Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CTTonymm
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28 next>>
Apr 12, 2024 18:14:13   #
User ID wrote:
Your thread title is a bit amusing. You have a "Question for Photojournalists" ? But then, to whom have you presented said question ? I really wish I could thank you in advance for some upcoming entertainment, but reruns of reruns of reruns just gets stale and worn out.


What ??? Your response is not helping anyone. Suggest you cut us all some slack and just don't reply if you can't be helpful and respectful.
Go to
Apr 9, 2024 10:49:32   #
Jklovell wrote:
So, are you saying they don’t make the Gold Fiber Silk anymore? The reason I picked this one is because the only representation I could find of Baryta Papers showed this one as having the most texture. I felt like that would break up the gloss. I don’t like gloss or, I didn’t before this. Hahnemuhle makes a matte baryta paper, I just discovered but I can’t see how that would work. Maybe it would be better than regular matte paper, in that it might not scratch as badly. Regular paper is fine with me as long as you handle really dark prints or dark areas of a print with care. I’m gonna look for that paper you were talking about. If it’s better than this, I want it.
So, are you saying they don’t make the Gold Fiber ... (show quote)


Again, recommend you try (sample kit ?) one of the Red River Baryta papers - Big Bend Baryta is smooth/semi-gloss and Palo Duro Baryta Fiber is Satin Semi-gloss (slightly more texture that Big Bend). Both come in rolls and are a lot less expensive than Hahnemule/Ilford papers - worth checking ? Here's a comparison of the two: https://www.redrivercatalog.com/infocenter/big-bend-baryta-vs-palo-duro-baryta-fiber.html
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 16:30:24   #
MJPerini wrote:
I will second Baryta papers. My favorite was Ilford Gold Fiber Silk, used it for over 10 years until they lost their supplier. If you want to know How good Baryta coated paper is, try to find Michale Reichman's Old article "Battle of the Barytas" He reviewed the Ilford, Canon and Hahnemule offerings and picked Ilford --I'm down to my last roll.
The Great B&W Fiber based Printing papers were all Baryta coated so it even has a familiar smell.
Because of the whiteness of Baryta, the papers also exhibit some of the widest color Gamuts and contrast ranges.
They really benefit from the 11 ink 10 Channel Pigment inks in the high end Epson Photo Printers.
Results can be stunning.
I will second Baryta papers. My favorite was Ilfo... (show quote)


Any comments/comparisons for Red River Baryta papers to Hahnemule or other baryta papers. ? I have very impressed with RR Big Bend Baryta 310 for both B&W and color prints.
Go to
Apr 3, 2024 12:03:26   #
Dikdik wrote:
I have a PowerEx battery charger and have used it for several years. It's quite elaborate and allows you to charge/fix four AA or AAA, NiMH or NiCD. It does not do lithium. It is fully configurable and can be used to bring batteries up to full charge level. Some chargers only charge to the minimum capacity of all the batteries being charged, with a slow degradation of the batteries. This repairs that. It's fully programmable. The downside is that it is awfully expensive, about $100 Canadian. Not mine, but similar:

https://mahaenergy.com/mh-c9000pro/
I have a PowerEx battery charger and have used it ... (show quote)


Thanks all - just the quality of responses I expected from Hoggers. I ordered a Powerex 940 and will condition, analyze and maintain/sort out my multiple AA/AAA’s confidently.
Go to
Apr 2, 2024 16:09:10   #
La Crosse model BC-700 -- unfortunately - "Retired" 🥲
Go to
Apr 2, 2024 14:06:52   #
Thx - looking for chargers that Hoggers have found reliable with the extra features. Lots of unknown brands with hype …
Go to
Apr 2, 2024 11:46:17   #
I'm seeking a better battery charger that will display state of charge, do rapid charging or more gentle/thorough slow charging. Currently using Panasonic BQ-CCSS chargers for Eneloop AA and AAA Ni-MH batteries. Any recommendations on your experiences here ? I have a large stable of batteries, some are getting long in tooth and I want to get max useage. Also, any thoughts on minimum useful discharge percentage before "retirement" ?

Thanks for ideas.
Go to
Mar 31, 2024 15:21:56   #
CTTonymm wrote:
Do all Costco stores in the United States still carry the Kirkland brand of glossy papers?

Steve


Steve: our Costco stores in Connecticut currently carry/list both the 4X6 and 8.5x11 glossy paper on the online website, but show the 8.5x11 as out of stock at the moment. Perhaps the supply is locked up on a circling freighter off California ?[/quote]

Or maybe down in Baltimore harbor !
Go to
Mar 31, 2024 15:18:01   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Do any of you save the monthly ON1 Loyalty Rewards? I have an ON1 folder with 143 files, many of the monthly rewards. These downloads are mostly skies, and presets.


I import and save most of them. They appear as options, then, in ON1 Presets, Filters and options in Effects drop downs to be applied and adjusted from there. I subscribe to ON1+ for all the training and reference videos (many) for future re-education and reminders (my brain somehow doesn’t seem to remember all the details as well - I wonder why that is ?).
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 21:05:41   #
I'm paranoid from earlier Epson printers where fighting clogged nozzles were a regular issue. I now have an Epson ET-8550 and run a scheduled half page print from Qimage One app for glossy paper (using office plain paper) and a Black ink selected only for matte paper selection every three days. (The Black only for matte forces printer to use the matte black ink vs. the "glossy" black ink). No clogs so far - maybe will decrease frequency as I hear successful extended scheduled printing reports like yours. The 8550 prints are outstanding quality and I now am reading that the dye inks from Epson are much improved on longevity.
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 17:12:57   #
drsdayton wrote:
It seems that Qimage Ultimate Software doesn't play with Mac...


Qimage One is the Mac version. Works great, exercises my ET-8550 every three days - and I strongly recommend both.
Go to
Jan 6, 2024 18:39:30   #
MJPerini wrote:
Sd to lightening adapters are common

Do you intend to edit on the iPad? on new ones it is possible but not terribly sophisticated.
A better strategy is to edit on your computer, make folders of edited JPEGS and move those to the iPad
If you have a Mac it is really simple , import your folder into PGOTOS as an album and you can then move the whole album to the iPad with Air Drop (all wireless)
You can also 'Publish' or share that album on iCloud photo sharing and invite only who you want.
It doesn't make a lot of sense to clutter a device with limited storage with loads of big files.
The Latest iPads have the ability to have an external drive (or USb3 Memory stick) you could also do it that way which would be cross platform.
Sd to lightening adapters are common br br Do you... (show quote)


I think this is a typo - import into PHOTOS app is correct ?
Go to
Dec 25, 2023 15:26:59   #
Ednsb wrote:
Mac mini’s are the best value on the market but as the poster is a pc guy I can only wish him a Merry Christmas.


How do we (you) know OP is a pc person ? I don’t see that ?
Go to
Dec 15, 2023 17:06:16   #
burkphoto wrote:
Thanks for jogging my memory.


No jogging here. Slow walk brings back some !
Go to
Dec 15, 2023 14:06:17   #
burkphoto wrote:
Epson ET-8550 if a 17" wide throat is enough. It uses bottles of dye ink.

DO NOT make borderless prints with it if you want it to last. The ink overspray will ruin it.

The Canon Pro 200 replaces the 100. Ink is expensive.

If you need wider than 17", look at Canon and Epson websites for their wide format professional printers. The larger the cartridges, the less expensive the ink...


I own and really like the Epson-8550 - but max width is 13". Max length depends on how long a piece of paper you feed into the rear flat feed slot.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.