Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: user2071
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 68 next>>
Oct 11, 2011 09:58:19   #
Ljensen wrote:
Has anyone tried the Pocket Light Meter app for iPhone/iPod/iPad? I've been playing with it on my iPhone and it seems to be pretty accurate. It's free, so can't beat the price!

Why? I've bought an old Nikon AI-S 200mm f/4 lens on eBay that only works in manual exposure mode on my cameras. Anyway, I'm having fun with it and my iPhone light meter!

I still remember when my dad used to take slide film pictures with an old Vivitar 35mm and use a hand-held light meter. Then when our relatives would visit, he'd get out the slide projector and do a slide show. Times have changed!
Has anyone tried the Pocket Light Meter app for iP... (show quote)


Does the iPhone also make phone calls? It seems to do everything else, so I was just wondering:-)

Anyway, I can't imagine how a light meter built into a cell phone would work. I'm not doubting you, but getting lost in the cross-over technology.

I use a handheld meter sometimes. It's a backup when I want a second opinion, particularly in bright sunlight where high contrast shadows are a problem. Then, a handheld's ability to read the light itself rather than the light reflected off an object becomes important. I've got an old one I picked up on ebay. Looks brand new. but is probably is 20 years old.

Aside from your iPhone, you can find used light meters cheap on eBay or from vendors that sell used. New ones are expensive.

Know what the meter is measuring: they don't all measure light the same way and it makes a difference. Some are designed to use with flash units or studio lights -- probably not what you need. Some allow spot metering (but not many).
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 20:04:02   #
johnr9999 wrote:
fivedawgz wrote:
I started this thread to define what we mean when we talk about different types of photography, so we at least are all talking about the same thing when we use the same words.

I am baffled how a discussion of the meaning of words in context could wind up having anything to do with serial killers and morality. We were talking about PHOTOGRAPHY, defining words used to describe PHOTOGRAPHIC STYLES.

The point was to enable us to talk to each other without pointless arguments based on misunderstanding. I apologize for foolishly assuming it was possible to actually have a productive and constructive dialogue. What WAS I thinking?
I started this thread to define what we mean when ... (show quote)


the point I was trying to make is that if you eliminate morality from a discussion of whether pornography is art is impossible.
quote=fivedawgz I started this thread to define w... (show quote)


We weren't discussing whether pornography is art. We weren't discussing whether or not ANY kind of photography is art. We were not discussing ART.

We were defining what we MEAN by pornography, amongst other types of photography involving nudes or near nudes. That's it. Just what the words mean so that we could discuss things and understand one another.

Whether pornography is art is entirely OFF the topic of this thread. That's one of the dangers of coming late to the party: you miss the introductions.
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 17:13:14   #
I started this thread to define what we mean when we talk about different types of photography, so we at least are all talking about the same thing when we use the same words.

I am baffled how a discussion of the meaning of words in context could wind up having anything to do with serial killers and morality. We were talking about PHOTOGRAPHY, defining words used to describe PHOTOGRAPHIC STYLES.

The point was to enable us to talk to each other without pointless arguments based on misunderstanding. I apologize for foolishly assuming it was possible to actually have a productive and constructive dialogue. What WAS I thinking?
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 16:38:34   #
augs10 wrote:
My friend shooting trap


That's a wonderful composition. It tells a story. It has a wonderful moodiness. Very nice.
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 13:13:02   #
johnrennie wrote:
I would LOVE to shoot in Brazil. It's on my bucket-list!
You're lucky.


I'd like to visit there! It is such a beautiful and interesting place.
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 13:02:31   #
johnr9999 wrote:
Sure art is in the eye of the beholder. Some serial killers considered their "work" art. Why is it not? Because the teachings of the culture say it is not. This is the morality that 5dawgz seems afraid of. It is what we say it is. Do we want to get so far out as to consider Ted Bundy or Richard Ramirez artists?


