Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jcboy3
Page: <<prev 1 ... 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 ... 936 next>>
Oct 21, 2014 13:30:40   #
TracyT4i wrote:
100mm f2.8L


You don't mention whether you have a full frame or crop camera, and that's pretty important.

For example, I'll assume you have a crop camera (e.g. Nikon D7100).

Three people sitting in leaves will need at least 6' x 4' of space. You don't want them all lined up, but staggered some. Let's give them each 10 inches, so you need 30 inches (2.5 feet) front to back. Now you can focus on the middle person, so you need 20 inches to the back and 10 inches in front. DOF usually gives more to the back than front. So the key number is 20 inches (1.65 feet). You'll get the front person more in focus that way, as well.

With a 100mm lens, you need to be at a distance of 27 feet to get a 6' x 4' field of view (FOV). At 27 feet, the DOF is 1.3 feet behind the subject at f/2.8. You can move back to about 30 feet to get the desired DOF (increasing the FOV to 6'9" wide), or you can decrease aperture to f/3.6.

For me, if I was interested in narrow DOF, I would shoot at 27 feet with an aperture bracket of +/-2/3EV (in other words, shoot at f/2.8, f/3.6, f/4.5) and then pick the shot I liked.

If your camera will automatically shoot an aperture bracket, then set the bracket to 3 frames/0.7EV, set camera mode to shutter priority, burst mode, exposure compensation to -2/3EV (to avoid overexposure), and adjust shutter speed and ISO to get an aperture of f/3.6 (with shutter speed at least 1/160). And shoot RAW, because the shots will vary by 4/3 EV. Then fire away.

Otherwise, you can set to aperture mode and adjust aperture as you shoot. In that case, lock the camera on a tripod so the framing stays the same as you rotate aperture and press shutter (hard to keep the camera pointed consistently when doing this).
Go to
Oct 21, 2014 10:12:32   #
Nightski wrote:
Someone just recommended this method of cleaning my sensor to me. I watched the tutorial, and it looks like an awesome way to clean your sensor. Has anyone else ever used this product? Did you like it? Are there any problems I should watch out for when using it?


I cannot imagine a more risky thing to do with a camera (okay, changing lenses in a sandstorm or on a boat). If a rocket blower won't clean the sensor, send it in for cleaning. If you damage the sensor, you will have a mighty big repair bill.
Go to
Oct 21, 2014 10:06:07   #
RiverNan wrote:
and if so...how do you price that.

I have been asked by the manager of the gift shop of a local historic site to sell my images in digital format so they can be printed as postcards by them and sold in the shop.

I WOULD like to establish a professional relationship with this venue (it is so close to my home) but not sure how to work it out.

The manager was interested in some of my images which she would buy to sell in the shop once I print them on 8x10canvas (on order now).

A relationship would allow me access to all historic events..giving me plenty of opportunities to get desirable images.

Just not sure I want to sell for their unlimited use? and have no idea how to price it if I do.

open for suggestions so please make some.
and if so...how do you price that. br br I have b... (show quote)


I've sold for real estate; got $5-$10 for each shot. I start with the high amount for the first 5-10 shots, then lower for additional. Depends on the client.

I haven't sold any postcards (yet) but I would ask for $50-$100 for each shot. I would go for the lower amount for images you've already shot, higher for spec shots.

If I print, I clear about 2-3 times cost after the store sells the print (that includes the cost for print, mount and store fee). If the store is buying for sale, then I would charge twice the cost to print and mount.

If there are any identifiable people in your shots, you need to have a signed model release. If you are selling prints to the store, you should use a contract for the sale of fine art photography. If you are letting the store sell your prints, use a gallery contract for sale of photography. For the post cards, you should use a licensing contract to merchandise images.

For the prints, sign and date the image on the back. Discuss with the store whether they want the front signed. Provide a business card along with the print (if you don't have one, get one). I like to attach one to the back as well. Also, make a little card with a bio on it. Nothing fancy, but aimed at personalizing you as a photographer.

For the postcards, see if you can get an attribution on the descriptions (e.g. "The local covered bridge", photograph by me). Put that into the license agreement. Always get a few copies of whatever they print; and put that in the license agreement as well.

You can limit the number of cards printed, or get an additional fee for additional cards printed. I would not press this to start, but if they come back for more then you can negotiate better terms.

