Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ecommons
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 next>>
Jul 17, 2022 09:57:10   #
At my age, I don't want to invest in a whole new technology. I was around when the SLR was beginning to gain popularity ( I still have my Leica with the viewfinder) The SLR has matured, but it shouldn't be allowed to die out. There are still plenty of photographers who have a considerable investment in their SLR systems. I think the camera companies show still support those people.
Go to
Jul 14, 2022 10:31:08   #
Darn....I just swatted a fly and at my age, bedwetting could return
Go to
Jul 13, 2022 11:39:53   #
Yep... did this several years ago to photograph the eclipse
Go to
Jun 30, 2022 18:37:16   #
They are either half good or half bad..... but never terrible
Go to
Jun 30, 2022 18:34:25   #
mr spock wrote:
I guess it's about 1935. Not sure when Ford began installing V-8s


They started putting V8s in the 1932. This is what they called a little Deuce Coupe in the hard top version
Go to
Jun 27, 2022 11:55:14   #
Scruples wrote:
When I had a film camera it had one battery. It was easy to use the camera and easy to replace the batteries. Then, it happened. As cameras became a little more complex so did the batteries. Replacing them became time consuming and expensive. Then cameras required different types for the same model. Batteries also became rechargeable. So it was somewhat easier and affordable. Now with mirrorless cameras, these models eat more battery power requiring frequent charging. Usually, you get a single battery recharger with each camera you buy. I now have six batteries and one charger. So I purchased a Jupio dedicated duo battery charger. I can charge two batteries simultaneously. In addition, the charger doubles as a power bank for my cell phone
When I had a film camera it had one battery. It wa... (show quote)


When I got my digital, I bought two extra chargers and batteries. One for the camera, one for home charging and one kept in the car for when I traveled. A long trip, I take all three chargers I always have plenty of battery power at least one fresh battery when I'm out shooting.

Thinking back, that's what I did with film. One in the camera, one in my pocket and three or four in the cooler in the car.
Go to
Jun 8, 2022 16:17:01   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I watched a YouTube video about the largest model train setup in some state. There was a large sign that said something like "No 360° Cameras". Do you have any idea why they would ban them? The sign didn't mention drones.


There are such thing as a 360 degree camera. Older ones used film? You may have to explain this to younger photographers. Basically the ones I saw had lenses that had a 180 degree lens. You took a picture, rotated the camera and took the other pictures. These were stitched together in a darkroom. (You may have to explain that to the younger photographers.

They are available in digital today

The best 360 cameras are highly specialized tools, enabling you to capture photographs and videos that are utterly unique.

Able to shoot images and footage in a navigable 360-degree space, the best 360 cameras can be used to create interactive content that can be navigated with a mouse or touchscreen. There's nothing quite as immersive as 360-degree imagery, whether you're capturing an epic landscape, a bustling street scene, or even a breath-taking bike ride through thundering terrain.

While 360-degree files are big and unwieldy (often requiring you to stitch together video from more than one camera), and require the right software to process, they are incredibly useful and versatile.

You don't only have to use them to create 360-degree content though; you can also dive in post-capture and pick out a slice of the scene that you want to convert into a more traditional "flat" image or video. This means you can use a 360-degree camera as a great kind of catch-all camera, for moments when you want to capture the action but aren't sure where it's going to be happening.
Go to
Jun 7, 2022 16:44:13   #
jakester69 wrote:
I would like to know if there are any black & white film photographers out there. I would love to hear any input from them . I do 35mm, 6x7 and 4x5 formats and do all processing and printing. Drop me a line at
finnl61r@gmail.com Thanks.


Gave up film long ago. But I still do Black and White Digital. Some subjects tell a better story in B&W.
Go to
Jun 5, 2022 16:36:12   #
jimopho wrote:
There's a building in my town that is often photographed and the owner has expressed that he does not want those photographs to be sold because his logo is on the building. It is in a public area and the building has been there for a very long time. Can he legally prevent people from selling photographs of his storefront? Thanks.


If it's on a public street, the exterior it's fair game. You can photograph. But there's a catch. Prior to 1990, there was no copyright for buildings. If the building was built before 1990 you're probably safe. If it was built after 1990 you can photograph it as it is in the public domain. You may not be able to legally sell the photograph you took.

As to the logo, that probably is copyrighted.

So in my opinion, if you are on the street, you can legally take a photograph for your own use. If you intend to sell the photograph, you should consult an attorney that deals with copyrights.
Go to
Jun 5, 2022 13:32:32   #
Bridges wrote:
I see so many highly manipulated photos these days from over-emphasized HDR to surreal images in overly saturated landscapes to layered multiple images that aren't real. Many of these photos of which I speak seem more akin to illustrated art forms than to photography. While many are visually pleasing, it seems removed from what I believe photography is. On the other hand, in our modern society would traditional photography exist? Our society wants results yesterday, never mind having to wait three days for photos to come from a lab. Yes, there were the one-hour labs in drug stores but a lot of serious photographers would not trust valued shots to one of those labs run by a minimum wage clerk. When there is so much to distract us from television with 1000 stations, wine tours, extended travel while staying in an air B&Bs, casinos, adventure destinations, sports events, etc. There just might not be enough time or interest for old-style photography. Digital photography has saved the day in that respect as people can whip out their cell phones and nail a beautiful sunrise or sunset. What is your opinion?
I see so many highly manipulated photos these days... (show quote)


We did manipulate photos in the Darkroom. I enjoyed the experiences of the old film cameras. But, you had to wait until your film was processed to determine that you had overexposed the entire roll, because you forgot your light meter was set for ASA 25 and you were shooting ASA 100 (or higher film) . If you didn't have a darkroom, you had to wait for processing and printing.

However, I have a digital SLR, and I enjoy it. I can see if my pix were framed right, the exposure was right and different images of the subject. Try that with a 20 exposure roll of Kodachrome. Digital is the savior of time, and chemical darkrooms. It can preserve the purist photographer and create the experiment photographer.

As to the cell phone.....the poloroid of digital photography..... well sometimes. But, I still get out in the wilds with digital SLR.
Go to
May 17, 2022 12:30:51   #
I enjoy going to that area of New Mexico
Go to
May 17, 2022 12:30:41   #
I enjoy going to that area of New Mexico
Go to
May 16, 2022 15:43:45   #
Windows 10 update caused a lot of problems with other programs too. I think Microsoft did this on purpose to force you into Windows 11
Go to
May 7, 2022 12:14:47   #
jaymatt wrote:
I just read a definition of landscape photography: "Landscape photography is simply photography of landscapes.”

Who would ever have thought?


Landscape photography is simple and easy. Landscape Photographers make it an ordeal. Never underestimate the human ability to complicate things
Go to
May 2, 2022 13:03:10   #
Som Berthiot Paris Flor 50 mm F/2.8 Lens f. Alsaflex
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.