass plate, which, when dry, is ready to be exposed.  Place the glass plate and afore mentioned negative onto a printing frame and expose to the sun for two to five minutes.  Next, remove the negative and place the exposed plate in a dark, damp place to absorb moisture.   When the plate becomes tacky, evenly dust over it the cremated remains of the departed one (the guy in the negative)... which will, "  ... adhere to the parts unexposed to light, and a portrait is obtained composed entirely of the person it represents, or rather what is left of him." But wait! There's more!! "When fully developed the excess of powder is dusted off and the film coated with collodion.  It is then well washed to remove the bichromate salt.  The film can, if desired, be detached and transferred to ivory, wood, or any other support."  
For me... all I can imagine is something along the line of Elvis on black velvet...

So, again: Would you be a photographer 100 years ago?
How many of us today would be enthusiastic photogr... (show quote)


Switching from film to digital is quite a thing.
I attended the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art. Trained in anatomy and figure work. At the time I was also interned to a Large Format commercial photographer. I would go into factories with this man, and in stocking feet on an enormous white seamless backdrop would guide boilers and giant ship's equipment into position from a gantry crane. It took every bit of an hour just to set up one exposure. So yes, I would have been a photographer. I loved it! The man I interned under played golf with George Eastman - that's right! We were shooting 8x10 E6 transparencies in 1977. As well as other experimental films, papers, etc. long before they were available to not only the public,but other professional photographers.
I am now a wildlife photographer. I decided to make the digital conversion - when digital still sucked - about ten years ago. Digital has only recently become as good as film, and sometimes I think, it still sucks. About two years ago, I almost went back to film, and was making plans for a darkroom in my home (love cibachrome). Finally after exhaustive research (I had a really good mentor/teacher for Photoshop) and three cameras, I made a system brand change and went to Pentax. Now, I could not be more pleased.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 15:45:59   #
Brian S. wrote:
Hi All,

I have a large collection of Nikon lenses, Point-n-Shoot Cameras and Camera bodies plus an unbelievable amount of other accessories, High-End filters and more. They came from a good friend that passed about a year ago. I have been able to sell some of it but my current audience has purchased all they seem to want.

This is not a commitment but I wanted some feedback about this company regarding reliability and paying a fair/reasonable price.

Roberts Camera / UsedPhotoPro
1-800-726-5544
info@usedphotopro.com
220 E St Clair Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204

Thank you for your help.

As soon as the opportunity presents itself I plan to advertise the major items to the UHH.

Brian Stone
Hi All, br br I have a large collection of Nikon ... (show quote)



When I am looking for anything, I check them first. I have done business with Roberts Camera since the late Seventies, and they are excellent!
Go to
Mar 19, 2020 15:45:26   #
Do you think Americans or Western Europeans would be offended were they referred to as "Occidentals?"
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.