Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nealbralley
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14 next>>
May 3, 2024 20:28:41   #
kcj wrote:
I do not like the mirrorless because I have a lot of Nikon lenses that I can’t use on them Also I believe the 850 is a workhorse and also easier on batteries


The D850 is a great camera. Perhaps the best, or one of the best DSLRs ever made. I use mine all the time. I keep mine for the same reason. I have the good DSLR lenses, and mirrorless products aren’t that much of an improvement, if an improvement at all, in my opinion!
Go to
May 1, 2024 14:18:59   #
[quote=Dan S]I was just wondering which would be better. sd cards

I have had no issues with either type of SD cards.
Go to
May 1, 2024 14:10:59   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The age of the DSLR is over. The time of the MILC has come!


You are a legend in your own mind!
Go to
May 1, 2024 14:08:51   #
Sinewsworn wrote:
Selling some DSLR gear. Took my D500 in hand and snapped a few pics. Great feeling and sound. That mirror moving up and down brings back fond memories.

Anyone else?


DSLRs a superb system of systems with which to photograph images. I know for certain that DSLRs take photographs every bit as good as any mirrorless camera. I don’t give a hoot what others say! If you know what you are doing, the DSLRs will deliver the shots, and they will do so for less! No rolling shutter, better low-light visibility through the viewfinder. While mirrorless cameras may give you ”what you see is what you get,” in the view finder or the LCD, as I said before, if you know what you are doing, mirrorless isn’t any better!

There is such a thing as “good enough!” DSLRs are more than “good enough!” Don’t fall for the hype!
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 13:06:50   #
Mb22346 wrote:
I am looking to buy a camera and I wanted to know three things first of all. What brand would you buy?
Second, what type would you buy i.e. mirror less or DSLR
And finally, would you ever buy a camera that has been refurbished?


There are many great cameras out there. While I have both mirrorless and DSLRs, either will work fine for most shooters. Mirrorless cameras are lighter, and often smaller. DSLRs tend to be more robust, and I believe more rugged, but some folks don't like the weight and size of DSLRs. Others will disagree with me, and I certainly don't give a hoot what they think. I like DSLRs because they have no lag when you turn them on. You may have to wait with some mirrorless cameras because they do their digital/computer slow turn-on sequence. I find it annoying.

Mirrorless cameras provide a nice viewfinder with pretty much a "what you see is what you will get" in your snapped image. DSLRS don't do that when looking through an optical viewfinder. However, optical viewfinders often provide a better image screen within the viewfinder when you shoot in low-light conditions.

Bottomline, either system will work just fine. Many DSLRs are on the market today, and you can get bargains on used gear from the reputable used on-line stores such as KEH. They offer free returns (if you don't like what you get) and a 180-day warranty. I have bought multiple cameras and lenses from KEH, and I always received more than I expected! Sure, DSLRs are no longer being manufactured, but they are widely available, and they work splendidly.

Buy what feels good in your hand and provides you with a good view when you look through the viewfinder or LCD screen on the back of the camera. Remember, lenses are more important than the camera body, so look for a decent camera body, but spend you money on better lenses. Buy into a camera system having a good variety of affordable, good glass. What brand? Frankly, it doesn't matter, all of the major manufacturers make good equipment: Canon, Nikon, Sony, FujiFilm, Olympus/OM-1, Panasonic/Lumix. Do you want full-frame (heavier, larger, more expensive, and generally better resolution), a crop sensor camera which will likely be lighter, and lenses less expensive, Micro Four Thirds (MFT) has a smaller sensor, but they still do a fine job for many users; these are smaller and lighter to carry. There is no right answer, and there is no one-size that fits all users' needs. Shop around, and have fun doing it!
Go to
Apr 17, 2024 14:57:39   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The EFS 18-135 'family' of lenses is exactly the general purpose lens you should be looking at. The "IS USM" version is the third and final release, specifically EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. If a used copy such as an EX-rated version at KEH is beyond your reach, any of the IS-enabled lenses in this 18-135 range will fit your needs.


I echo his comments. I have found KEH to be an excellent source of used equipment. I have always found that what they sell is in better condition than the condition that they say it is in. If you don't like what you receive for your money, you may return it to them, and they warranty their used products for 180 days if I recall correctly.
Go to
Apr 11, 2024 22:50:06   #
Blaster34 wrote:
Everything I read points to turning off stabilization (OS) when using a tripod. However, presuming the electronic shutter works by turning the sensor on and off again and is supposedly silent, ie, without the moving parts of a mechanical shutter, then should it really matter if the camera's OS is turned off or not while on a tripod? Does that technique also apply to lenses with built-in stabilization? Cheers!


