Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Travler
Jul 25, 2022 10:18:08   #
Please explain how IQ intersects with on-screen viewing. I view and send my images for viewing on electronic screens (smart phones, tablets and computers). Is IQ as much (or more) a function of the viewing screen than of the camera/lens?
Thanks
Go to
May 28, 2021 13:01:44   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Although you asked about metering, I find the shutterspeed is more important for older prop planes. To achieve a blur for prop planes, you should be in the 1/200sec to 1/320sec range on the shutter. Ideally, you'll be in manual to control both the shutter and aperture so you have wing-tip to wing-tip depth of field. The acrobatic planes can be in the 1/400sec range.

I don't trust any of the partial meter readings and whether they will actual meter what is relevant for a moving subject. Did I really have a 5% portion of the frame exactly on the relevant portion of a fast moving subject? Rather, Sony's "Multi" will meter the entire frame and you can predict how it will respond to a blue (or cloudy) sky. If you use Shutter or Aperture priority modes, use a +1 EC to tell the camera to brighten the frame so you don't end up with a noisey underexposed sky. In manual, adjust the ISO to position the meter at +1 over the 0-mark.

For the actual day, take some test shots even before the planes are in the air. If you have some white clouds where the planes will fly, use them to confirm if you can push the exposure more to the right. If the clouds are blinking in the test images, you have the ISO too high. Use f/8 to f/11 for the depth of field and to give some options of the ISO at or above ISO-100. If the clouds in your test image are not blinking with the meter at +1, test where they start blinking as you push the exposure to the right. You may be at +1.3 to +1.7 to the right of the 0-mark, depending on the sky and time of day.

The image below is 1/250 sec (for the blur), f/10 and ISO-125 at an extended 600mm. The image was brighter coming out of the camera than the edited result. The whites were white without being over exposed. On a similar day to the example below, if you fixed your shutter at 1/250 in shutter priority and the ISO at ISO-100 with the EC at / around +1, the camera will handle the aperture easily between f/8 and f/11. You just have to pan, focus and shoot.

Final tip, capture the planes at their closest point while still coming toward the camera and passing. After they've passed will an easier shot, but less interesting. It can take all day (or multiple days) to get your panning technique so that you smoothly track the moving subjects and release the shutter in 3- to 5-frame bursts. Each plane will likely make several passes, practice and prepare with each pass, and hopefully at least 1 excellent keeper comes from every plane.

Warbirds over Oshkosh by Paul Sager, on Flickr
Although you asked about metering, I find the shut... (show quote)

Paul, great picture.
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 05:56:48   #
Good, practical advice.
Go to
Dec 12, 2019 07:22:29   #
The last quote from Jackson Brown is: "Don't think it WON'T happen just because it hasn't happened yet"
Go to
Feb 9, 2019 10:51:47   #
At least it's a "strong" password.
Go to
Feb 3, 2019 10:50:32   #
Second that emotion.
Go to
Aug 25, 2018 11:48:34   #
Is there a "how to" book for the PP application: PAINT.NET (hard copy or download)? Comments regarding feature set and learning curve are welcome.
Go to
Jul 14, 2018 16:39:04   #
Thanks for the detailed information. So far, the lack of a definitive vote in favor of the ZS 100 has me slowing down a bit. I'll keep listening.
Go to
Jul 14, 2018 11:45:44   #
GAS can be found in so many areas (e. g. TV's, Hi FI, cars, smart phones, model trains!). Sometimes it's the wrong thing to do, sometimes it's ok (the trick is separating the one from the other).
Go to
Jul 14, 2018 10:45:49   #
I have a Sony HX20V and am considering upgrading to a camera with a 1" sensor (i. e., a Lumix ZS100). My goal is sharper, better looking pictures, but the lens on the ZS has been criticized as "soft". Most of my viewing is on computer/tablet screens and I don't crop radically. The HX images appear reasonably sharp (to me at least). Will the images on the ZS be noticeably sharper, clearer, better when viewed?
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.