jim in TC wrote:
I am happy to have just found this forum!
As a long-time enthusiastic amateur, and missing the experience of my old SLR days I am ready to upgrade from a little Canon point/shoot that has actually served me well and a Fuji X20 that is just not quite nice enough. I shoot landscape, mostly, but like to tinker with very close up stuff. Fast action and focal lengths needed for wildlife are not particularly an issue. Favorite shots might get printed, never larger than (and almost always smaller than) 16x20 or so.
Other things equal, I will work with my local camera shop, unless selection becomes an issue. The further I can stay under $1,000 the better, though I would stretch a bit to lens up later if necessary.
I am looking at Nikon D3300/3400 at a good price with a lens kit (18-55mm and 55-300 mm) or D5500 but without some of the promo pricing. They carry Canon but do not seem too thrilled with Canon's lower end DSLRs compared to Nikon. Thoughts on that? I do like the relatively small size of the D3300/3400. One of the changes with the new 3400 is the elimination of a sensor cleaner in the camera. Do those things work very well, or is a (carefully done) manual cleaning the best way to maintain anyway? Both are currently available, but D3300 will be gone for good when sold out.
Intriguing, and also with some holiday promotions, are a couple offerings in the Olympus OM-D mirroless series, with smaller size and interesting features. They have a Fuji model I haven't yet looked at.
For macro work it seems that the options are a standalone lens, which the camera shop people strongly recommend or an inexpensive screw-on closeup ring. Nikon and Olympus both offer a closeup ring - any specific experiences with them?
Are there thoughts or experiences on sensor quality between Nikon low end DSLR and Olympus OM-D (and Canon, for that matter)?
Of some small concern is battery life in the mirrorless, which I am told is substantially less than DSLR. What are your experiences there? I don't need to cover an all-day wedding shoot or like that, and am willing to carry a spare if necessary.
General thoughts on the mirrorless experience will be appreciated. The OM-D series has a viewfinder built in, which is, for me, an essential feature.
I am happy to have just found this forum! br br A... (
show quote)
I too am pretty new to the UHH, and have a D7100, and an OMD EM1 that I bought for traveling. It's easier for me to get good results with the Oly. Olympus also has a great selection of lenses to choose from. If you're into flash photography, Olympus may not be the best choice.