Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Wonka
Oct 17, 2012 17:30:17   #
Looks like sun flare to me. Did you use a lens hood to prevent light from entering the lens.
Go to
Oct 17, 2012 16:58:56   #
I also own the 70-200 I.S and get great pics. practice, practice, practice. I would recomend trying it on the mono pod with I.S. on for sure. If you are able to get that steady of a shot on the mono pod wiith I.S off I would return the 4L for the 2.8 non I.S. Its like $1300 or even the first version of the 2.8 I.S. I believe it's also under $2000 the 70-200 2.8 I.S. II is $2200 at Adorama .com
Go to
Oct 17, 2012 16:32:30   #
Check for pricing on adorama or b&h photo these are very trustworthy and reliable sites with very competative pricing.
Go to
Sep 22, 2012 23:00:00   #
The White house lies about everthing! This is the worst presidency ever. I swear this guy is the Anti-Christ!
Go to
Sep 22, 2012 22:45:37   #
Carry a real camera! HA, LOL. Sorry I couldnt resist. First whats a retail hawk! Ha, LOL ok Im sorry...well not really, anyway Im not a wiz on the subject of sensor size and I do believe thats the issue here nothing u can do as far as i know the sensors are just to small to blow up or print anything larger than 5x6 post card. Im sure there are other setting issues here also ( contrast, exposure, lens quality) Etc. ?
Go to
Mar 29, 2012 14:29:07   #
rcrosby825 wrote:
O.K.
It's a new day. Good time to air out my ignorance and learn a thing or two.
As already stated, the blinking portions of a frame tell me that I'm blowing out the highlight and need to adjust accordingly.
I thought I had three options: faster shutter speed, smaller f-stop, or dropping my ISO. (Say from 800 to 200)
What am I missing here? Admittedly I usually shoot at 200 which is as low as my Sony will go, so I have little experience playing with ISO except in low light conditions where I need it in order to maintain an acceptable shutter speed. I'm a self described "rank amatuer" and as such don't have enough knowledge or experience to question those who have been around a while, but I'd like to understand and feel that I'm missing something here. What is it?
Thanks,
Rob
O.K. br It's a new day. Good time to air out my i... (show quote)




Your correct in addressing the exposure triangle, lowering your ISO, increasing your shutter speed or raising your f/stop will all have an effect on the exposure.
Go to
Mar 29, 2012 14:17:43   #
rpavich wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
I have been reading reviews and ogling it for some time now and finally pulled the trigger on one this morning and was just looking for a little first hand info.


What? a 275.6 in minimum focusing distance? You'll NEVER be able to take good indoor low light party shots with that!...what a piece of crap!..I'm sticking with my 50mm f/1.8!
Your an Idiot!

:)
Go to
Mar 29, 2012 14:17:18   #
rpavich wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
I have been reading reviews and ogling it for some time now and finally pulled the trigger on one this morning and was just looking for a little first hand info.


What? a 275.6 in minimum focusing distance? You'll NEVER be able to take good indoor low light party shots with that!...what a piece of crap!..I'm sticking with my 50mm f/1.8!
Your an Idiot!

:)
Go to
Mar 29, 2012 14:15:41   #
Why would tou even assume he bought a lens with a focal length like that for indoor's ?
Go to
Oct 6, 2011 02:46:30   #
As others have said they are worth the investment,great for sports, museums, long lenses, walking sticks and if you get a good heavy stable one as i have it's a great night stick/ weapon against wild animals if in the wilderness or in the city, and it's legal! You can't go wrong for the cost and yes a ball joint head no question. :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 6, 2011 01:53:12   #
Looks like it may have something to do with the shutter fist /second curtain?
Go to
Oct 6, 2011 01:27:11   #
photophly wrote:
It looks clear here....but the download is grainy and looks a bit out of focus


After down loading the picture it apeears to me that it may camera shake and not a focusing issue especially a shot of that kind of distance.
Go to
Oct 6, 2011 01:18:36   #
First I would put my Camera on a tripod to make sure its stablized and use a remote trigger if you have one to trip the shutter. If your shooting with a slr. the camera most likely has a diopeter somewhere around the eye piece to correct the view finder to the users vision just look through at the meters and points of focus and turn the diopeter until all apears clear now focus and shoot. My next recomendatiion would be to set your lens on infinity and shoot. exposure will only effect, well exposure not the focus. Hope this helps.
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.