I always shoot with stabilization “on” with my various cameras, and I have had zero issues while shooting with a tripod. Perhaps many years ago that may have been a problem, but not with my cameras, and they aren’t particularly “new”!
Go to
Mar 28, 2024 13:44:26   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
For most everyone, pixel resolution at 20MP is more than enough for any editing and / or printing needs. That 20MP to 20MP range is what the 'working professionals' need for a 2-page spread (magazine print), as if anyone was still printing or purchasing physical magazines in 2024. We see this reality in the slow upward migration of the top (flagship) pro DSLR models.

Examples:

Nikon
D3X - 24MP, 2010
D5 - 20MP, 2017
D6 - 21MP, 2020

Canon
1Ds-III - 21MP, 2007
1DX - 18MP, 2011
1DX-III - 20MP, 2016

Meanwhile, at the same time those flagship models were being released, all around the $6000 per body price range, even the entry-level models were reaching a standard 24MP resolution. The 'pro' full-frame models at one level-down from the 'flagship' bodies reached a 30- to 50MP range for the same timeframe, examples like the D810, D850 and 5DIV models, as well as the top full-frame mirrorless bodies typically all coming out around 45MP.

Personally, for my wildlife photography, I can 'see' the difference in cropping into the results in FF cameras with the same focal length lenses, where one body is 22MP and the other 24MP. I have more options with the images (camera) that has more pixels, even just a 2MP difference. I've also seen demonstrations of the massive print sizes and massive fine details of architecture and cityscapes captured at 45MP.

But again, for most everyone not shooting distant wildlife and not printing anything, buying bodies (sensors) beyond 24MP is just wasting money on capabilities you'll never need.
For most everyone, pixel resolution at 20MP is mor... (show quote)



Additionally in the realm of photo journalists who very often use the flagship cameras referenced above, those photographers are generally shooting in JPEG because that is what their editors demand. Megapixels are often a "red herring."
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 18:02:00   #
Nikkor 105, f/2.8 micro is an excellent macro lens; it is a good regular lens as well!
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 11:13:51   #
D500 at 20 megapixels is a superb DX camera. It will perform rings around the other Nikon DX DSLRs! I am not giving up on my D500s, D750, or D850s. They’re paid for, the lenses are paid for, and mirrorless cameras, while perhaps minutely marginally better, aren’t so much better as to make me want to move! Long live the DSLR!
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 11:03:47   #
The Tamron 150-500 for Sony is a great lens. While it isn’t a feather, it isn’t too heavy. Perhaps, instead, you should buy a carbon fiber monopod.

I use my Tamron 150-500 on a Sony a6600, and it takes pictures every bit as good, or better, as what I get with a Nikon D500 or D850 with the Nikkor 500mm PF lens. That Tamron lens is superb. I don’t think a bridge camera will compete! You will likely be giving up both lens quality and sensor size and quality.


Go to
Mar 13, 2024 14:53:53   #
I have an Epson ET-8500, and so far it has been fine. I had an earlier model Epson and a Canon printer, both Eco-type printers, and both eventually had clogged printer heads that wouldn't clean themselves.

The Canon printer did not have an illuminated small monitor, and that was a total pain in the rear for sure. The Epson 8500 is illuminated, and I am much happier with it. I cannot address the 8550, specifically.

I print on various photo papers, and the results seem to be acceptable for my use. I am not in the professional sales category, so they more than meet my needs.
Go to
Mar 3, 2024 13:51:21   #
When it comes to photo journalism JPEG is king. The files are small, and the photographer can transmit them nearly instantly. As others have mentioned, reduces alterations which might reduce the credibility of the publications.

Also, many professional photo journalists use cameras having minimal megapixels. Really blows the high megapixel camera arguments right out of the water!
Go to
Feb 27, 2024 14:49:31   #
I use DxO. I have contacted their support through their chat, and I have gotten the help I needed. I would not say that it was instantaneous, but they did resolve my problem for me. Keep in mind that if your question necessitates going to a software designer or engineer for resolution, those people are located in France.
Go to
Feb 21, 2024 14:27:42   #
Two things you could consider: (1) shoot in RAW + JPEG and save both to your SD, CF Express, or XQD card. (2) Within my DXO post processing program, once I have processed and saved an image, the saved image is a JPEG image. The original image remains RAW. The processed, saved image will be much smaller so you can share it in email. I suspect other post processing programs do the same thing.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.