Templates for all of these forms can be readily found on the web. Good luck.
Go to
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 19, 2014 10:49:09   #
dragon64 wrote:
Most concert promoters won't allow flash pictures because they want you to buy photos from them. But a lot of people still take pictures. The lighting in an arena is your worst enemy. When I used to shoot pics at concerts I had a fair amount of success because in most cases people where allowed to briefly get up close to take a few pictures of the performance. I used either a Canon F1 or A1 with either a FD F1.4 or a FD F1.2 lens and 400 speed color film. All was done with out a tripod or monopod. But then I was younger then and had a steadier hand.
Most concert promoters won't allow flash pictures ... (show quote)


Flash rules have little to do with concert promoter greed. Flash is distracting to the artists and the audience. Unless you want to be considered a paparazzi, you should always get permission before using flash.
Go to
Oct 18, 2014 10:20:27   #
Spacetime wrote:
Thanks, I was afraid of that. Hopefully they will allow for flash at the next concert. It's that or get a better camera.


I can't recall ever being at a commercial concert that allowed flash photography. Most venues have one of three policies: (1) no photography, (2) no flash photography, (3) no professional photography. Usually, what they mean by "no professional photography" is that the camera does not have an interchangeable lens. Sometimes, it can't have a viewfinder.

As an aside, the latter policy means everyone will be holding up their phone camera and the audience is exposed to a sea of LCD screens.

I check before going, and if the policy is "no professional", then I bring my Panasonic FZ200 bridge camera. It works well if I'm close, not so good at a distance. Otherwise, I bring a mirrorless camera (Panasonic GH3, Olympus E-M5 or E-M1).

I shoot in manual exposure mode with exposure preview (and on the Olympus with highlight/shadow on to see blown highlights). Need to keep the shutter speed relatively high (1/100 sec), usually wide open and adjust exposure with ISO setting. Image stabilization is on.
Go to
Oct 16, 2014 10:54:02   #
bettis1 wrote:
I've been using the AF/AE lock on my D7100 for back button focusing for a couple of weeks now. So far I am very pleased. The only problem is that when I first pick up the camera to shoot I still attempt to focus with the top button but once my brain kicks into gear and I overcome that old habit I don't have any problems with the AF button on subsequent shots.

I wonder just how common using BBF is with photographers, both pros and serious hobbyists, and if any of you have used it and stopped for some reason or other. I'll be interested in your comments.

Bob
I've been using the AF/AE lock on my D7100 for bac... (show quote)


I don't use BBF per se because it gets in the way of shooting fast, and it gets too confusing when switching cameras. I shoot Olympus and Panasonic micro Four Thirds (and Panasonic FZ200 bridge). Each has a method for separating focus from exposure/shutter release which I use instead of allocating focus to another button.

With Olympus, I assign the auto/manual focus toggle to the video record button. Use the shutter half press to focus, then toggle to manual, then compose and shoot. Toggle back to auto focus when I need to refocus. The viewfinder displays the focus mode (MF, S-AF) for confirmation.

With Panasonic, I assign AF to the AF/AE Lock button. Pressing the AF/AE Lock button will focus and lock focus. Pressing it again will unlock focus. When focus is unlocked, the shutter half-press will set focus.

Both of these approaches allow focus to be locked, but leaves the shutter half-press to set focus when focus is not locked.

If I am changing zoom but keeping the subject in a similar position in the frame, then I move the focus point so I don't have to reposition the camera much (or at all) when setting focus.

Finally, both Olympus and Panasonic micro four thirds have touch screen capability where you can frame the subject and then touch the screen where you want focus set. Olympus can be set to just set focus (which can then be locked by changing to MF). Or with both, the camera will focus and release the shutter.
Go to
Oct 15, 2014 13:15:03   #
redhogbill wrote:
I had a hole in my focal lengths! so I have been looking at 70-200mm lenses,
you know how it starts
1st, you get an idea!
2nd you go online and start looking at lenses {knowing you have the money rat holed for just an episode! but telling your self you can't afford it!!}
day 3 and 3rd on the list you go to Nikon {or canon depending on what you use} and look at "ALL the lenses wishing you could have at least half of them, but then I digress, and start looking in the focal lengths your interested in, knowing full well they are expensive!!
day 4 and 4th on the list you decide to go to sigma and tamron and look at the lenses and compare!
day 5 and 5th on the list go to e-bay {knowing full well a used one is as much as a new one, but you look anyways!!!
day 6 and 6th on the list, now your chompping at the bit, you have to have it at any cost, hands are clammy, got the cold sweats, mouth is dry, you just can not drink enough coffee!!! you have buzzing in your ears and can't sleep!!!!
day 7 and 7th on the list. "you pull the trigger", your chest gets tight {hoping it is not a heart attack!!} mouth is really dry, the ringing in your ears is so load you are sure your wife can hear it!!!!!!
then in an instant it is all over, you write down the confirmation number, run to the front door and sleep on the couch next couple days waiting for a brown truck!!!
wwwhhheeeeeuuuuu!
thanks for listening! gas attack almost over!!

http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-70-200mm-2-8-Telephoto-Nikon/dp/B003HC8VA4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1413333615&sr=8-1&keywords=70-200mm+sigma+for+nikon
I had a hole in my focal lengths! so I have been l... (show quote)


I always have a good laugh at these "GAS" postings on UHH. Usually for just a lens. One lens. Hah!

