Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: RickTaylor
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
Oct 11, 2020 07:59:41   #
Fran I think you have made an excellent decision. The D500 is not a D5 however for sports and action it is a reasonable alternative considering cost. I have both the D850 as well as the Z7. I grab the Z7 now 99% of the time. The D850 while being an excellent camera is now just used for studio work which is rare for me. I considered selling it however it was not worth the financial loss I would sustain. The Z 7 I have been extremely happy with and hav owned since it was first available. The native lenses that are available are incredibly sharp 24-70 2.8 for example. Your previous lenses however will work well with the FTZ adapter. You won’t be disappointed with you choice as the photos are incredibly sharp. You may want to look at the Z7 II and do a cost performance analysis however.
Go to
Oct 11, 2020 07:44:54   #
Ben's nana wrote:
This was my original ask on camera consolidation:

"I've decided I have too much stuff. I have a nikon D750, which has been my primary camera. My kids were serious athletes, so I have a D500 that I've used for sports and for macro. I still do some sports, but not nearly as much. I'm thinking of selling the 2 and just getting a D850. I've read nothing but good things about the D850. So here's my question, especially for those of you who have used the D850...would the upgrade be worthwhile?"

So, I gave the D850 a try. I'm not that big a person, and I found the 850 just too big for my hands. I also tried out the z7 mirrorless. I liked the smaller size and it is full frame. I haven't taken the plunge yet, but i think I'm going to keep the D500, sell my D750, and get a Z7 with the Ftz adapter. I know that's not really a consolidation, but mirrorless seams seams to be the direction cameras are moving toward. There would be no reason to have all three (even though I'm a firm believer in GAS). So that's where I've settled.
Fran
This was my original ask on camera consolidation: ... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 12, 2020 06:41:59   #
Keen wrote:
Always blame DarnOld Trumputin.....The Orange P*ssyGrabber.


Wtf does that statement have to do with anything? Dickhead
Go to
Jan 12, 2020 06:34:46   #
mcmama wrote:
I don’t know if it’s a case of gas, seeing the writing on the wall, or both. I’m seriously looking into getting a Z6. I’ll keep my D750, at least for now, for sports shooting.

I want to know if anyone has gone from a D750 to a Z6, and if so what your thoughts are on the switch. I have the $, so that is not a factor. I will be selling my D7200 equipment, though, as it will only collect dust with the addition of the Z6.

Thanks for your comments,
Dana

You will probably use the Z6 for sports shooting as well. The 750 while somewhat adequate for sports in my opinion the Z6 will out preform it
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:08:20   #
bobishkan wrote:
According to Tony Northrup's very recent You Tube, "Nikon is Dying", Nikon is going out of business unless they change things quickly. What do you think?


We will see the melting of the polar ice cap first. Northrop has his own agenda-himself.
Go to
Oct 30, 2019 18:03:46   #
wetreed wrote:
The D500 is very similar to the D5 only it’s a crop sensor camera and the D5 is full frame.


I agree the D 500 is fine camera. To say that is similar to the D5 is somewhat of an overstatement. Yes they will both take a picture. However if you shoot a lot of action photography the D5 blows it away. I know from experience as I have both of these bodies. If you ever have the opportunity to shoot the D5 you will understand what I am saying. Specifically in low light the fast focus and noise is significantly better than the D500
Go to
Sep 29, 2019 08:28:51   #
Camera
Go to
Sep 23, 2019 20:23:53   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I still have a Craftsman socket set from about 1961. Snap-On might make good tools, but I've never had a Craftsman tool break. There is such a thing as over-paying in the hope of getting better quality. One of my favorite expressions is, "You get what you pay for." Translation: "You leave the store with what you bought." Totally meaningless.


For the average home owner or home mechanic craftsman tools are fine. They will no hold up to everyday use in a shop environment
Go to
Sep 23, 2019 20:21:34   #
chrissybabe wrote:
You might not ask an auto mechanic what tools he uses but you will find am's with a whole box full of Snap-On tools and buy him a few drinks and he will tell you about the time he picked up an old Snap-On from 1988 that is still working great. I bet anything you like that he secretly thinks it makes him a better mechanic because he has the best tools.


