Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joseph premanandan
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 next>>
Jun 6, 2021 09:40:20   #
I do apply rule of thirds most of the times but there are situations where I break that rule. I do “ Leading lines”,framing, symmetry. Good luck.
Go to
May 21, 2021 07:46:07   #
You need to turn of optical stabilization when you are using a tripod and to the best of my knowledge, they do not work together and in fact the opposite thing may happen leading to unstabilization. Good luck.
Go to
May 20, 2021 06:03:53   #
Only one but it takes five visits!
Go to
May 16, 2021 07:12:24   #
Ednsb wrote:
My camera has a built-in function for focus staking which I use for macros and closeup then process in Affinity. I was just reading an article about focus stacking in landscapes and it made me wonder. 'what if I used the in-camera function?" I am thinking of setting the initial focal point at the hyperfocal distance (determined by PhotoPills) then shooting off a series of images. I can't think of a reason it wouldn't work but we are socked into today so I have no way to test it.

Thoughts?
My camera has a built-in function for focus stakin... (show quote)


My Fuji camera does not have that option of focus staking. i try to do that in photoshop by taking the picture of the landscape at different focus points and then merging them in photoshop and it works for me.
Go to
Nov 15, 2020 07:52:41   #
Anthony Morganti has produced many instructional videos on photoshop and i found them to be very useful. Good luck.
Go to
Nov 12, 2020 06:50:59   #
my understanding of ISO is the sensitivity of the image sensor.By increasing its values you are getting a well exposed picture especially in situations where the light is dim or not so bright. During the film era, we use to have high sensitivity as high as 1000 0r low sensitivity as low as 100. In the digital world, the ISO replaces that.
Go to
Nov 3, 2020 09:55:58   #
chfrus wrote:
Don't. They will be disappointed and will not take into consideration that you are a novice. Their expectations will be high not knowing anything about photography.

As long you tell them that you are an amateur photographer and make them aware that the photos you took may or may not come out right. His friend’s family can not afford a professional wedding photographer and Otherwise , They would have a wedding without the photos and nothing to look back on. So I would oblige to their request and then hope and pray that the photos come out reasonably well.
Go to
Nov 3, 2020 06:51:26   #
my suggestion is to do the best you can. Explain to your friend that you are not a professional wedding photographer and that this wedding is most likely is a one time special event. Explain to them that Some or many of your photos may not be to the wedding party's liking. But if they still insist that you should be their photographer no matter what, then go for it. Good luck.
Go to
Nov 2, 2020 05:26:40   #
Anthony Morganty has good instructional videos on y tube about sky replacement techniques. hopefully that will help you.
Go to
Nov 1, 2020 10:08:02   #
I own Fuji X-T3 mirrorless and i like it. it is very versatile and so far i like it and i have not seen any down side to it. I have also heard good things about Sony. Good Luck.
Go to
Oct 25, 2020 08:45:50   #
ELNikkor wrote:
At this point, without personal verification, it is just hearsay to me. B&H should be notified and complained to/given a chance to clarify if in fact it was their initiative that became political. This may just be a problem that others created, so don't go jumping ship from a great company because of a possible fluke of some sort.
People have the right to express their opinion.People even have the right to jump ships if they want to.there are many other great global and local companies other than B&H. some times great companies seem to forget where they came from and their humble beginnings.
Go to
Oct 24, 2020 18:31:34   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
And what is wrong with an image being a "Creation"? Every image is one. I don't know any photographer who decides on what techniques to use in order to be considered the "Greatest Gift from God". I certainly don't. I just make my art to please myself. If others like it, fine. I just resent being called dishonest when all I am trying to do it produce photographs to the best of my ability in the same ways photographers have done since it was invented. By the way, not every photograph captures a Unique Moment in Time. Ever hear of a time exposure? Or is that deceptive also?
And what is wrong with an image being a "Crea... (show quote)
I agree with you totally. I some time get annoyed with those so called purists who think any post editing is wrong.Then why should we have Lightroom and photoshop?
Go to
Oct 24, 2020 14:38:58   #
rmalarz wrote:
I posed the same question, in a way. https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-669947-1.html It's gone on for 12 or so pages now. There are a number of opinions expressed. Under certain circumstances, putting things into photographs that weren't there can be suitable for advertising or commercial work.

Personally, I have no issue with folks who want to put stuff in a photograph that wasn't there at the time of taking the photograph. I have an integrity issue with people who do so and want others to think that's what they captured initially and through some incredible amount of talent, which isn't existent in reality, they produced an incredible photograph. Sure, create a category of "creative spaces" and let folks replace whatever they want. Just be honest about it.

In my own photography, I alter the processing times to suit the tonal range. I use burning and dodging techniques to make slight additional adjustments to tonal ranges, but I don't put stuff in there that wasn't in the original scene. That is disingenuous. It's a matter of personal integrity.

From the viewpoint of the software manufacturers, it's a marketing strategy. We'll give you the tools to accomplish that which you couldn't do on your own. That's my perspective.
--Bob
I posed the same question, in a way. https://www.u... (show quote)
it is not disingenuous if you are transparent and admit to it at the vey outset. current photography is also an art than just plain photos.Then one can say that postpricessing is disingenuous and that is not true. Even during the film era ,the photographers used to do touch up for portrait photos and not many complained about it. Even the current digital cameras edit your photos after or during shooting.Are we then should switch back to film mode. A painter makes up skies while painting ,is he fake then? The sky replacement option has been there in photoshopCC for years and now it has been perfected with Luminar4 and photoshop elements. The only area of photography where postprocessing is not appropriate is photo journalism and in all other areas it is a fair game.Let us remember again photography is an art and a science

i
Go to
Oct 21, 2020 09:51:58   #
will47 wrote:
I just watched a tutorial by Aaron Nace in regards to the new Adobe sky replacement tool. According to him it is out and ready to use. I don't have it. I checked my update status on Adobe and I am up to date. I had read online an announcement from Adobe that it would be out on the 18th or 19th but not here. Any idea as to why I wouldn't have it yet?
, you can do it in photoshop CC and there is a good video or YouTube by Anthony Morganti as how to do it But i prefer the sky replacement tool in Luminar 4 and it is very user friendly and it looks more natural and you have so many different skies to choose from. Good luck.
Go to
Sep 23, 2020 10:05:44   #
gvarner wrote:
I’m not sure why using Auto ISO would even be an issue with a TTL flash since the flash itself is the controlling factor for exposing the subject. A high shutter speeds reduces the effect of ambient light. The aperture regulates the DoF, and a higher ISO can give you a little more reach with the flash. I’m probably all wet on this but it’s the way that I look at it.
if it is a single portrait I use f/5.6 with a shutter speed of 1/125sec or 1/250sec with Is ISO between 400 to 800 and I use manual flash indoor but outdoor I use TTL flash and for group photos I use f/8 or f/11 if necessary and that works for me
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.