I ask it again, because it is never answered. Many of the pro-gun crowd claim, that widespread guns has nothing to do with high rate of murders, as the guns are only tools and if wanna-be-killers did not have access to them, they would just murder with another tool. This is probably true, but it also ignores the fact, that more efficient tools get more work (in this case bloody work) done. I am just taking that argument to the extreme, to show how silly it is. Better tools (weapons) equals more work getting done i.e. more deaths.
It gets even more silly, when pro-gunners try to make a point (this has been done several times in various threads here) by mentioning the case from China with a nut case attacking school children with a knife and claiming that knifes (or clubs) kill as well as guns. This despite the facts of the story, that clearly shows, that knifes are so much less efficient. The guy managed to stab many children, a few of them very seriously, but not a single one died.

Hey Doc ..... ya left out grenades, the Britts in the UK have grenades .....

.....ya know the way a bull sees red and gets mad, well in the UK the Britts see a parking meter, the Queen gets the coin and the Britts are pissed, so they blow up parking meters with em doc .....

..... you should see what they do with baseball bats doc .....