There is a huge difference between Snapon quality and any other wrench or socket period
Go to
Sep 21, 2019 08:38:15   #
I believe this lens is one of the best values Nikon has. I cannot believe the quality and performance for the price paid. I would’ve had no problem paying more for this piece of glass. I use on my D5 as well as D850 with no issues for over 3 years. It is that good.
Go to
Jun 15, 2019 06:59:03   #
willy6419 wrote:
Thinking a versatile walk around

Good reviews

Little slow and wide range so can’t be as sharp as some

Any input pro. Con


I must have gotten lucky and bought the only good copy of this lens in the world as shown by all the negative reviews. While this lens is not as sharp as an expensive 70 to 200 Nikon for the money it truly is a decent lens. I have three full frame bodies a D3 a D850 a D5 as well as a Z7. I primarily leave it attached to my older D3 however I have used it on the other bodies with decent results. In my opinion if you want to cover all your bases and don’t need a fast piece of glass this lens will come in very handy as a decent walk around lens. Just understand it’s limitations. I have over a dozen framed prints hanging in my home and office ranging from birds to motocross that were taken with this lens.
Go to
Jun 9, 2019 00:21:13   #
d3200prime wrote:
Please learn how to use the forum options properly.


Didn’t realize you were the forum police. Excuse the shit out of me for responding to the wrong reply. Maybe when I grow up I will be perfect like you.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 19:12:30   #
d3200prime wrote:
I don't have an opinion on either camera but I will say you are one brave soul to take on a trip with your six grown kids and believe you won't slow them down with your prolific propensity to photograph. I hope all goes well but I see trouble in paradise ahead. Will look forward to viewing your shots when you get back. BTW: where ya going?


Keep your NIKON’s. You already have good equipment. With the crew you are traveling with spend the money on the best scotch you can find.
Go to
May 22, 2019 15:32:33   #
Country Boy wrote:
Thanks for the response Phil, I have always planned to keep the D7100 myself. I was only thinking of the Z6 until they came out with the AF Eye Detection and that was enough to make me serious. I don't want to go through the recall process so I will likely stay with what I have and re-think it after they are producing factory correct versions. I have a granddaughter taking photography in high school so it may become a loaner or trainer for her when she comes to visit.


If you buy from a local vendor you can see if the camera has a recall by entering the serial number on Nikons website. My local vendor has them in stock and they wont sell if they are recalled. The owner of my local store is a friend and he confirmed
Go to
May 22, 2019 12:11:23   #
Country Boy wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D7100 and to be honest it meets my needs. I have been into photography since 1967 and now retired and my needs have been greatly reduced. Mostly my photos are of people in church/business presentations or basic activity. I normally have 5 to 10 photos published with newspaper articles each year mostly getting awards or just family type shots. Last year I did a 2 DVD package of historical events shooting documents and stills (2,045 photos) for a scholarship fund. I have been thinking of purchasing a new camera mostly for faster focus, better low light performance and better detail although I am not displeased with my D7100. I am between two camera choices now but have a third coming.

I have not used a full frame camera and can't judge what detail improvements I would receive but the Nikon Z6 on sale now has the AF Eye detection software which would be a great tool. I called Nikon and asked if I purchased the Z6 from them could they send one currently out of production that would not be subject to the recall and was told they cannot, you get what you get. On the other hand, the D500 although not full frame could use all the lens I have (5 that covers my needs) and covers the faster focus and low light requirement.

I would like to know what experienced photographers would choose. The Z6 is now on sale for $2,399.95 with the 24-70 mm lens (4.?) and a free FTZ adaptor which is a savings of $450.00. Currently the D500 body only is $1,499.95 and with the 16-70 mm f2.8 4E ED VR lens which I like it goes for $2,099.95 which is a retail savings of $670.00. While I like the savings, I don't want that to drive my decision.

Would you select one of these or hold off to see what the new D760 due out in the fall has to offer or see which other Nikon cameras will get the AF Eye detection upgrade? Thanks for any input.
I currently have a Nikon D7100 and to be honest it... (show quote)


I have a Z7. Absolutely love the camera and the AF eye detection is great. I use it more than my D850.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.