pendennis wrote:
Right now, there are subsidies for "green energy" Windmills are subsidized all the back to the cost of steel for the blades, towers, etc. At some point those subsidies will vanish, and the true cost of wind power will be passed on to the consumer. The steel makers now, don't even earn back the cost of coke for their production. Steel production is also dependent on fossil fuels plus nuclear, because "green energy" can't produce enough electricity to power the arc furnaces.
Right now, California is demanding the traditional gas stations start to convert a certain percentage to electrical charging stations (on their own dime) at a current cost of some $30K per unit, and that's a conservative estimate.
The state legislatures could probably gain revenue by taxing charging stations, both home and commercial, based on the amount of kilowattage used for recharging. The solution is not to allow for any electrical subsidies. What you use is what you pay.
And, in a marketplace where folks can use a gasoline powered car getting up to 500 miles before refilling; 275 miles plus the time lost in charging, just doesn't make economic sense.
The greatest travesty is the amount of wildlife, especially birds, which are killed by the windmill vanes. Seems the greenies aren't too worried about a few more dead bald eagles.
Right now, there are subsidies for "green ene... (
show quote)
The subsidies are what bother me the most. Why should you pay more in taxes so I can use a technology that only makes economic sense if I get a big fat deduction. If alternative energy sources pass the financial smell test call me up, if not then use my share of that tax subsidy for something important like the national debt.