Hard to say it's "GAS" when filling a hole, and 70-200 is a pretty big hole. Wonder what you have beyond that.

Well, you can get the 70-200 on eBay for $900, which is a good savings over Amazon.

You want to get some real "GAS", go get a 4-light setup for shooting portraits or real-estate (flashes, light stands, triggers, umbrellas, soft boxes, reflectors, batteries, mounts, bases, clamps, cables, cases, filters, diffusers, snoots, grids, barn doors, etc.) When UPS and USPS are showing up at your door every day, then you've got "GAS".
Go to
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Oct 10, 2014 15:01:29   #
Rongnongno wrote:
How many use those?


Just used one to block reflections when shooting through a window.
Go to
Sep 29, 2014 19:25:32   #
will47 wrote:
I got this book from the library and have been reading it. He mentions in this book that he sets is white balance to cloudy and rarely changes it. I am going to try this very soon but I was wondering if anyone here has done this and how did it work out for you? Would this also apply when using fill flash? Thanks.


Well, that will work if you shoot RAW or only go out on cloudy days, but that is definitely not a step I would recommend if you are trying to understand exposure.

Might as well just shoot a sunny 16 rule and throw out anything that doesn't look good (at least you are not likely to overexpose). BTW, that's f/16 and shutter speed of 1/ISO.
Oh, and if it's really cloudy, use f/8.

I did shoot a limestone canyon in Alberta with a 35mm film camera with dead batteries shooting Ektachrome with f/8 and 1/125; one of my favorite pictures.
Go to
Sep 27, 2014 22:19:54   #
If the subject is not moving, then bracket your shots. If the subject is moving then use a continuous shooting mode. You will kick that shutter count in the behind and have a new camera in no time.
Go to
Sep 25, 2014 17:55:03   #
Hibler wrote:
Can someone tell me how the Mirrorless 4/3 camera works on volleyball


Read this article:

http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2012/11/07/how-to-tweak-your-olympus-om-d-e-m5-to-shoot-sports-by-jim-huffman/
Go to
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 23, 2014 12:43:54   #
Hunter Lou 1947 wrote:
JCboy3 ; Would a 7DMarkII and a Sigma 150-600 with a good ball head be a good fit? What ball head would you recommend. Want to be able to shoot birds in flight? I know the 150-600 weighs about 6lbs.


You can find pictures of this on the web. It will work, but its big and heavy and unless you are really tall I would recommend something else. I don't have one, but I'm only 5'9".

It will definitely work with that camera/lens combination. You'll want a large ball head, and you might look into a gimbal head. I have a Sigma 50-500 (4 lbs) and Nikon 400mm f3.5 (6 lbs). I use a Vanguard SBH-250 ball head converted to Arca, and a ProMaster gimbal head (also Arca) for these lenses. I like Arca because I can put a long plate on the tripod mount of the lens and then have a lot of latitude to shift weight around for proper balance.
Go to
Sep 23, 2014 09:30:22   #
psimison wrote:
I have a Gitzo 410 (aluminum) that meets the criteria. It is used (some paint issues 'minor"). Probably the best tripod I have ever used. For sale cheap - $100 plus ship from Florida. It's not light, but it is tall and strong. ;)


From what I can tell, the height is 64", which is not tall enough.
Go to
Sep 23, 2014 07:42:01   #
MarkintheHV wrote:
First, I did use the whole search thing, and still never quite found what I was looking for. I am looking for a tripod that is about 6 ft tall (unextended) with 3 section legs. I need this to support my Sigma 50-500 and Canon 7d.

Any ideas?


Manfrotto 058B has 3 section legs, is 75" tall without center column, supports 26 pounds.
Go to
Sep 19, 2014 23:32:29   #
lighthouse wrote:
Who makes you? The cranes? LOL
I am a little more backwoods than that. I don't photograph anywhere where anyone makes you do anything.
This thread has started me looking at chair blinds. Any ideas?


At the wildlife refuge, the guides make you. The birds spook pretty easily.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 ... 936 next>>
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.