Excuse me, but I NEVER suggested that morality has anything to do with art ... its definition or practice ... not once in ANY post on this or any other forum. I started a thread by asking if anyone had any thoughts about the definitions of various terms referring to TYPES OF PHOTOGRAPHY ... and I SPECIFICALLY said that God, religion, morality, or any such thing has NOTHING to do with art and never had.

Not only did I not SAY it, but it goes against absolutely everything I believe in.

I know that the format of the forum's post with quotes within quotes can be confusing, but why don't you NOT make things personal as a matter of principle? Especially since you are completely wrong.
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 12:43:00   #
joe_flippin wrote:
I think it is a frog.


Well, whatever he is, he is adoable. Love his bug eyes :-)
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 01:40:12   #
joe_flippin wrote:
When it rains in our house in Brazil, the frogs come out. This was in our back yard. They get into the house; they are everywhere.


Oh my. What a cutie. What is it, frog or toad?
Go to
Oct 10, 2011 01:17:36   #
fivedawgz wrote:
So the family, all three generations of it, trooped off to my grandson Michael's place ... and I took some pictures. of Michael and Kaitlin together and then the whole family ... a very rare moment! It went well. Aside from some burned out highlight from the very bright sun, these are the kind of family pictures we love because they tell a story.

Then we went and ate sushi (yum!) ...

With some trepidation I submit my two favorite pictures of the sluice. Kind of neat.


I think that all family photos count as snapshots ... but they can be a lot of fun, too. This one was!
Go to
Oct 9, 2011 23:32:42   #
So the family, all three generations of it, trooped off to my grandson Michael's place ... and I took some pictures. of Michael and Kaitlin together and then the whole family ... a very rare moment! It went well. Aside from some burned out highlight from the very bright sun, these are the kind of family pictures we love because they tell a story.

Then we went and ate sushi (yum!) ...

With some trepidation I submit my two favorite pictures of the sluice. Kind of neat. These are both picture of the sluice.





The younger generations ... my son (the tallest one), daughter-in-law, granddaughter and grandson.

Go to
Oct 9, 2011 20:46:30   #
CmdrDick wrote:
OK, how's this.
40 pound King Salmon, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

CmdrDick


Okay ... I'M impressed.
Go to
Oct 9, 2011 20:45:30   #
Randyb1969 wrote:
George H wrote:


Randy,
I was referring to those who consider themselves pros because they have pro (Sic) quality cameras, 5DmkII or any of the Canon 1Ds models or Nikon D3s. It all still boils down to the individual, I shoot Fashion, am I Dan Leca, no, or Randy, no, but I do get a lot of work and make a good living.
I have seen the work of many of the so called pros, and know many that are not pros who put them to shame. It is the person, not the equipment that makes photography an art, the equipment just makes it easier.
br br Randy, br I was referring to those who... (show quote)


I agree, but that has nothing to do with technology. That's about money. I suppose I should not have used the 5D in my statement. If Ansel Adams were 14 today and someone gave him a kodak P&S digicam, he'd still be Ansel Adams. But if he were born to a poor family and the only way for him to be great was to have a medium format camera and his own darkroom, guess what? He'd be working at Wendys and the world would miss out. That's why technology is good. It's the only thing that even begins to equalize masses with the wealthy.
quote=George H br br Randy, br I was referr... (show quote)


That's a really good point and I never thought of it. But you're right.
Go to
Oct 9, 2011 01:56:34   #
BrandyVSOP wrote:
"It ain't the arrow, it's the Injin - Lee Travino"

A photo friend just posted that comment, under our group where it says, "What kind of camera do you own?"
I like it a lot, and think how eloquently simple it is.

I started out in photography with film cameras just when they were getting "Through The Lens Metering" and bayonet mount lenses. They were not automatic, you had to decide what aperture and shutter speed to use with every shot. The "ASA" now "ISO" was not much of a matter of choice. There was no Auto focus. I'm so thankful I entered photography at that point. It gave me the understanding of those integral relationships.

The more lenses I got, the more decisions there were about which to use. I bought some Medium Format cameras Mamiya M645 & RB-67... ( someone's dream camera... It now sits idle in a case over by the door.)

