I have changed my mind on this topic. I used to think that we were at war with Radical Muslims. But in fact we are at war with ALL of the Muslim religion. The Muslim religion is the only religion that has one of it's commands demanding the k*****g of Non-Believers. The stated purpose of the Muslim faith is making the world a Muslim, one religion world. The Muslin religion is anathama to Judean Christian values. The Muslim faith is a 7th century faith which, as it's goal, wants to take the entire world back to that time. Unless the western cuture learns that the Muslin Religion wants to take over, the western way of life is destined to end. WE ARE AT WAR WITH MUSLIMS. believe it. Am I an islamophobic YES No other faith would force my grand kids to practice that faith. But the Muslim religion would. Wake up America!!

In case you do not know her, Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer. This is from a recent column she wrote. Mrs. Thompson has Barack Obama pegged, right down to the jug ears.

Does she ever have hussein obama figured out.

SYLVIA THOMPSON- WOW! Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.
Sylvia Thompson on Obama's "legacy"...




THIS IS WHAT SHE HAS TO SAY:


To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.


The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.


I focus on white leaders, because w****s are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.


Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.


It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.


This is my take.


Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.


Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.


Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.


He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.


Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is C*******t. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep C*******t influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.


Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for i*****l a***ns, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.


Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.


It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this h**eful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.


These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."


The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.


Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 p**********l race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.


Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 e******n cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.

You see people who live in rural or affluent areas of the US are insulated from the insanity of open borders unchecked immigration illegal and legal. If we continue when, not if it hits you it will be too late. Because it will in the end ultimately affect you.
Trump is the only one that stands against this insanity.
All the other candidates condone this insanity.
Here are a couple of articles, and if you cannot comprehend this reality that is sure to come your way.
I don't know what to say.
But my support for Trump remains steadfast.




http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/14/california-markets-roiled-by-water-pressure-fluctuations/

http://rense.com/general96/lessameric.html


My WTF article

http://www.progressivestoday.com/illegal-aliens-demand-better-work-conditions/

This young lady gets it.



"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who v**e for a living"

This was written by a 21 yr old female who gets it. It's her future she’s worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare that she’s being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.


Nov 18, 2011

Put me in charge . . .

Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50kg bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Healthcare. The first thing I'd do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, wh**ever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good..”

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND while you are on Government subsistence, you no longer can V**E! Yes that is correct. For you to v**e would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from v****g while you are receiving a Government welfare check. If you want to v**e, then get a job

This so called Black L***s M****r group needs to be shown for what they really are, just another r****t h**e group. The only thing I could add to this article is to ask the question when are black folks in America going to wake up? They keep listening to the lies and broken promises of democrats. They have been v****g almost in lock step for democrats for decades but the plight of the black person in America just keeps getting more dire.

This article does a pretty good job of showing just what frauds B*M and democrats are. It is not even arguable.

From the Wall Street Journal

The Myths of Black L***s M****r
The movement has won over Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. But what if its claims are fiction?

By HEATHER MAC DONALD
Feb. 11, 2016 7:08 p.m. ET

A television ad for Hillary Clinton’s p**********l campaign now airing in South Carolina shows the candidate declaring that “too many encounters with law enforcement end tragically.” She later adds: “We have to face up to the hard t***h of injustice and s******c r****m.”

Her Democratic p**********l rival, Bernie Sanders, met with the Rev. Al Sharpton on Wednesday. Mr. Sanders then tweeted that “As President, let me be very clear that no one will fight harder to end r****m and reform our broken criminal justice system than I will.” And he appeared on the TV talk show “The View” saying, “It is not acceptable to see unarmed people being shot by police officers.”

Apparently the Black L***s M****r movement has convinced Democrats and progressives that there is an epidemic of r****t white police officers k*****g young black men. Such rhetoric is going to heat up as Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Sanders court minority v**ers before the Feb. 27 South Carolina primary.

But what if the Black L***s M****r movement is based on fiction? Not just the fictional account of the 2014 police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., but the utter misrepresentation of police shootings generally.

To judge from Black L***s M****r protesters and their media and political allies, you would think that k**ler cops pose the biggest threat to young black men today. But this perception, like almost everything else that many people think they know about fatal police shootings, is wrong.

The Washington Post has been gathering data on fatal police shootings over the past year and a half to correct acknowledged deficiencies in federal tallies. The emerging data should open many eyes.

For starters, fatal police shootings make up a much larger proportion of white and Hispanic homicide deaths than black homicide deaths. According to the Post database, in 2015 officers k**led 662 w****s and Hispanics, and 258 b****s. (The overwhelming majority of all those police-shooting victims were attacking the officer, often with a gun.) Using the 2014 homicide numbers as an approximation of 2015’s, those 662 white and Hispanic victims of police shootings would make up 12% of all white and Hispanic homicide deaths. That is three times the proportion of black deaths that result from police shootings.

The lower proportion of black deaths due to police shootings can be attributed to the lamentable black-on-black homicide rate. There were 6,095 black homicide deaths in 2014—the most recent year for which such data are available—compared with 5,397 homicide deaths for w****s and Hispanics combined. Almost all of those black homicide victims had black k**lers.

Police officers—of all races—are also disproportionately endangered by black assailants. Over the past decade, according to FBI data, 40% of cop k**lers have been black. Officers are k**led by b****s at a rate 2.5 times higher than the rate at which b****s are k**led by police.

Some may find evidence of police bias in the fact that b****s make up 26% of the police-shooting victims, compared with their 13% representation in the national population. But as residents of poor black neighborhoods know too well, violent crimes are disproportionately committed by b****s. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, b****s were charged with 62% of all robberies, 57% of murders and 45% of assaults in the 75 largest U.S. counties in 2009, though they made up roughly 15% of the population there.

Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force.

The Black L***s M****r movement claims that white officers are especially prone to shooting innocent b****s due to racial bias, but this too is a myth. A March 2015 Justice Department report on the Philadelphia Police Department found that black and Hispanic officers were much more likely than white officers to shoot b****s based on “threat misperception”—that is, the mistaken belief that a civilian is armed.

A 2015 study by University of Pennsylvania criminologist Greg Ridgeway, formerly acting director of the National Institute of Justice, found that, at a crime scene where gunfire is involved, black officers in the New York City Police Department were 3.3 times more likely to discharge their weapons than other officers at the scene.

The Black L***s M****r movement has been stunningly successful in changing the subject from the realities of violent crime. The world knows the name of Michael Brown but not Tyshawn Lee, a 9-year-old black child lured into an alley and k**led by gang members in Chicago last fall. Tyshawn was one of dozens of black children gunned down in America last year. The Baltimore Sun reported on Jan. 1: “Blood was shed in Baltimore at an unprecedented pace in 2015, with mostly young, black men shot to death in a near-daily crush of violence.”

Those were black lives that mattered, and it is a scandal that outrage is heaped less on the dysfunctional culture that produces so many victims than on the police officers who try to protect them.

Ms. Mac Donald is the Thomas W. Smith fellow at the Manhattan Institute and author of “The War on Cops,” forthcoming in July from Encounter Books.