That Mirror website was a nightmare of pop-ups, ads, & junk news. At least that was my experience. Maybe I clicked the wrong link???
I love to shop at EBAY. I've been doing so for years. In all that time, I only ever had just 1 problem where the seller was unresponsive. Finally asked EBAY to step in. They did. Instant money back.
Excellent explanation. Very clear -- even I could understand it.
How does Tamron designate their lenses that have ultrasonic motors?
Thanks. By the way, I do not understand why it wouldn't make more sense, economically speaking, to put the motor in my camera (1-time event) instead of putting motors in each of the lenses (multiple events) that I buy for it.
My Nikon D3500 lacks an internal auto-focusing motor. Ergo, for auto-focus to work, it needs AF-S lenses. AF-S lenses have an internal focusing motor.
A Sigma lens that interests me (because it is much less expensive than its Nikkor counterpart) has Hyper Sonic Motor (abbreviated HSM). HSM is Sigma's designation for its photo lens focusing technology using ultrasonic motor.
Does anyone have experience with a Sigma "HSM" lens on a Nikon DSLR that lacks an internal focusing motor? If so, did the Sigma do a good job auto-focusing your Nikon?
I have learned a LOT from this thread. I am a hog lover... suuu-eeeeeeeeeee! Pig! Pig! Pig!
Based on many of your comments, I have decided (a) to go Nikkor, & (b) back-away a bit from 10X zooms. Nikon makes both 18-135mm & 18-140mm -- I figure going for 1 of those 2.
Please let me have your comments.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P.S. I wonder why Nikon offers 2 different lenses with such near-identical ranges?
Sorry I have no critique. I like them all except the rocks. It's a good shot but.... rocks? My favorite by far is #4 -- it's alive and tack-sharp.
If the snake gets hungry, I will volunteer my neighbor's yippy little Chihuahua.
Good grief, this Arsenal inventor is trying to use AI to take some of the fun out of photography. Oh well, I've heard they have actual sex robots in the UK, so.... what next?
Excellent shots under difficult conditions. It's not easy to get unobstructed shots at Luaus. If you're still in Hawaii, I suggest you head to the Polynesian Cultural Center on Oahu -- great photo opportunities there,
larry48911 wrote:
death is for ever and for some HELL!!
"Hell" is not in the original languages of the Bible. In the NT, "hell" uses a pagan concept to translate a Greek word that transliterates to Strong's G1067 [geena] and inferentially refers to Ge-Hinnom (the valley of Tophet -- Jer 7.32, 19.6 et alia). Ge-hinnom was a literal place in Israel where they, at one time, practiced idolatrous human sacrifice. That site later became Jerusalem's city dump where they burned sewage, garbage, offal, and other waste.
Great photos! Smart to show the vintage license plate. Notice that the trunk really was a trunk -- I suppose the name stuck & that's what we still call it. Same with the glove compartment -- it used to be stylish to wear driving gloves, & compartments on early cars were there so the hoi-polloi would have a place to put their driving gloves when not driving.
In UK the trunk is the boot and the hood is the bonnet. When will those people ever learn to speak proper English? (^_^)
Well, I barely lost the bidding for a used Nikkor lens. The most interesting alternative as of now is the *pre-owned* Tamron A14 AF 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD IF Macro Lens Nikon #910. It's on sale at EBAY by Roberts Camera for $135 (or best offer), free shipping. Roberts rates the condition as "EXCELLENT This item is rated in Excellent condition. That means that this item is between 90-96% of original condition. This item shows little to no cosmetic blemishes and is tested as fully operational."
What do you think? Should I go for the Tamron right now, or save up several months to buy a new Nikkor?
Thanks Bob. I understand.
Follow-up question: Will the Tamron or Sigma lenses work as well with my Nikon D3500 as would the Nikkor?