Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: kimberliswenson
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Nov 7, 2012 14:27:36   #
In an 8x8 pilates studio with mirrors on all 4 walls.
WORST SHOOT EVER!
Go to
Apr 18, 2012 01:30:10   #
Does anyone know when Adobe is going to launch their Creative Cloud service? I am curious how much this is going to cost monthly. I can't find it on an internet search anywhere....
Go to
Feb 14, 2012 02:09:11   #
It is gook on the sensor. Take your camera to a professional camera store and ask to have it cleaned. I just had mine done for $40, and had my camera back in 2 days.
Go to
Feb 7, 2012 09:42:05   #
Does anyone know where I can download a generic contract for weddings and events? I suddenly find myself booked for two weddings this summer and I want to make sure I dot all my I's and cross all my T's.
Go to
Jan 16, 2012 23:03:52   #
Thank you so much for listing this website! I have searched everything I can think of and couldn't find this information.
I will NOT be putting this flash on my camera!! Anyone know where to get a speedlight cheap?? Lol.




GoofyNewfie wrote:
Iffy, it's over 9 volts.
Nikon SB 800 is less than 4- half the Vivitar

http://www.botzilla.com/photo/strobeVolts.html

I'm supposed to be putting a slide show together.

This site is addictive!
Go to
Jan 16, 2012 22:45:27   #
I have a Nikon D7000 and a Nikon D60, both of which I love dearly. I have a Vivitar Auto Thyristor 3700 that I use to use with
my film camera. The flash is still in perfect working order. My question is can I use it on either of my Nikons, specifically my D7000. I have been told conflicting things....that the flash can fry the electronics in the camera, that it will work but may not fire in sync, you name it. I would really like to know if it will work. Unfortunately a speedlight is just not in my budget and won't be any time soon. I don't want any judgements or to be told I am crazy for trying it....I am asking for advice from someone who knows definitively....I have NOT attached it to my camera or tried to fire it yet.
Go to
Jan 8, 2012 12:36:54   #
I absolutely agree with this!! I would just add that you can rent the lenses and test them out....or even rent them for the event without having to invest in glass for just one occasion. Your money would be better spent on glass for your "regular" photography needs.




MT Shooter wrote:
You need FAST lenses, at least f2.8 or faster. If your 50mm is a f1.8 it might be your best best. If your 18-135mm is the F4-5.6 model it will blur under the best light unless you step up to ISO 1600, and then the pics won't be worth the time due to all the digital noise. An 85mm F1.8 and a 135mm F2 were the 2 lenses I had on my bodies back when I did weddings in the 80's. All manual equipment then, no AF to help out, my eyes won't let me do that anymore.
As far as cost and investment, you won't get asked to do many weddings without the equipment to do a nice job. Kind of a Catch 22 situation.
You need FAST lenses, at least f2.8 or faster. If ... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 8, 2012 12:33:59   #
This is absolutely true!! You HAVE to be in the pictures!!!



mgemstone wrote:
So the bride & groom will have wedding pictures without you in them! That's so wrong/ How about a compromise - hire a wedding photographer with the understanding that you will be taking some pictures occassionally and then give them to the photographer to be included in their photo book. That way you can have the best of both possibilities.
Go to
Jan 8, 2012 12:32:51   #
I would offer to do wedding portraits either before or after the big day and find someone else to take care of the actual wedding pictures. Honestly, you need to enjoy your son's big day...it is a big day for you too and there are so many other things that will need your attention that you will feel completely overwhelmed. Nothing says that you can't take pictures at the wedding, but I think I would put the stress of the ceremony and formals on someone else. By offering to do the special portraits the day before, everyone should have their tuxes and dresses and you can be there to capture that first special moment when they see each other for the first time....and it may be more special to them and relieve some of the stress of the big day for them as well. If they are die hard traditionalist as to not seeing each other before the wedding, doing the portraits the day after can offer more candid and relaxed images, as the stress of the big day is past and they can just be themselves. It may also alleviate the amount of money spent on a pro photographer....they will probably like your pictures better anyway....and you will take better pictures without the stress of knowing it is a one shot deal.

Just my two cents......
Go to
Jan 7, 2012 22:02:02   #
If I am understanding you correctly, you want ideas for new pictures, not a choice from these. I would focus on hands on his face, or a nose to nose, a gentle hug if he will tolerate it. It is a wonderful idea to have him as a therapy animal. I have 4 llamas and as hard as I try, I can't get them to be that sociable.

The key to placing in the contest is showing the emotion behind the shot....I think a good quality black and white would be wonderful. Remember to focus in on the interaction and emotion between him and the person(s) and use a wide aperture to blur the background and eliminate anything distracting from the subject. Use a fast lens, or rent one if you don't have one so you can avoid using the flash. They can be rented pretty cheap. Also, check the contest rules about post processing. Good luck!! Post your picture when you are done!!
Go to
Dec 22, 2011 03:13:18   #
Most labs offer a free set of evaluation prints....including both color corrected and regular....so that you can see their quality. See if your lab offers this. It is a quick phone call or email and well worth your time. I also wouldn't cost you much just to order a couple of color corrected prints to see what you get...
Go to
Dec 20, 2011 21:44:35   #
Go to www.imagequix.com. They have pay as you go and different pricing levels. I have been happy so far.
Go to
Dec 16, 2011 11:57:38   #
At least she came to me before she took it back to the store...that would have been embarrassing......


brokeweb wrote:
kimberliswenson wrote:
I have a friend that bought a new camera and after a week she said is quit working and the screen went out. She could see through the view finder, but couldn't get it to take pictures. She asked if I would look at it for her. I put in new batteries and she was ready to go....lol.


I feel for "your friend".
Go to
Dec 16, 2011 11:41:38   #
I have a friend that bought a new camera and after a week she said is quit working and the screen went out. She could see through the view finder, but couldn't get it to take pictures. She asked if I would look at it for her. I put in new batteries and she was ready to go....lol.
Go to
Dec 9, 2011 15:56:37   #
I am lucky enough to have two cameras and a harness so I can carry both.....this way I can use both lenses and not have to worry about a missed shot or changing lenses.
I shoot with a Nikon D7000 and a D60....
If this isn't possible for you, I would go with the telephoto and bump up the ISO. You will have more versatility with it. Vary your shots between close ups of their reactions and group shots, and try to include the animals and trainer in some....offering a wider variety usually works well in situations like this. I might suggest shooting in aperture or shutter priority mode depending on your chosen depth of field and the lighting, and you will be less likely to get blurred or over/underexposed pics while you are quickly going from shot to shot....one less setting to worry about in the fast pace.


nickims2 wrote:
Thanks guys,
I appreciate the advice. I am torn between the telephoto and the shorter lens....I think the event will be held in an area off to itself so getting over heads won't be a problem..I just worry about lens blur with the slower telephoto (I don't have a super lens with stabilization -yet). Maybe if the light is bright enough that won't be too much of a problem. (My Canon's ISO only goes to 1800 - don't have a super camera yet either). Seems like everything would be overexposed with the ISO set that high).
Thanks guys, br I appreciate the advice. I am tor... (show quote)
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.