If it's just files, like jpg's, etc. then that OK. In fact, keeping all you photographs on an external hard drive is an excellent way to back them up, and it keeps your computer hard drive from filling up. The only time you have to be concerned with a complete transfer is if you're moving the entire operating system hard drive (C:) to another computer. Programs, like your photography editing program (Paint Shop Pro, Photoshop, etc.), have information that they need to run in the Registry area of the operating system. So, if you have a new laptop, AND want to run a program that's on the old laptop, AND didn't run a complete transfer, you'll have to do a new install of that program on the new laptop. That way, the necessary info the program needs to run is stored in the Registry of the new laptop.

You could caption the second one: "Edible?"

I had both of mine replaced last year. Both times, I went under with unblemished skin over my knee, and, both times, I woke to an incision about 6 - 7 inches long stapled together over my knee. I don't have any desire to see what happened in between...

After you...

I've upgraded every PSP since it was shareware. Each version added more tools while retaining the user friendly interface, and Corel x6 in no different. X6 added a 64 bit version, though, that makes PSP more efficient with larger files and memory intensive editing, but, obviously only if your system is 64 bit. That in itself was enough to make me upgrade my computer to 64 bit, and I've been well pleased with the results.

In spite of what you will hear, Fox DOES give both sides of an argument (why else would they have the viewpoints and opinions of Bob Beckel, Alan Colmes, various Democrat advisors, Geraldo Rivera, Karl Rove -- all progressive liberals in spite of their titles or the parties to which they belong). You will get stories on Fox that the other media, which are totally invested in the progressive mindset, will ridicule, downplay, or purposely NOT report. For example, you never hear reports heavily critical of Obama or the Clintons from the "mainstream media" of MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, the New York Times, et.al. while they all play a continual drumbeat of criticisms against conservative lifestyles, viewpoints, and leaders as well as talk show hosts and Fox News. Rush, Hannity, Beck, Levine all champion the conservative voice although they each may all disagree to some extent with how the others portray different facets of the conservative message.

And please note: "Conservative" does NOT equal Republican/Right -- too many Republican politicians now have moved away from a true conservative platform to a progressive viewpoint as they're more concerned with how their appearance/viewpoints will be presented by the "mainstream media". These politicians are RINO's -- Republican In Name Only. Examples are John "NoBalls" Boehner, Mitch McConnell, John McCain (unfortunately, leaders in the Republican Party), and they're more concerned with re-election and power than they are with adherence to conservatism and the Constitution. And don't be thrown off by progressive B.S. -- true conservatives ARE strict Constitutionalist.

Accordingly, based on your message, I'd say you favor the conservative message which, in my opinion, is usually heavily based on truth (with, of course, media spin based on the bias and ego of the reporter -- see Bill O'Reilly), whereas the liberal progressive message usually buries the truth under rhetorical hog droppings to justify their lifestyle's desire for acceptability as provided by the fist of government entities ranging from the local to the federal. As in the case of this president, time usually strips away the manure to reveal the truth hidden by all the liberal emotional ranting or lack of reporting.

Your best bet is to continue sampling all media to determine what is, to you, the truth, and to determine who you trust to deliver the truth. If you're open-minded, and can ignore the ad hominem attacks and argumentative misdirection/obfuscations of the subject under discussion by those who disagree, then the truth will become apparent, as well as to whom you can depend upon to provide that truth.

As a cyclist of over 30 years, I can tell you that you're absolutely correct -- they must obey the rules of the road if they are riding in traffic. If they are not, please call the police and report them. They're not doing the rest of us cyclists any good by getting the automotive public pissed off at us.

Welcome, Remington. Good to have you here.

Now that's exuberance! Wish my subjects had that feeling of freedom of self!

For comparison...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1azHYjjG_U&bpctr=1394001679

http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/creepiest-video-ever-shows-true-indoctrination/

And... GO!

Try this link to get an idea of what's available.

http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/index.asp

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Michael Reagan is adopted, and is conservative. Ron Reagan is President Reagan's natural son, and is a flaming liberal.

BTW. The Tea Party platform calls for:
Elimination of excessive taxes
Elimination of the national debt
Elimination of deficit spending; be fiscally responsible
Protection of the free market
The government to abide, i.e. follow faithfully, the Constitution of the United States
Promotion of civic responsibility
Reduction of the overall size of government
The government to believe in the American people, and allow them their freedoms
Avoidance of hate speech, violence, and extremism
Allowing citizens at the local level to determine their priorities.

Exactly which part of this do you consider scary?