At some point I quit taking pictures until I got my first Digital camera a Sony Mavica FD-73 in 1999. It used 3 1/2" floppy discs for its "Film". That camera awakened my creativity like never had before. Only one lens, with a 35mm equivalent of 40 to 400mm with a 10x optical zoom lens. I had so much fun with it, and my creativity with it was amazing.

4 years ago. I bought another much more modern digital camera (P&S) with adjustable aperture and shutter speed. It was fun.

Now I have 2, 2007 model Canon 40D's and an ever expanding lens collection.

I take pictures for my enjoyment (like I always have), and keep trying to make myself happier with my images. But from my very first camera, to the one I might have 5 from now, they are the tools I use to capture the images with. The pictures are a product of my creativity, my artistic imagination (or lack there of), and the equipment I use. Some of my new lens, give me images I could only dream about in the past

But in the end...
"It ain't the arrow, it's the Injin - Lee Travino"
"It ain't the arrow, it's the Injin - Lee Tra... (show quote)


Oh wow I had that Mavica too. Two of them, actually. They were totally cool at the time. Loved those floppy disks (remember when floppy disks were really floppy?).

Yes, it has been a journey and I'm glad it's not over. Never had a Mamiya, but I had a Rollei and a Bronica. Actually, I've had so many cameras I really don't remember all of them. I guess I'm not done yet.
Go to
Oct 8, 2011 21:21:10   #
marmesto wrote:
I suppose, if you're young enough, you cannot remember when a roll of film had twenty or thirty-six shots. It forced the photographer to be judicious about the shots taken. In fact, one very important exercise, which taught dicipline, was to take one... and only one... image. It's a great way to become careful and to look for that picture. While backpacking, I couldn't carry a ton of film. Besides, I couldn't afford the processing... and thus, I learned how to develop and process my own images. There were many images that I did not capture. They only exist in my mind. It's a pity that I can't figure out how to get them from my memory to paper.

But I believe that digital photography offers the option to squeeze that shutter button more often. Fewer opportunities are lost. More mistakes can be economically made, and better understanding of how we paint with light is encouraged. If we are lucky, we even have more of our own experiences to share with others. Bravo technology! And to all, I say keep taking photographs. The more the better.
I suppose, if you're young enough, you cannot reme... (show quote)


So, we go in a circle. There were good things about learning on film, primarily that we really LEARNED. And the lessons stuck with us. Because we learned mostly on black and white film, we also spent a lot of time on composition. Because we were young and poor, we tried to make every shot count. We learned how to use a darkroom.

But digital offers the freedom to experiment without worrying about the cost of film, chemicals, and/or processing. We don't need to figure out where we can put the darkroom (the basement lavatory?) ... the ubiquitous computer is a darkroom and much more.

I think learning on film is like learning to drive on a manual transmission: you learn more about what you're doing. But it's easier to use an automatic and in heavy traffic, I appreciate not having to do all that shifting.

Pluses and minuses to both. Over all, I appreciate the freedom from film but I'm glad I learned using it. And that's where we began, was it not?
Go to
Oct 8, 2011 19:11:32   #
bobmielke wrote:
I won't say much as I've learned my lesson on just mentioning the word Re...............an word. I just know I'm fed up with our government and our citizens fighting each other to gain control of "their" agenda.

Gone are the days when one party gave way to a winning opponent and immediately the country get behind their duly elected official. Now the plot to cause our ruling leader to fail starts on his first day in office.

I fear for the role the United States will play in the world if we can't get our act together soon. Every great civilization in history fell because of internal corruption. Is that our fate?
I won't say much as I've learned my lesson on just... (show quote)


And gone are the days when we could agree too disagree. LONG gone are the days when either party will put the greater good of the nation they claim to serve over their party agendas. That is why I don't want to talk about it.

Civility is gone from the national character. Now, we just threaten each other with violence or death. No one is listening, no one wants a dialogue. It's just hate and anger and fear mongering. It's ugly and I want no part of it.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 68 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.