imagemeister wrote:
How big of prints were you making ??
Didn't print any of the test images. Just looked at them on my monitor.
timbuktutraveler wrote:
Thanks for this info.
I wondered, have you used Clear Image Zoom with the RX100 VII
and if so how was the Image Quality?
Larry
I have done pretty thorough testing with my RX100 VII to see if using its CIZ and cropping down or just cropping down a photo without using the CIZ yields the better image quality. It was a wash. In other words, I was disappointed that the CIZ was worse half the time and better half the time than just cropping an image that I took at the full 200 mm. At the same time, the fact that with CIZ I could not see the focus point was really irritating. The focus frame is small to start but the second CIZ kicks in it disappears.
My 86 yr. old aunt does not want a cell phone. She wants a nice small camera she can carry in her purse to take pictures of her family and sights while traveling. She will probably keep a camera on auto all the time, has no interest in changing lenses, and wants to keep it "reasonably priced." She has no idea what cameras cost. 86 year olds generally are a little shaky and she's probably not good at pressing teeny tiny buttons. I have researched, but have come up empty. Please help!
Thank you, everyone! I am doing a lot of research based on all your recommendations -- including downloading trials of noise removal systems. I appreciate your time and willingness to help.
ecobin wrote:
I assume that you're shooting in RAW - if not, then switch to RAW.
Download trial versions of Topaz DeNoise AI and DxO Pure Raw (which I like better).
Before processing, run your RAW images through one of these and then process. That should improve your noise issue and avoid spending $$.
I really like that idea. Why do you like DxO Pure Raw better?
Gene51 wrote:
That sensor is even smaller and noisier than the G9.
Yes, I have eliminated that one from consideration.
Hello, I am having some trouble posting pics. Can someone give me good direction?
I am a birder currently using the Panasonic G9 with the Leica 100-400 lens. It is a decent set up, and the weight is good(less than 5 lbs.) but I am unhappy with the amount of noise it produces and the quality of the images in general, probably due to its small sensor. I have about $3,000 to invest in a different camera and lens, suitable for birding, with good low-light capability, and great image quality. I don't care what manufacturer, but the set up cannot be any heavier than 5 lbs. total. Any suggestions on what to purchase? Thank you!
I got an email telling me they were no longer doing paper magazines, only digital. Last week I saw that my credit card was charged without me renewing. I called and they took the charge off. Not going to pay $32 for a digital magazine.
Perhaps a custom brush in PS.
Star filter -- hadn't thought of that!
I went out last night and got a normal, nice pic. But I have seen this pic, and I think it is beautiful, but am wondering how he got this. Any ideas?
I have the same issue! Though your solution may work for you, I feel that I must caution you -- the position you are in is very bad for your back. It's probably fine in a pinch, but I wouldn't stay in that position very long or do it every day. Some of us have traded in our big gear for a mirrorless, lightweight option.
Thank you EVERYONE for these wonderful responses! I have so much to consider and I really appreciate all of your time!
I am a little overwhelmed by all the choices I have for a safe storage site to place all my best work. Right now I have the Flikr free account, which is not adequate for holding all I want it to. Is Flikr worth paying for? I want people to have access to my portfolio, but I am just a hobbyist so I am not interested in an expensive website. I know there are free ones, but are they any good? Are websites better than Flikr? A high priority for me is that it cannot be complicated or time-consuming for me to organize it and add pics to it. Thank you!